ANOTHER KAMEL AND KNAT SATIRE NEWS STORY

WARNING! Rated G-PS for POLITICAL SATIRE

The Kamel and Knat

Majority of Congressional Republicans Say, "the Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend" Philosophy is Only Acceptable When It Benefits Them

Click Below for Important Details, Commentary, and a Video Link:

https://open.substack.com/pub/kamelandknat/p/majority-of-congressional-republicans?r=2u8e73&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

Target Blog News Media Publications

(Episode 5) The Gatekeeper: The Rise, Resilience, and Reinvention of Gilbert Ramez Chagoury

(Compiled By) Televangelist HB Morgan Digital Library Publications

The year is 2004. On a dusty airstrip in Nigeria's remote northeast, officers from the country's anti‑corruption agency lie in wait. Their target: Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese‑Nigerian tycoon whose private jet is just touching down. Nuhu Ribadu, the fearless young prosecutor who leads the operation, believes he is moments away from nailing the "kingpin" of the corruption that defined the late dictator Sani Abacha's regime. But before the agents can move, the jet is airborne again—Chagoury has been tipped off, and Ribadu's prize slips away into the humid Nigerian sky. "His great escape," the press will later call it.

That moment encapsulates a larger truth about Gilbert Chagoury. For five decades, across seven Nigerian heads of state, three republics and two military dictatorships, this "man with no title and no office" has been present wherever power and money converge in Africa's largest nation. He has been convicted of money laundering and celebrated with national honours; he has been chased through the courts on three continents and embraced in the corridors of Washington; he has left in his wake both architectural marvels and communities literally reduced to ashes. His story, as this article will show, is not ultimately about the man himself—it is a mirror reflecting how Nigeria's political economy has functioned for nearly half a century, where access to power, rather than competitive merit, determines who builds the nation.

I. Sons of the Diaspora: The Making of a Nigerian‑Lebanese Dynasty

Gilbert Ramez Chagoury was born on 8 January 1946 in Lagos, Nigeria, to Lebanese‑immigrant parents. His father had arrived decades earlier as part of the great Levantine commercial diaspora that settled along West Africa's trade routes, establishing trading posts, importing textiles and exporting agricultural commodities. By the mid‑20th century, Lagos was home to a vibrant Lebanese community—shopkeepers, traders, middlemen—who occupied that liminal space between the British colonial elite and the indigenous population, developing a mercantile culture built on family networks and informal financing.

Young Gilbert was sent to Lebanon for his education at the prestigious Collège des Frères Chrétiens, a Maronite Christian institution that imbued him with the French language and a cosmopolitan outlook. Yet the pull of Nigeria—where the real commercial opportunities lay—was irresistible. By 1971, he was back in Lagos, and together with his younger brother Ronald (born 1949) he co‑founded the Chagoury Group. What began as a modest construction‑and‑property firm eventually evolved into a sprawling conglomerate spanning flour milling, water bottling, glass manufacturing, insurance, hotels, furniture manufacturing, telecommunications, transportation, IT, catering, and international financing.

The brothers' early breakthrough arose from a simple reality: post‑civil‑war Nigeria needed to rebuild. The Chagourys' C & C Construction—the forerunner of what would become Hitech and ITB—secured government contracts to build roads, barracks, and public buildings. By the late 1970s, the group had already expanded into flour milling with the Grands Moulins du Bénin, capitalising on Nigeria's growing demand for bread and baked goods. It was the model they would follow for decades: identify where the state was spending, position themselves as indispensable, and deliver—often with exceptional quality, insiders would later note, but always through direct relationships rather than open tenders.

Yet what truly propelled the Chagoury brothers from successful businessmen to central players in Nigeria's political economy was their ability to forge deep personal ties with those who wielded raw power. And no one wielded more raw power—or would define the darker, more notorious chapter of Gilbert Chagoury's career—than General Sani Abacha.

II. The Abacha Years: Gatekeeper, Bagman, Confidant

Nigeria's military dictatorships of the 1990s, and Abacha's rule from 1993 to 1998 in particular, represented a peculiar form of governance: absolute power concentrated in the hands of a single soldier, exercised through a tight circle of family members, security officials, and trusted civilian intermediaries. Gilbert Chagoury positioned himself as the most trusted intermediary of all.

Philippe Vasset, longtime editor of the influential Africa Energy Intelligence newsletter, described Chagoury's role with precision: "He was the gatekeeper to Abacha's presidency". In Nigeria, Vasset explained, a Western entrepreneur might hand over money to a fixer or middleman, who would then pass it on to a political leader in exchange for support for a business venture. Chagoury was exactly such a figure in the mid‑1990s, when Abacha ruled the country and held the key to much of its oil wealth.

The gatekeeper's services were in constant demand. In August 1996, U.S. Congressman Bill Richardson (later U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations) met with Abacha in Abuja—and then repaired to Chagoury's private home for further discussions over pizza. The Christian Science Monitor reported that Chagoury and Abacha had together "reputedly generated billions of dollars for themselves in profits and hidden commissions". When a foreign oil company needed a concession, or a Western government needed to send a message to the dictator, the path often led through the Lebanese businessman's living room.

Nuhu Ribadu, who would later become famous as the fearless head of Nigeria's Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), was unequivocal: "You couldn't investigate corruption without looking at Chagoury". Ribadu alleged that Chagoury made it possible for Abacha to steal billions of dollars and lined his own pockets in the process.

When Abacha died suddenly in June 1998—of a heart attack, reportedly in the company of Indian sex workers—the full scale of the looting began to emerge. Nigeria's government estimated that Abacha had stolen at least $5 billion. Investigators traced complex networks of shell companies and bank accounts stretching from London to Geneva to the Caribbean. At the centre of many of these transactions, they found Chagoury.

According to court records and investigative reports, Chagoury served as a reference for Abacha's sons at Credit Suisse, helping open accounts through which the stolen funds flowed. He allegedly facilitated the transfer of over $120 million in looted funds to Swiss accounts. When British authorities investigated, Chagoury confessed in a London court in 2001 to assisting the Abacha family in transferring approximately $300 million into foreign bank accounts. Separately, reports indicate that after Abacha's death, Chagoury returned an estimated $300 million to the Nigerian government—a payment that secured his indemnity from possible criminal charges.

The 1998–2000 period was perhaps the most perilous of Chagoury's life. With Abacha gone and a democratic government under Olusegun Obasanjo determined to investigate the looted billions, Chagoury faced a stark choice: negotiate his way out, or face prosecution. He chose the former—and proved remarkably adept at it.

III. The Art of the Escape: Swiss Courts, Settlement Deals, and an Aborted Arrest

The legal reckoning came first in Europe. In 2000, a Geneva court convicted Chagoury of money laundering in connection with the Abacha loot. The conviction could have marked the end of his career—or his liberty. Instead, Chagoury's lawyers negotiated a settlement that has since become a template for how the ultra‑wealthy navigate legal jeopardy: he agreed to pay a fine of approximately one million Swiss francs (about $600,000 at the time) and returned $66 million to the Nigerian government. Critically, under the terms of the deal, his criminal record was expunged after two years. In effect, Chagoury bought his way out of a criminal conviction.

But the most dramatic escape occurred on Nigerian soil. In July 2004, Nuhu Ribadu—by then head of the EFCC—believed he had finally outmanoeuvred Chagoury. Ribadu indicted Chagoury for relatively minor violations related to his businesses, hoping to use these as a gateway to bring more serious charges relating to the Abacha era. He set a trap: lure Chagoury to a remote airstrip in Nigeria's far northeast on the pretext of a routine matter, then arrest him on arrival.

The plan nearly worked. Police lay in wait as Chagoury's private jet touched down. But "no sooner had Chagoury's plane hit the ground, than it took off again". Ribadu later concluded that an airport official had tipped Chagoury off via radio. The tycoon's jet disappeared into the sky, and Ribadu's big catch slipped away—literally into thin air.

The failed arrest became legend. It demonstrated, in the most visceral way, that Chagoury possessed something that transcended money: access. Someone, somewhere in the machinery of state, had been willing to risk detection to warn him. That someone—or more likely, the entire network of relationships Chagoury had cultivated—would prove far more durable than any individual administration.

For the next several years, Chagoury kept a lower profile in Nigeria: the Obasanjo administration was hostile, and he and his brother Ronald "were pursued out of Nigeria" during this period. But rather than simply retreat, Chagoury began constructing what would become the most important weapon in his arsenal: legitimacy, purchased through philanthropy and carefully cultivated in the corridors of Western power.

IV. The Rehabilitation Project: Clinton, Washington, and Strategic Philanthropy

"In recent years," PBS Frontline noted in 2010, Chagoury has "used his money to establish respectability". The observation was precise: respectability was not something Chagoury naturally possessed after the Abacha revelations; it was something he strategically acquired, at considerable expense.

The primary vehicle was the Clinton Foundation. Chagoury appeared near the top of the Foundation's donor list in 2008 and again in 2009, listed as a contributor in the $1 million to $5 million range. His total donations to Clinton‑linked causes were far larger: he also contributed $460,000 to a Democratic voter‑registration group, and in 2009 he pledged an astonishing $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) for his Eko Atlantic project. The pledge—whether or not it was ever fully realised—served its purpose: it transformed Chagoury from a convicted money‑launderer into a "philanthropist" and "partner" in global development.

The quid pro quo, or at least the access that followed, was substantial. Emails released by Judicial Watch in 2016 revealed that longtime Bill Clinton aide Doug Band emailed top Hillary Clinton aides at the State Department—Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills—asking them to arrange a meeting for Chagoury with "a substance person on Lebanon". Band stressed that the request was "very important" and instructed Abedin to reach out to the donor immediately. Chagoury was treated as a priority contact by Hillary Clinton's inner circle at the State Department, even while she was Secretary of State.

The Wall Street Journal catalogued the pattern in detail, and the New York Post declared that Hillary had "played favorites with huge number of Clinton Foundation donors," with Chagoury prominently featured. In leaked emails, Band assured Chagoury's representatives that their requests were being handled at the highest levels.

Yet Chagoury's efforts to purchase influence in Washington were not limited to Democrats. In a striking display of bipartisan strategic positioning, he also navigated Republican circles—and eventually ran afoul of campaign‑finance laws in the process. In 2021, Chagoury signed a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice and paid $1.8 million to resolve allegations that he had conspired to violate federal election laws through a "straw donor" scheme. As a foreign national, Chagoury was prohibited from contributing to U.S. political campaigns. To circumvent this, he routed approximately $180,000 to the campaign committees of four U.S. candidates through American intermediaries—"straw donors"—who passed the money off as their own.

The recipients were all Republicans: the 2012 presidential campaign of Mitt Romney, and the congressional campaigns of Representatives Darrell Issa, Jeff Fortenberry, and Lee Terry. That Chagoury—a major Clinton Foundation donor—was also illegally funding Republican candidates underscores the fundamentally transactional nature of his political engagement: he was not backing ideology; he was buying access, regardless of party.

The Justice Department's announcement of the deferred prosecution agreement cited, among other factors, Chagoury's "unique assistance to the U.S. government"—a phrase whose meaning was never publicly clarified, but which generated intense speculation about what information a Lebanese‑Nigerian billionaire with decades of experience navigating the intersection of African politics and global finance might have been able to provide.

Through it all, Chagoury burnished his reputation as a philanthropist and diplomat. He served as Ambassador to the Vatican for the tiny Caribbean nation of St. Lucia, as economic adviser to President Mathieu Kérékou of Benin, and as ambassador to UNESCO. His donation to the Louvre in Paris was large enough for the museum to name a gallery after him and his wife. He funded medical and nursing schools in Lebanon that bear the Chagoury name. He contributed to the Beverly Hills 9/11 Memorial Garden. "He has built a reputation as a giant of global philanthropy," the Los Angeles Times observed in 2016, noting his "high‑level network of friends from Washington to Lebanon to the Vatican".

But the most audacious—and most tangible—symbol of Chagoury's power was being built not in Paris, Washington, or Rome, but on land reclaimed from the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Lagos.

V. Eko Atlantic: A City Rises, a Community Falls

In 2008, residents of Bar Beach—a sprawling, chaotic, and deeply historic neighbourhood on Lagos's Victoria Island—were given one day's notice. Police arrived in force. What followed was an eviction conducted "with tear gas and fire," according to residents who spoke to the BBC. An estimated 80,000 people were displaced, their plank houses on the water reduced to ashes. Bar Beach, for decades the most popular public beach in Nigeria, a place of Sunday picnics, variety television shows, Pentecostal worship services, and even—in an earlier era—public executions by firing squad, was cleared .

The land was being prepared for Eko Atlantic City, a private metropolis being built on 10 square kilometres of sand reclaimed from the ocean. The project's master developer: South Energyx Nigeria Limited, a subsidiary of the Chagoury Group. Eko Atlantic was—and remains—an engineering marvel, designed to house 250,000 residents and accommodate 150,000 daily commuters. It features its own power grid, water supply, and sewage system, and is protected by an 8.5‑kilometre‑long "Great Wall of Lagos," designed to shield Victoria Island from the coastal erosion that had already swallowed much of Bar Beach.

But the gleaming towers rose on contested ground—and, critics argue, on contested legality. The statutory right of occupancy for the land on which Eko Atlantic sits was signed in 2006 by the then‑Governor of Lagos State: Bola Ahmed Tinubu. It was an act of executive discretion that would have profound consequences, cementing a business‑political alliance that would reshape Nigeria decades later.

VI. The Lagos Don and the Tycoon: The Tinubu Alliance

The relationship between Gilbert Chagoury and Bola Ahmed Tinubu is arguably the most significant business‑political partnership in contemporary Nigerian history. Its roots stretch back to the late 1990s, when Tinubu was preparing to run for Governor of Lagos State. According to multiple reports, Chagoury was one of the largest financial backers of Tinubu's successful 1999 gubernatorial campaign.

What followed was a classic Nigerian political‑business symbiosis. As Governor of Lagos (1999–2007), Tinubu oversaw the allocation of land rights, development approvals, and infrastructure contracts. The Chagoury Group, in turn, became the state's most important developer. The signature projects of Tinubu's governorship—Banana Island, the artificial island in Lagos Lagoon built by the Chagoury Group in partnership with the Federal Ministry of Works, and the land grant for Eko Atlantic City—all bear Chagoury's fingerprints.

But the relationship went beyond contracts. It became familial. Reports have since emerged that Tinubu's son, Seyi Tinubu, sits on the board of one of Chagoury's companies. Leaked corporate documents further revealed that Seyi Tinubu was a majority shareholder in an offshore company registered in the British Virgin Islands alongside Ronald Chagoury Jr., Gilbert's son. The intertwining of the two families was not merely commercial; it was dynastic.

When Tinubu ascended to the presidency in 2023, the alliance entered a new phase. Whereas previous administrations had kept Chagoury at arm's length—Obasanjo pursued him, Jonathan brought the brothers back, Buhari pursued them again—the Tinubu presidency embraced him openly.

VII. Confidant of the President: The Zenith of Power

The most extraordinary symbol of Chagoury's status under Tinubu came in December 2023 at the COP28 climate summit in Dubai. In the official Nigerian delegation list published by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Chagoury was listed with a title no other delegate from any of the 198 participating countries possessed: "Confidant of Mr. President". His "organisation" was listed as the Nigerian State House, and the record indicated he was in a "paid relationship/contract with the nominating entity." No other country had a "confidante" of its president in its official delegation.

The designation was as revealing as it was unprecedented, making explicit what had long been implicit: that Chagoury was not merely a government contractor but an intimate of the head of state, functioning somewhere in the blurry space between official adviser, private associate, and favoured beneficiary.

The contracts that followed were staggering in scale and process. In 2024, the Tinubu administration awarded the Lagos‑Calabar Coastal Highway project—a 700‑kilometre road running along Nigeria's coastline—to Hitech Construction Company, the Chagoury Group subsidiary. The project's cost was initially pegged at 15 trillion naira (approximately $11 billion at prevailing rates), though subsequent estimates ranged higher.

The contract provoked immediate controversy, not only for its size—equivalent to the combined annual budgets of all 36 Nigerian states—but for how it was awarded. There was no competitive bidding. Former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, accused the administration of fraud. He noted that Works Minister Dave Umahi had initially claimed the project would be fully funded by Hitech under a Public‑Private Partnership, only to later reveal that the government would provide 15–30% counterpart financing, and that Hitech could raise only 6% of the money for the pilot phase. "This smacks of deceit," Atiku declared.

Atiku further charged that Tinubu had "re‑awarded the 700km Lagos‑Calabar coastal highway contract to his business partner, Gilbert Chagoury". The former Vice President described the project as "scandalous," noting that the total budget of all 36 states combined was around 14 trillion naira—less than the cost of a single road.

The coastal highway was not the only mega‑contract. Africa Intelligence reported in 2025 that the contract for the renovation of Lagos ports had been awarded to ITB Nigeria, another Chagoury company, without public tender. Together, the projects represented a concentration of infrastructure spending without modern Nigerian precedent—routed almost entirely through a single conglomerate whose principal had been convicted of money laundering in Switzerland less than a quarter‑century earlier.

The culmination of this rehabilitation came in January 2026, when President Tinubu conferred on Chagoury the Grand Commander of the Order of the Niger (GCON), Nigeria's second‑highest national honour, to mark his 80th birthday. In the official letter, Tinubu cited Chagoury's "outstanding virtues" and "services to our country".

The award triggered a fierce backlash. Timi Frank, a prominent political commentator, described the day as "among the saddest days of my life as a Nigerian," recalling the Swiss money‑laundering conviction. "A sitting President shouldn't be in business dealings—directly or indirectly—with close associates while holding office," Frank argued. Another activist, Deji Doherty, called on the National Assembly to investigate the honour.

But the controversy did nothing to slow the partnership. If anything, it only illuminated how fully the gatekeeper of the Abacha era had been rebranded as the confidant of the Tinubu era.

VIII. The Man and the System: A Conclusion

Gilbert Chagoury has outlasted seven Nigerian heads of state: Shehu Shagari, Muhammadu Buhari (in his first, military iteration), Ibrahim Babangida, Sani Abacha, Olusegun Obasanjo, Umaru Musa Yar'Adua, Goodluck Jonathan, and Muhammadu Buhari (in his second, democratic iteration). He has survived criminal conviction, international investigation, and at least one attempted arrest. He has been a "gatekeeper" under a dictator and a "confidant" under a democratically elected president. He has given money to both Democratic and Republican causes in the United States, cultivated relationships from the Vatican to UNESCO, and built a private city on land reclaimed from the sea.

His net worth, according to various estimates, stands at approximately $4.5 billion, making him one of the wealthiest individuals in Nigeria—even though more than half his income reportedly comes from Nigeria itself.

Yet the man himself remains strangely elusive. He rarely talks to reporters. In his rare public statements—such as the 2016 response to the Clinton email revelations—his spokesman insisted he "doesn't understand all of the media concern" and that he was merely "passing along his observations and insights about the dire political situation in Lebanon at the time". The image cultivated is of a quiet philanthropist, a diplomat, a man who happens to be present at the highest levels of global power because of his business acumen and charitable work.

But the documentary record tells a different story, of a man who has repeatedly operated at the very edge of legality—and sometimes beyond it—to maintain his position. It is a story of how, in a political system where competitive bidding is an afterthought and executive discretion is near‑absolute, a single individual can, over decades, accumulate the power to shape the physical and economic landscape of an entire nation.

The Lagos‑Calabar Coastal Highway is under construction. Eko Atlantic's towers rise higher each year, their glass façades reflecting the Atlantic Ocean that once covered the land on which they stand. On Banana Island, one of Africa's most exclusive addresses, the ultra‑wealthy live in homes built by the Chagoury Group, protected behind high walls from the megacity's turbulent streets. And every morning, somewhere in the world—whether in Lagos, Paris, Geneva, or Washington—an 80‑year‑old Lebanese‑Nigerian billionaire wakes to the reality that he has, once again, survived.

The question that lingers is not whether Gilbert Chagoury is a hero or a villain. It is why Nigeria—a nation of more than 200 million people, rich in oil, rich in talent, rich in democratic aspiration—has repeatedly produced a system in which a single "man with no title and no office" can hold so many keys. Until that question is answered, the gatekeepers will continue to outlast the presidents.

Courtesy of: Target Blog News Media Publications

FINAL KAMEL AND KNAT SATIRE NEWS STORY FOR THE WEEK

WARNING! Rated G-PS for POLITICAL SATIRE

The Kamel and Knat

Over 80% of 37 Million Registered Republicans and 34 Million Independents Sign Petition Saying They're Planning a J6 Type Event Called A6

Click Below for Important Details:

https://open.substack.com/pub/kamelandknat/p/over-80-of-37-million-registered?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

Iran's Deception: A Contrast Between Democrats and Republicans

Iran engages in consistent lies and deception, while the political landscape is sharply divided between Democrats and Republicans and one truth becomes a reality of saying vs doing.

WARNING! Rated G-PS for POLITICAL SATIRE

The Kamel and Knat

Democratic Strategist James 'Ragin Cajun" Carville Says Autopen is the Only Democrat That Has a Chance of Defeating Republicans in 2028

Click Below for Interesting Details:

https://open.substack.com/pub/kamelandknat/p/democratic-strategist-james-ragin?r=2u8e73&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

WARNING! Rated G-PS for POLITICAL SATIRE

The Kamel and Knat

Republicans Say Democrats Proposed Bill Outlawing Conspiracy Theories Because So Many of Them Have Come True Hurting the Democrats and Deep State the Most

Click below for more details:

https://open.substack.com/pub/kamelandknat/p/republicans-say-democrats-proposed?r=2u8e73&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

I condemn the hateful comments made by Peter Giunta the former chairman of the New York State Young Republicans. His comments do not reflect the beliefs of the republican party. The republican party supports the Jewish community.

Good morning, everyone. Grace and peace be with you.

Today I am up a tad bit earlier than the rest of this week. Today is visitation day (this afternoon), and I also have Grandparents' Day the day before. My daughter did offer me an out, as it were, because of the circumstances; however, my grandson enjoys these days almost as much as we do. Unfortunately, due to the timing of it all, my husband will not be able to attend the school event.

I saw a news clip this morning that stated something to the effect that had the shooter in the Charlie Kirk incident, simply shot another student … Republicans would not be this involved. I do not remember the post that I saw it on, but this is nothing more than the enemy pushing his divide.

So let me put my spin on this headline, or my 2 cents worth as it were. Just a couple of questions for clarity.

When JFK was assassinated… were only the Democrats mourning?

When MLK was assassinated … who mourned, which party because he was not a member of either?

When McVeigh blew up the day care in Oklahoma City, whose cries were heard the loudest?

How about Columbine High School, which party was more in shock or mourning?

Can you not see that this is not a political thing, but an evil thing?

Whitney Houston overdosed, and President Obama ordered the flags to be flown at half-staff in memorium for her. I, personally, had a lot to say about flying our colors in this manner for an entertainer. An entertainer who, in reality, chose to take their own life. How many other suicides or overdoses have we flown the flag this way for? To the best of my knowledge … none.

My point is this … each political party, each president, each person mourns and shows respect in their own fashion. Why must it be a point of contention every time we open the newspaper? I will tell you why … the enemy knows that if he keeps the fuel to the fire consistently … the damage will eventually become irreparable. That the human mind, once set to a specific conviction, will cease to hear or even consider a second option. We are so close to this now, it is heartbreaking. So how do we fix this?

It is really quite simple. Really. Quit dividing us into us and them. Open up civilized dialogue with facts, not rhetoric. Be willing to ‘hear’ the other side of the aisle that has a difference of opinion. Listen to understand … not to just respond. Agree to disagree in some matters but be willing to hear them out in their thoughts.

I have at least one friend with whom we stand completely on opposite sides of the aisle. Our viewpoints on some issues are so far from each other that one would think that our friendship would be over. However, it is far from that. In fact, our differences are one of the pinnacles of our friendship. We respect each other’s viewpoints, listen to the facts of the situation, are willing to research and confirm the other’s points, and then return for further discussion. Will either of us completely cross the bridge to the other side, not likely. However, that is not required. What is required is that we treat them with love. Yep, that is it …Love.

If God did not want us to have differing opinions, he would not have given us free will to choose. If God wanted us all to BE exactly like him always, he would not have given us free will to choose. The enemy has taken our ability to choose and transformed it into a weapon of mass destruction. Our words and inability to be civilized to those who disagree is more horrible than any nuclear bomb.

A teacher once gave his students a fresh and clean piece of paper to write out all the negative things they had ever been called or had said to them. Once the students finished writing, he had them crumple up the papers and toss them across the room. He then had one student collect one of the balls of paper and read aloud the negative contents. When the student was done, he had each of the students pick up a piece of paper from the floor, smooth it out, and on the back, write positive statements. Though those were very complementary and positive, it did not take away the creases of the crumpled up negative statements.

The negative is out there in such force that the paper is tearing into small pieces. However, it can be repaired, if we are willing to tape it back together one piece at a time. Is it going to be perfect…no. Is it going to be the same ... no. Is it going to be as strong … no …but … it has the potential to be stronger as we tape each piece back together with love.

As you engage your day today, stop before you react to a comment and think about how your reaction will be received. If you know that it will bring on a war, stop and choose your words wisely and try to open up a dialogue of understanding. That is how we tape back together our world.

Be blessed today my friends.

***Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God. – Matthew 5:9

WARNING! Rated G-PS for POLITICAL SATIRE

The Kamel and Knat

Congressional Republicans Tell Democrats They'll Pass One of the Items in Their Bill if the Democrats Take a Hypocrisy 101 Class

Click below for interesting details. If you go there, if you don't want to subscribe for FREE, click on "no thanks."

https://open.substack.com/pub/kamelandknat/p/congressional-republicans-tell-democrats?r=2u8e73&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

There is a lot of evil that has happened in this country in the past couple of months, indeed the past couple of days, and I see people posting blame back and forth with the two main political parties, Democrats pointing their fingers at Republicans,and Republicans at Democrats. My friends that is exactly what the enemy wants. The true reason these things are happening is that it is Satan's plans to cause confusion, distrust, division, hatred and fear, and it seems to be working just as he hoped by the postings I see. Please remember that the people that commit these horrible things are just puppets of the devil, he is the source of all evil and sin in this world not the Democrats, Republicans or Trump or a black or white person, not a nationality legal or illegal, but satan himself, and someday real soon our Lord Jesus Christ will return to take His people home and put an end to sin, error, and evil once and for all. So keep strong in faith and replace anger and hatred with with love for God and love for each other.

37 Jesus said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the first and great commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ 40 On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.”
Mathew 22: 37-40