The flawed logic and reason of the Big Bang put in simple terms.
Image one: The boulder dates 13.8 billions years.
Image two: You blow up the boulder and this is what you get is a bunch of smaller rocks, right? This illustrates all the planet, moons, and stars etc...
Now explain how the smaller rocks date differently from the original boulder without going outside of science?
This is what they want you to believe. You see in the Big Bang idea, the rock dates what it does yet all the matter that came from it does not date the same. How is that scientific?
Image one: The boulder dates 13.8 billions years.
Image two: You blow up the boulder and this is what you get is a bunch of smaller rocks, right? This illustrates all the planet, moons, and stars etc...
Now explain how the smaller rocks date differently from the original boulder without going outside of science?
This is what they want you to believe. You see in the Big Bang idea, the rock dates what it does yet all the matter that came from it does not date the same. How is that scientific?
The flawed logic and reason of the Big Bang put in simple terms.
Image one: The boulder dates 13.8 billions years.
Image two: You blow up the boulder and this is what you get is a bunch of smaller rocks, right? This illustrates all the planet, moons, and stars etc...
Now explain how the smaller rocks date differently from the original boulder without going outside of science?
This is what they want you to believe. You see in the Big Bang idea, the rock dates what it does yet all the matter that came from it does not date the same. How is that scientific?
Arabic
French
Spanish
Portuguese
Deutsch
Turkish
Dutch
Italiano
Russian
Romaian
Portuguese (Brazil)
Greek
हिन्दी