• God's Creation = 100 /evolution = 0
    HOW MANY ANIMALS WERE REALLY ON NOAH'S ARK?

    For decades critics have mocked the Ark with the same worn out claim. “There are millions of species. Noah could never fit them all on a boat.” That argument collapses the moment you look at the actual data and the biblical text instead of outdated evolutionary talking points.

    God told Noah to build a vessel 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high. Using a standard 20.4 inch cubit, that gives you a ship over 510 feet long with nearly two million cubic feet of storage. That is the equivalent of 450 semitrailers. A genuine oceanready vessel built to ride out judgment. Nothing about this was a bathtub toy. It was a massive, functional, cargo carrying ship designed by God Himself.

    Now here is what skeptics never want to admit. Noah was not told to take species. The Bible says kinds. A kind is a broad category from which many species come. Dogs, wolves, dingoes, coyotes. One kind. Horses, zebras, donkeys. One kind. Lions, tigers, leopards. One kind. The vast diversity we see today is simply the unfolding of God’s built in genetic potential after the Flood. No millions of species required.

    The Ark Encounter research team studied hybridization, anatomy, and statistical baraminology to estimate the maximum number of kinds. Their worst case scenario includes fourteen of every flying and clean kind and two of every unclean kind. Even with generous splitting of groups to avoid undercounting, the total is not millions. It is not hundreds of thousands. It is fewer than 7,000 individual animals from roughly 1,400 kinds.

    That means over 98 percent of modern species never needed to board the Ark because they are marine organisms, plants, insects, or non land dependent creatures. Today there are fewer than 34,000 land dependent vertebrate species, and all of those descended from the much smaller number of original Ark kinds. Skeptics quoting inflated “millions of species” are clinging to arguments that collapse the moment Scripture and real biology confront them.

    Now consider this. The vast majority of Ark animals were small. Only about 15 percent would have reached the size of a beagle at adulthood. Juveniles take up less space, eat less, produce less waste, and are easier to manage. With all this factored in, a digital 3D Ark model confirms that animals, food, water, and enclosures fit with room to spare.

    Once again the old objections fall away. Once again the Word of God stands firm.

    Noah did not take millions of species. He took representatives of every created kind exactly as God commanded. They fit. They survived. They replenished the earth.

    Skeptics may cling to outdated assumptions, but Scripture, science, and simple mathematics testify to a different story. God judged the world. God preserved a remnant. God’s Word remains true.
    God's Creation = 100 /evolution = 0 HOW MANY ANIMALS WERE REALLY ON NOAH'S ARK? For decades critics have mocked the Ark with the same worn out claim. “There are millions of species. Noah could never fit them all on a boat.” That argument collapses the moment you look at the actual data and the biblical text instead of outdated evolutionary talking points. God told Noah to build a vessel 300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide, and 30 cubits high. Using a standard 20.4 inch cubit, that gives you a ship over 510 feet long with nearly two million cubic feet of storage. That is the equivalent of 450 semitrailers. A genuine oceanready vessel built to ride out judgment. Nothing about this was a bathtub toy. It was a massive, functional, cargo carrying ship designed by God Himself. Now here is what skeptics never want to admit. Noah was not told to take species. The Bible says kinds. A kind is a broad category from which many species come. Dogs, wolves, dingoes, coyotes. One kind. Horses, zebras, donkeys. One kind. Lions, tigers, leopards. One kind. The vast diversity we see today is simply the unfolding of God’s built in genetic potential after the Flood. No millions of species required. The Ark Encounter research team studied hybridization, anatomy, and statistical baraminology to estimate the maximum number of kinds. Their worst case scenario includes fourteen of every flying and clean kind and two of every unclean kind. Even with generous splitting of groups to avoid undercounting, the total is not millions. It is not hundreds of thousands. It is fewer than 7,000 individual animals from roughly 1,400 kinds. That means over 98 percent of modern species never needed to board the Ark because they are marine organisms, plants, insects, or non land dependent creatures. Today there are fewer than 34,000 land dependent vertebrate species, and all of those descended from the much smaller number of original Ark kinds. Skeptics quoting inflated “millions of species” are clinging to arguments that collapse the moment Scripture and real biology confront them. Now consider this. The vast majority of Ark animals were small. Only about 15 percent would have reached the size of a beagle at adulthood. Juveniles take up less space, eat less, produce less waste, and are easier to manage. With all this factored in, a digital 3D Ark model confirms that animals, food, water, and enclosures fit with room to spare. Once again the old objections fall away. Once again the Word of God stands firm. Noah did not take millions of species. He took representatives of every created kind exactly as God commanded. They fit. They survived. They replenished the earth. Skeptics may cling to outdated assumptions, but Scripture, science, and simple mathematics testify to a different story. God judged the world. God preserved a remnant. God’s Word remains true.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 10 Views
  • A Little Light Reading.
    Who are the sons of God.

    Doug Bachelor.

    October 30, 1938. It was the night
    just before Halloween, and many
    Americans were tuning their radios
    to the Columbia Broadcasting System, which
    had just finished reporting on the weather
    and began playing music. Within moments,
    the broadcast was interrupted by a news flash
    about strange explosions on Mars. The an-
    nouncer reassured the audience that as more
    information became available, more an-
    nouncements would be made. Then the mu-
    sic continued.
    As the night progressed, the music was
    interrupted frequently, now with terrifying
    reports of an invasion. Aliens from Mars had
    landed in New Jersey and in cities around
    the world. The Earth was under a full-scale
    attack. Many listening to the broadcast pan-
    icked, and some even fled their homes for
    the hills.
    But it was all fiction.
    A young Orson Wells had adapted the H.G.
    Wells book War of the Worlds for broadcast
    and modified the script to present the story as
    though it were happening in real time. Many
    listeners took the fiction to be real.
    Those who panicked were operating with
    incomplete information. They had failed to
    hear the station announce at the beginning
    and the end of the broadcast that it was all
    mere drama. Coming in at the middle, hear-
    ing only part of the story, they had no context
    and ran off thinking the sky was falling.
    Similarly, there is a passage in the book of
    Genesis that, when read out of context, has
    caused many to believe the Earth has been in-
    vaded by aliens from outer space. Let’s take a
    look at that puzzling verse:
    And it came to pass, when men began
    to multiply on the face of the earth, and
    daughters were born unto them, that Who Are the Sons of God? 3
    the sons of God saw the daughters of
    men that they were fair; and they took
    them wives of all which they chose
    (Genesis 6:1, 2, emphasis added).
    It’s a phrase that runs all the way through
    the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation: “sons
    of God.” So I think it is important to make
    sure we understand what it is really saying,
    don’t you?
    Some believe that the term “sons of God”
    refers to extraterrestrial invaders. They be-
    lieve that these beings are fallen angels or evil
    aliens from space who took female humans as
    wives and produced some notable offspring.
    They rationalize this belief by saying that this
    is the only explanation for why the progeny
    produced by these unions were “giants” (v. 4).
    They also believe these unholy unions were
    ultimately responsible for the increased wick-
    edness of man that led to the Flood.
    Some Bible translations flat-out say,
    “Some of their daughters were so beauti-
    ful that supernatural beings came down and
    married the ones they wanted” (CEV). This
    translation, however, doesn’t line up very well 4 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    with the original Hebrew. Around the time of
    Christ, moreover, a lot of apocryphal books
    were in circulation; some of these works also
    have these kinds of strange interpretations
    in them.
    For instance, have you heard of the book
    of Enoch? It’s not in the Bible, but it is briefly
    mentioned in the book of Jude. The writer of
    Jude actually quotes a few lines from Enoch,
    which was a popular apocryphal work from
    the time of Christ. (It wasn’t actually written
    by Enoch.) It was a book of fables, similar to
    the more modern The Pilgrim’s Progress.
    Jude pulled a kernel of truth from the
    book of Enoch, but it should not be viewed
    as an endorsement for the veracity of every-
    thing else in the book of Enoch. Likewise, one
    could preach a Spirit-filled sermon while giv-
    ing a quote or two from John Bunyan, sharing
    a small kernel of truth from his allegories. It
    doesn’t mean the stories are true.
    Remember, no Christian religious author-
    ity—the Catholics nor the Protestants—chose
    to put the book of Enoch into the final canon
    of their faiths. They recognized it was more
    mythological than truth, and it certainly was Who Are the Sons of God? 5
    not inspired on an equal level with the Bible,
    if at all.
    Now that you understand its place, here’s
    what the book of Enoch says about the sons
    of God:
    It happened after the sons of men had
    multiplied in those days and daughters
    were born to them elegant and beau-
    tiful and when the angels, the sons of
    heaven beheld them, they became en-
    amored of them and they said to each
    other, come, let us select ourselves
    wives from the prodigy of men and let
    us beget children (7:1).
    Some of the early church leaders read this
    line, blinked twice, and figured it might have
    indeed happened that way. As a result, some
    of God’s people have never totally shaken this
    fable from their set of beliefs. However, it is a
    fanciful interpretation that, if taken seriously,
    actually causes enormous problems with a lot
    of other Bible teachings.
    In fact, there is another important reason
    to understand this passage. The things that 6 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    happen in Genesis 6, the first few verses espe-
    cially, reflect the conditions of the world that
    led to the destruction of the Earth by a flood
    in the time of Noah. And these things are be-
    ing repeated in our day. So it is good for us
    to understand what the Bible is really saying
    here and what it is not saying.
    On the surface, claiming that the “sons
    of God” refers to fallen angels might seem to
    be an intriguing conclusion. But as we shall
    see, without understanding the context that
    surrounds this passage, you can actually be
    confused into believing that certain myths
    are real.
    If there’s ever any confusion about what
    Scripture tells us, it’s generally due to a lack
    of information. When the religious leaders
    were confused about marriage in heaven,
    Jesus said to them, “Do ye not therefore err,
    because ye know not the scriptures, neither
    the power of God?” (Mark 12:24). In other
    words, Jesus is saying here, “You don’t un-
    derstand what I’m saying because you don’t
    know the Word of God.” Fortunately, we can
    clear up any confusion regarding the sons of
    God quite easily by gathering a little more Who Are the Sons of God? 7
    information from the Bible and comparing
    Scripture with Scripture.
    Angels Are Spirits
    The King James Bible uses the term
    “sons of God” 11 times in two primary ways.
    However, it never uses the term to refer to an
    angelic being.
    “Who maketh his angels spirits” (Psalm
    104:4). Angels are spirits; they are not flesh. They
    are all around us now, but we cannot see them.
    They generally remain in their spiritual form
    and have very little physical integration in our
    world—they don’t go to school, get jobs, or raise
    families. They are here to “minister for them who
    shall be heirs of salvation” (Hebrews 1:14).
    Even if they wanted to marry and have
    babies, they couldn’t; they don’t have human
    DNA. It would be easier for a jellyfish to mar-
    ry a mountain goat than for angels to marry
    people. Thus, it doesn’t make any practical
    sense to believe that our passage in Genesis
    refers to the marriage of angels, fallen or holy,
    to humans.
    Angels are not born; they are created. If
    God wanted more angels, He wouldn’t need 8 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    to marry them off to humans or other an-
    gels to reproduce. He could create them from
    scratch. Speaking of Lucifer, God said, “The
    workmanship of your timbrels and pipes was
    prepared for you on the day you were created
    (Ezekiel 28:13 NKJV, emphasis added).
    Moreover, Jesus tells us plainly that angels
    do not marry. Marriage is a uniquely human
    institution, reserved for mankind. “For in the
    resurrection they neither marry, nor are giv-
    en in marriage, but are as the angels of God
    in heaven” (Matthew 22:30). Mark and Luke
    suggest the same thing: “Neither can they die
    any more: for they are equal unto the angels;
    and are the children of God” (Luke 20:36;
    some translations render it “sons of God”).
    Notice here that Jesus makes a distinction be-
    tween angels and sons of God. They are classi-
    fied separately, which means they are not the
    same thing.
    So if the sons of God are not angels, then
    who or what are they?
    Cosmic Life?
    While the sons of God in our passage were
    not space invaders, the Bible does appear to Who Are the Sons of God? 9
    teach that there is other life out there in the
    cosmos. It is clear in Scripture that Jesus made
    other planets: God “has in these last days spo-
    ken to us by His Son, whom He has appoint-
    ed heir of all things, through whom also He
    made the worlds” (Hebrews 1:2 NKJV).
    In the parable of the lost sheep, the Earth
    represents the one lost sheep, a wandering
    world that went astray, the one Christ came
    to save. It’s easy to imagine that God, in His
    infinite existence, created other worlds with
    other physical beings. Of course, we know
    He had seraphim and cherubim and other
    angels prior to our world, so at a minimum
    we know there are at least those extrater-
    restrial creatures. “For by Him all things
    were created that are in heaven and that are
    on earth” (Colossians 1:16 NKJV). “And ev-
    ery creature which is in heaven and on the
    earth … I heard saying: ‘Blessing and honor
    and glory and power be to Him who sits on
    the throne, and to the Lamb, forever and
    ever!’” (Revelation 5:13 NKJV).
    However, it is more than likely that most
    of these other created beings do not visit this
    world. You might say that the Earth is infected 10 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    with a deadly contagious disease called sin,
    and we are quarantined. The only ones al-
    lowed to go into a quarantined hospital ward
    are the hospital staff; in this case, God is the
    head physician, and His angels are the minis-
    tering spirits.
    Princes of Planets
    Thousands of years ago, an intriguing “out
    of this world” meeting took place in heaven.
    “Now there was a day when the sons of God
    came to present themselves before the Lord,
    and Satan came also among them” (Job 1:6).
    In attendance at this meeting are sons of
    God, as well as Satan himself. Satan says that
    he has come from the Earth. The sons of God
    were there representing their unfallen worlds
    in God’s universe. Satan was there to repre-
    sent the Earth.
    Why would Satan be representing our
    world? Originally, Adam had dominion over
    the Earth. He was created by God to subdue
    and manage it. God said to Adam and Eve,
    “Have dominion over the fish of the sea, over
    the fowl of the air, and over every living thing
    that moveth upon the earth” (Genesis 1:28). Who Are the Sons of God? 11
    While Adam was in obedience to God, he
    enjoyed headship over the world. But once
    Adam sinned and obeyed Satan, that domin-
    ion was forfeited to the enemy. “To whom you
    present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that
    one’s slaves whom you obey, whether of sin
    leading to death, or of obedience leading to
    righteousness” (Romans 6:16 NKJV).
    Even Jesus referred to Satan as “the prince
    of this world” (John 12:31). In fact, in Matthew
    4:8–10, Satan offers to transfer dominion of
    the Earth to Jesus—if Jesus would only bow
    down and worship him. It makes sense that
    Satan could not give away dominion of the
    Earth if it wasn’t his to give. So when God
    calls a meeting of world governors, or “sons
    of God,” Satan attends to represent the Earth.
    In the Gospel of Luke, the genealogy of
    Jesus is traced all the way back to Adam.
    Notice what Luke says about this lineage: “the
    son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which
    was the son of Adam, which was the son of
    God” (Luke 3:38, emphasis added).
    The difference between Seth and Adam
    is the bellybutton. Adam was created by the
    hand of God; Seth was born of Eve. Adam 12 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    was the son of God, created to have dominion
    over the Earth. Thus, one definition for sons
    of God is those beings God Himself created
    to have dominion over the worlds He made.
    These beings were not born but were created
    directly by God.
    Job 38:7 tells us that when our world was
    created, “the morning stars sang together,
    and all the sons of God shouted for joy.” The
    “morning stars” are angels, whereas “the sons
    of God” are the leaders of other worlds. (See
    Revelation 1:20.)
    With that cleared up, let’s talk about the
    second way the term “sons of God” is used.
    Heirs of Righteousness
    The other meaning of sons of God refers
    to human beings who have been recreated by
    God’s Spirit.
    “For as many as are led by the Spirit of
    God, they are the sons of God” (Romans 8:14).
    Matthew 5:9 adds, “Blessed are the peace-
    makers, for they shall be called sons of God”
    (NKJV). Here Jesus is obviously referring to
    human beings, but not just any human beings;
    these are peacemakers, the righteous children Who Are the Sons of God? 13
    of God. In no way should this be construed to
    refer to angels or aliens.
    “But as many as received him, to them gave
    he power to become the sons of God, even to
    them that believe on his name” (John 1:12).
    Notice that there were those who were not
    sons of God, but that through receiving Him
    became sons of God. “For as many as are led
    by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God”
    (Romans 8:14).
    It should be mentioned that “sons of God”
    doesn’t mean just males. Many Bible trans-
    lations render the phrase “children of God.”
    Galatians 3:26 says, “For ye are all the chil-
    dren of God by faith in Christ Jesus.” It is by
    faith that a man or woman becomes a “child
    of God.” And, of course, some verses do men-
    tion God’s adopted sons and daughters. “Even
    to them I will give in My house and within
    My walls a place and a name better than that
    of sons and daughters; I will give them an
    everlasting name that shall not be cut off ”
    (Isaiah 56:5 NKJV).
    To redeem them that were under the
    law, that we might receive the adoption 14 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    of sons. And because ye are sons, God
    hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son
    into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father.
    Wherefore thou art no more a ser-
    vant, but a son; and if a son, then an
    heir through of God through Christ
    (Galatians 4:5–7; see also Isaiah 56:5;
    Philippians 2:15).
    The inescapable conclusion from these
    verses and others is that “the sons of God”
    in Genesis 6 refers to the righteous children
    of God.
    Daughters of Men
    This would mean the term “daughters of
    men,” used in Genesis 6, refers to the daugh-
    ters of the unrighteous children of men, or
    those human beings who do not call on the
    name of the Lord. In the context of our Bible
    passage, “daughters of men” refers to the off-
    spring of Cain and his wife.
    Before moving on, I’d like to tackle one
    of the most popular questions skeptics enjoy
    posing about the Bible; that is, “Where did
    Cain’s wife come from?” This is yet another Who Are the Sons of God? 15
    example where you just need to keep reading
    to get your answer. Genesis 5:4 tells us that
    Adam and Eve had many sons and daugh-
    ters. If you lived 930 years, like Adam, and if
    you were healthy, fertile, and reproductive for
    only 20 percent of your life, you would still
    have around 200 childbearing years. With
    God’s command to be fruitful and multiply,
    no doubt Adam and Eve’s progeny became
    quite numerous.
    Considering the near perfect vitality
    and health experienced by the first genera-
    tions … well, they probably had throngs of
    children. So Cain undoubtedly took one of
    his many sisters as his wife. At this point in
    Bible history, when man’s genetic vitality was
    at its peak, there was nothing forbidding the
    practice. Abraham married his half-sister
    (Genesis 20:2). Isaac married his cousin. It
    was not until the time of Moses that mar-
    rying a sister was forbidden, likely because
    of the greater risk of genetic weakness and
    health complications with the offspring
    (Deuteronomy 27:22).
    At first, Adam and Eve had two sons, Cain
    and Abel. Cain murdered Abel, so God gave 16 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    Adam and Eve another son, Seth. He began to
    have children of his own, and they “began to
    call on the name of the Lord” (Genesis 4:25,26
    NKJV). And from what we’ve seen in the
    Bible, those who call on the name of the Lord
    are called the sons of God. “But as many as re-
    ceived him, to them gave he power to become
    the sons of God, even to them that believe on
    his name” (John 1:12). “And it shall come to
    pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of
    the Lord shall be saved” (Acts 2:21).
    Now Cain had been banished from God’s
    presence after he murdered his brother. He
    settled “in the land of Nod, on the east of
    Eden. And Cain knew his wife; and she con-
    ceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city,
    and called the name of the city, after the name
    of his son, Enoch” (Genesis 4:16–18).
    Here, before the Flood, we have the de-
    scendants of Cain living in cities and the de-
    scendants of Seth living in the country. As
    long as they remained separate, the sons of
    God remained pure in their religious beliefs
    and practices.
    However, eventually they began to in-
    termingle. Maybe the sons of God needed Who Are the Sons of God? 17
    supplies that could be more easily obtained
    in the cities where the daughters of men
    resided. The sons of God and daughters of
    men became familiar with each other, even
    friendly. Whatever the case, soon the godly
    sons of Seth, or sons of God, captivated by
    the beautiful daughters of Cain, began to
    marry these “daughters of men,” the descen-
    dants of Cain.
    In other words, the sons of God chose to
    take wives as they desired—women who were
    pleasing to the flesh—without regard to their
    moral character. They ignored good advice
    and likely did not receive the consent of their
    parents, nor did they consult with God and
    consider His will in the matter.
    Mixed Marriages
    It’s even quite possible the sons of God
    went into this situation with good intentions.
    Maybe they believed they could convert these
    daughters of Cain, introducing them to the
    Lord their God. It’s also possible the daugh-
    ters of Cain enticed the sons of God with
    promises, saying they would eventually fol-
    low the Lord. 18 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    However, the counsel of God could not be
    clearer:
    “Be ye not unequally yoked together
    with unbelievers: for what fellowship
    hath righteousness with unrighteous-
    ness? and what communion hath light
    with darkness? And what concord hath
    Christ with Belial? or what part hath
    he that believeth with an infidel? And
    what agreement hath the temple of
    God with idols? for ye are the temple of
    the living God; as God hath said, I will
    dwell in them, and walk in them; and
    I will be their God, and they shall be
    my people. Wherefore come out from
    among them, and be ye separate, saith
    the Lord, and touch not the unclean
    thing; and I will receive you. And will
    be a Father unto you, and ye shall be
    my sons and daughters, saith the Lord
    Almighty” (2 Corinthians 6:14–18).
    God does not want His children marrying
    the unconverted or the unbelieving, even if
    they have a pretty face, the nicest disposition, Who Are the Sons of God? 19
    or a passionate belief in regarding the spiri-
    tual realm. It makes no difference; God says
    that relationship will have problems.
    Praise be to God that He is merciful.
    Sometimes He blesses us in spite of our rebel-
    lion and bad decisions. There have been situa-
    tions in which believers marry unbelievers and
    the unbeliever eventually comes around. It was
    still wrong to get married. The words of God are
    unmistakable: Do not be unequally yoked. But
    with repentance and submission, God forgives.
    If that weren’t true, there would be no hope for
    most of us. God sometimes alleviates the con-
    sequences of our bad choices, but it is unwise
    to knowingly ignore His counsel. You become
    part of the problem that will lead to great wick-
    edness in the world when all the thoughts of
    men’s hearts are only evil continually.
    So the results of these intermarriages were
    not only giants, but sorrow. Instead of the sons
    of God influencing the daughters of men, the
    daughters of men influenced the sons of God.
    Neither shalt thou make marriages
    with them; thy daughter thou shalt
    not give unto his son, nor his daughter 20 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    shalt thou take unto thy son. For they
    will turn away thy son from following
    me, that they may serve other gods: so
    will the anger of the Lord be kindled
    against you, and destroy thee suddenly
    (Deuteronomy 7:3, 4; emphasis added).
    The Bible is filled with stories about the
    sons of God mingling with the daughters of
    men and the disasters that follow as a result.
    Samson, chosen by God, was derailed by the
    Philistine women. His parents pled with him
    to avoid marrying a pagan bride, but he insist-
    ed on having what he wanted. “Then his father
    and mother said to him, ‘Is there no woman
    among the daughters of your brethren, or
    among all my people, that you must go and get
    a wife from the uncircumcised Philistines?’
    And Samson said to his father, ‘Get her for me,
    for she pleases me well’ ” (Judges 14:3).
    Likewise, King Solomon no doubt be-
    lieved that he could marry the daughters from
    pagan nations and, with his unsurpassed wis-
    dom, convert them. However, those pagan
    daughters drew away Solomon’s heart. This
    is why God is so adamant about His children Who Are the Sons of God? 21
    not marrying unbelievers. It is almost al-
    ways the case that the believer is gradually
    transformed by the unbeliever, not the other
    way around.
    Jesus likewise has a warning for us in these
    end-times:
    But as the days of Ayibanuwa Simon Ambakederemo were, so shall
    also the coming of the Son of man be.
    For as in the days that were before the
    flood they were eating and drinking,
    marrying and giving in marriage, un-
    til the day that Ayibanuwa Simon Ambakederemo entered into the
    ark (Matthew 24:37, 38).
    Jesus here is likely referring to the mixed
    marriages of Genesis 6 that brought on the
    universal wickedness leading to the Flood.
    As in Noah’s day, before the Flood, things
    that led to the destruction of the world with
    a deluge by water are going to happen again.
    The pre-Flood events are a preview of what’s
    going to happen before the destruction of the
    world by a flood of fire when Jesus comes
    again. History is going to repeat itself, but we
    don’t have to be among the repeat offenders. 22 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    Polygamy
    Mixed marriages between the sons of God
    and daughters of men were not the only re-
    sult of disobedience. In Genesis 6:2, we read
    that “they took them wives of all which they
    chose.” This is also where polygamy began.
    “And Lamech took unto him two wives:
    the name of the one was Adah, and the name
    of the other Zillah” (Genesis 4:19). Lamech
    was one of the sons of Cain, and he took two
    wives. So it wasn’t just marrying out of one’s
    faith that went against God’s will, it was mar-
    rying more than one person. The sanctity of
    marriage was being lost, even at the begin-
    ning of time.
    This sounds like what’s happening in our
    world today. It’s only gotten worse!
    For instance, a popular American reality
    television program, called Sister Wives, docu-
    ments the life of a polygamist family living
    in Lehi, Utah, which includes the man, Kody
    Brown, his four wives, and their 16 children.
    The Brown family sued the state of Utah be-
    cause of its bigamy laws, claiming they’re a
    violation of their rights based on the First and
    Fourteenth Amendments. The whole nation Who Are the Sons of God? 23
    was watching because the same arguments
    are being used for people who say they’re in
    love with a person of the same gender; with
    that objection out of the way, a person could
    easily claim they are in love with two or three
    or four people.
    When the sons of God rejected the sanc-
    tity of their wedding vows, the peculiarity
    of their faith, the importance of the distinc-
    tion between men and women—one mom,
    one dad, God’s design for a family—violence
    soon filled the land and the thoughts of men’s
    hearts were only evil continually. Jesus says
    this will happen again at the end of time, right
    before the “coming of the Son of man.”
    That time has very much arrived. Turn
    on the television and flip to almost any sta-
    tion; you’re going to see promiscuity, perver-
    sion, divorce, deception, and a whole lot of
    violence. So many programs are built around
    killing and murder, while the sanctity of mar-
    riage is constantly being ridiculed.
    But God says, “My spirit shall not always
    strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his
    days shall be an hundred and twenty years”
    (Genesis 6:3). God looked into the future and 24 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    saw where all this wickedness was leading
    men and determined that it would have to
    end. Christ said later, “And except those days
    should be shortened, there should no flesh be
    saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall
    be shortened” (Matthew 24:22).
    In the end times, God will have to do it
    again for the elect’s sake. For 120 years, the
    Spirit of God, through the preaching and
    example of Noah and his family, strove with
    that generation that was imprisoned by sin.
    They refused to listen. When Noah and his
    family entered the ark and the door was shut,
    there were only eight people inside that still
    believed God. Probation was closed for the
    rest. For seven more days life went on outside
    the ark for that amalgamated race of Cain and
    Seth, whose descendants had sacrificed their
    purity and had given themselves over to evil.
    Are you pure today? God says to you, “My
    spirit will not … always strive with man.” Will
    you listen?
    A Giant Problem
    You might be thinking that I have forgot-
    ten to address the “giants” who were born as a Who Are the Sons of God? 25
    result of the sons of God marrying the daugh-
    ters of men. If the sons of God were merely the
    righteous offspring of Seth and the daughters
    of men were the female descendants of Cain,
    then why were the children of these unions
    giants and mighty men? How do we explain
    the offspring of these unfortunate but human
    marriages?
    Well, I believe it’s a simple law of genetics
    in play called “genetic vitality.”
    First, giants have always been around.
    For example, take Robert Wadlow, born in
    Alton, Illinois, in 1918. At birth he weighed
    a normal eight pounds, six ounces. At six
    months, he weighed 30 pounds. A year lat-
    er, at 18 months, he weighed 62 pounds. He
    wasn’t fat; he was tall. He continued to grow
    at an astounding rate, reaching 6 feet, 2 inch-
    es and 195 pounds by the time he was eight.
    When he was 13, he became the world’s tall-
    est Boy Scout. At 13, he was 7 feet, 4 inches
    tall. Eventually, Robert reached a height of
    nearly 9 feet! (In comparison, Goliath was
    about 9 feet, 6 inches.) Robert’s height ac-
    tually qualified him as the tallest person in
    modern history. 26 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    But this oversize fame wasn’t always easy
    for him. His clothing required three times
    the normal amount of cloth, and his size 37
    shoes cost thousands of dollars a pair—and
    that was back during the Great Depression.
    When Robert turned 20, the International
    Shoe Company provided his shoes for free
    and hired him to promote the company.
    That’s all he did for an income. He visited
    more than 800 towns in 41 states and trav-
    eled 300,000 miles on his goodwill tour.
    The shoe company had to modify a car so
    he could get in, removing the front seat so
    he could sit in the back and stretch out his
    long legs.
    Even though he was of enormous size, he
    was very good natured, intelligent, and gen-
    tle. People were always giving him shocked
    stares. They would ask him, “Does it bother
    you when everyone stares at you?” He would
    reply, “Oh, I just look above it all.” He tried
    to maintain a normal life, enjoying stamp
    collecting and photography. He’d even take
    pictures of people taking pictures of him.
    Robert was a modern-day giant, with no
    need of fallen angels nor aliens to produce Who Are the Sons of God? 27
    him or explain his existence. The giant off-
    spring of the sons of God and daughters of
    men likely resulted from genetic vitality.
    When a people group is isolated for years
    and only intermarry with one another, like
    some Pacific Islanders do, the gene pool be-
    comes restricted and more prone to birth
    defects and genetic abnormalities. After
    several generations of this kind of isolation,
    when they finally marry outside their island
    or tribe, the children of those unions tend to
    be more healthy, robust, and, yes, even big-
    ger. The biggest cats in the world are ligers, a
    hybrid between tigers and lions.
    Adoption Choices
    Not everyone who thinks he or she is a son
    or daughter of God really is.
    The Pharisees, the religious leaders of the
    day, boasted to Jesus that they were the chil-
    dren of Abraham. Jesus corrected them. “If
    ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the
    works of Abraham” (John 8:39). You might
    not get a real sense of how scandalous this
    statement was for Jesus to say when you read
    it at first—but it so publicly embarrassed the 28 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    Pharisees that they eagerly began seeking His
    death. But Jesus didn’t stop there …
    Jesus said unto them, If God were your
    Father, ye would love me: for I proceed-
    ed forth and came from God; neither
    came I of myself, but he sent me. Why
    do ye not understand my speech? even
    because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are
    of your father the devil, and the lusts of
    your father ye will do (John 8:42–44).
    This is a simple principle to test our true
    heritage. Which “father” do we follow in our
    actions? The Pharisees were leaders in the
    church, yet that did not give them security.
    Just being a member of a synagogue or just
    being Jewish did not make them children of
    God. Today, just by being on the books in
    your church does not make you a son or a
    daughter of God. Instead, we are the children
    of the one whom we obey. Whose desires we
    do, that is our father, whether of righteous-
    ness or of sin (Romans 6:16).
    That’s pretty serious. So whose child are
    you? Are you a child of God? Who Are the Sons of God? 29
    When we are born again and are adopted
    into the family of God, we will want to imitate
    our heavenly Father. “He who says he abides
    in Him ought himself also to walk just as He
    walked” (1 John 2:6 NKJV).
    If you are not a son or daughter of God
    now, the wonderful news is that you can
    choose a new family.
    By faith Moses, when he became of
    age, refused to be called the son of
    Pharaoh’s daughter, choosing rather
    to suffer affliction with the people of
    God than to enjoy the passing plea-
    sures of sin, esteeming the reproach of
    Christ greater riches than the treasures
    in Egypt; for he looked to the reward
    (Hebrews 11:24–26 NKJV).
    When called by God, Moses traded in
    his Egyptian adoption for a heavenly one.
    Through Jesus, you can too.
    When the fullness of the time had
    come, God sent forth His Son, born
    of a woman, born under the law, to 30 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted:
    redeem those who were under the
    law, that we might receive the adop-
    tion as sons. And because you are
    sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of
    His Son into your hearts, crying out,
    “Abba, Father!” Therefore you are no
    longer a slave but a son, and if a son,
    then an heir of God through Christ
    (Galatians 4:4–7 NKJV).
    Jaycee Lee Dugard was 11 years old when
    she was kidnapped at a bus stop on June
    10, 1991, by Phillip Garrido and his wife
    Nancy. She was kept in a soundproof shack
    that was isolated from public view. Cruelly
    held as a slave, she also fathered children for
    the Garridos for 18 years. After a while, this
    circumstance became normal for her. It be-
    came ordinary. She had come to believe that
    she was part of the Garrido family, but she
    later found out what kind of fiends Phillip
    and Nancy really were. Fortunately, she was
    eventually discovered and delivered from
    that terrible condition and was reintroduced
    to her real family. Talk about a total change
    of a life! Who Are the Sons of God? 31
    Similarly, the devil has kidnapped a lot of
    people in this world who should be children
    of God. He’s taken them and abused them,
    and he has manipulated them into thinking
    they are with their true family. They are con-
    vinced that the lies of the devil are the truth,
    that he is their friend. Phillip Garrido made
    that claim over Jaycee. Perhaps even you have
    gotten so used to the devil, you think you are
    part of his family. You have become comfort-
    able having him around. But he’s a kidnapper,
    an abuser. You’ve got to wake up and hear
    Jesus saying that you can be free.
    Phillip Garrido was sentenced to 431 years
    in prison. His wife was sentenced to 36 years.
    Jaycee received a $20 million settlement from
    the state, plus a big book deal. She’ll probably
    be okay financially if she manages her money
    well for the rest of her life. What a change of
    fortune from living in a hovel in some per-
    vert’s backyard—to being liberated, finding
    your real family, living a clean life, living a
    normal life, and suddenly going from poverty
    to riches. What a radical transformation!
    That’s what the Lord wants to do for us.
    Right now, you can choose to be a child of
    the King, an heir of eternal life, and become
    a son or daughter of God in whom He is well
    pleased! Just ask Him.
    A Little Light Reading. Who are the sons of God. Doug Bachelor. October 30, 1938. It was the night just before Halloween, and many Americans were tuning their radios to the Columbia Broadcasting System, which had just finished reporting on the weather and began playing music. Within moments, the broadcast was interrupted by a news flash about strange explosions on Mars. The an- nouncer reassured the audience that as more information became available, more an- nouncements would be made. Then the mu- sic continued. As the night progressed, the music was interrupted frequently, now with terrifying reports of an invasion. Aliens from Mars had landed in New Jersey and in cities around the world. The Earth was under a full-scale attack. Many listening to the broadcast pan- icked, and some even fled their homes for the hills. But it was all fiction. A young Orson Wells had adapted the H.G. Wells book War of the Worlds for broadcast and modified the script to present the story as though it were happening in real time. Many listeners took the fiction to be real. Those who panicked were operating with incomplete information. They had failed to hear the station announce at the beginning and the end of the broadcast that it was all mere drama. Coming in at the middle, hear- ing only part of the story, they had no context and ran off thinking the sky was falling. Similarly, there is a passage in the book of Genesis that, when read out of context, has caused many to believe the Earth has been in- vaded by aliens from outer space. Let’s take a look at that puzzling verse: And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that Who Are the Sons of God? 3 the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose (Genesis 6:1, 2, emphasis added). It’s a phrase that runs all the way through the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation: “sons of God.” So I think it is important to make sure we understand what it is really saying, don’t you? Some believe that the term “sons of God” refers to extraterrestrial invaders. They be- lieve that these beings are fallen angels or evil aliens from space who took female humans as wives and produced some notable offspring. They rationalize this belief by saying that this is the only explanation for why the progeny produced by these unions were “giants” (v. 4). They also believe these unholy unions were ultimately responsible for the increased wick- edness of man that led to the Flood. Some Bible translations flat-out say, “Some of their daughters were so beauti- ful that supernatural beings came down and married the ones they wanted” (CEV). This translation, however, doesn’t line up very well 4 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: with the original Hebrew. Around the time of Christ, moreover, a lot of apocryphal books were in circulation; some of these works also have these kinds of strange interpretations in them. For instance, have you heard of the book of Enoch? It’s not in the Bible, but it is briefly mentioned in the book of Jude. The writer of Jude actually quotes a few lines from Enoch, which was a popular apocryphal work from the time of Christ. (It wasn’t actually written by Enoch.) It was a book of fables, similar to the more modern The Pilgrim’s Progress. Jude pulled a kernel of truth from the book of Enoch, but it should not be viewed as an endorsement for the veracity of every- thing else in the book of Enoch. Likewise, one could preach a Spirit-filled sermon while giv- ing a quote or two from John Bunyan, sharing a small kernel of truth from his allegories. It doesn’t mean the stories are true. Remember, no Christian religious author- ity—the Catholics nor the Protestants—chose to put the book of Enoch into the final canon of their faiths. They recognized it was more mythological than truth, and it certainly was Who Are the Sons of God? 5 not inspired on an equal level with the Bible, if at all. Now that you understand its place, here’s what the book of Enoch says about the sons of God: It happened after the sons of men had multiplied in those days and daughters were born to them elegant and beau- tiful and when the angels, the sons of heaven beheld them, they became en- amored of them and they said to each other, come, let us select ourselves wives from the prodigy of men and let us beget children (7:1). Some of the early church leaders read this line, blinked twice, and figured it might have indeed happened that way. As a result, some of God’s people have never totally shaken this fable from their set of beliefs. However, it is a fanciful interpretation that, if taken seriously, actually causes enormous problems with a lot of other Bible teachings. In fact, there is another important reason to understand this passage. The things that 6 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: happen in Genesis 6, the first few verses espe- cially, reflect the conditions of the world that led to the destruction of the Earth by a flood in the time of Noah. And these things are be- ing repeated in our day. So it is good for us to understand what the Bible is really saying here and what it is not saying. On the surface, claiming that the “sons of God” refers to fallen angels might seem to be an intriguing conclusion. But as we shall see, without understanding the context that surrounds this passage, you can actually be confused into believing that certain myths are real. If there’s ever any confusion about what Scripture tells us, it’s generally due to a lack of information. When the religious leaders were confused about marriage in heaven, Jesus said to them, “Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?” (Mark 12:24). In other words, Jesus is saying here, “You don’t un- derstand what I’m saying because you don’t know the Word of God.” Fortunately, we can clear up any confusion regarding the sons of God quite easily by gathering a little more Who Are the Sons of God? 7 information from the Bible and comparing Scripture with Scripture. Angels Are Spirits The King James Bible uses the term “sons of God” 11 times in two primary ways. However, it never uses the term to refer to an angelic being. “Who maketh his angels spirits” (Psalm 104:4). Angels are spirits; they are not flesh. They are all around us now, but we cannot see them. They generally remain in their spiritual form and have very little physical integration in our world—they don’t go to school, get jobs, or raise families. They are here to “minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation” (Hebrews 1:14). Even if they wanted to marry and have babies, they couldn’t; they don’t have human DNA. It would be easier for a jellyfish to mar- ry a mountain goat than for angels to marry people. Thus, it doesn’t make any practical sense to believe that our passage in Genesis refers to the marriage of angels, fallen or holy, to humans. Angels are not born; they are created. If God wanted more angels, He wouldn’t need 8 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: to marry them off to humans or other an- gels to reproduce. He could create them from scratch. Speaking of Lucifer, God said, “The workmanship of your timbrels and pipes was prepared for you on the day you were created (Ezekiel 28:13 NKJV, emphasis added). Moreover, Jesus tells us plainly that angels do not marry. Marriage is a uniquely human institution, reserved for mankind. “For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are giv- en in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven” (Matthew 22:30). Mark and Luke suggest the same thing: “Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God” (Luke 20:36; some translations render it “sons of God”). Notice here that Jesus makes a distinction be- tween angels and sons of God. They are classi- fied separately, which means they are not the same thing. So if the sons of God are not angels, then who or what are they? Cosmic Life? While the sons of God in our passage were not space invaders, the Bible does appear to Who Are the Sons of God? 9 teach that there is other life out there in the cosmos. It is clear in Scripture that Jesus made other planets: God “has in these last days spo- ken to us by His Son, whom He has appoint- ed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds” (Hebrews 1:2 NKJV). In the parable of the lost sheep, the Earth represents the one lost sheep, a wandering world that went astray, the one Christ came to save. It’s easy to imagine that God, in His infinite existence, created other worlds with other physical beings. Of course, we know He had seraphim and cherubim and other angels prior to our world, so at a minimum we know there are at least those extrater- restrial creatures. “For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth” (Colossians 1:16 NKJV). “And ev- ery creature which is in heaven and on the earth … I heard saying: ‘Blessing and honor and glory and power be to Him who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb, forever and ever!’” (Revelation 5:13 NKJV). However, it is more than likely that most of these other created beings do not visit this world. You might say that the Earth is infected 10 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: with a deadly contagious disease called sin, and we are quarantined. The only ones al- lowed to go into a quarantined hospital ward are the hospital staff; in this case, God is the head physician, and His angels are the minis- tering spirits. Princes of Planets Thousands of years ago, an intriguing “out of this world” meeting took place in heaven. “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them” (Job 1:6). In attendance at this meeting are sons of God, as well as Satan himself. Satan says that he has come from the Earth. The sons of God were there representing their unfallen worlds in God’s universe. Satan was there to repre- sent the Earth. Why would Satan be representing our world? Originally, Adam had dominion over the Earth. He was created by God to subdue and manage it. God said to Adam and Eve, “Have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth” (Genesis 1:28). Who Are the Sons of God? 11 While Adam was in obedience to God, he enjoyed headship over the world. But once Adam sinned and obeyed Satan, that domin- ion was forfeited to the enemy. “To whom you present yourselves slaves to obey, you are that one’s slaves whom you obey, whether of sin leading to death, or of obedience leading to righteousness” (Romans 6:16 NKJV). Even Jesus referred to Satan as “the prince of this world” (John 12:31). In fact, in Matthew 4:8–10, Satan offers to transfer dominion of the Earth to Jesus—if Jesus would only bow down and worship him. It makes sense that Satan could not give away dominion of the Earth if it wasn’t his to give. So when God calls a meeting of world governors, or “sons of God,” Satan attends to represent the Earth. In the Gospel of Luke, the genealogy of Jesus is traced all the way back to Adam. Notice what Luke says about this lineage: “the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God” (Luke 3:38, emphasis added). The difference between Seth and Adam is the bellybutton. Adam was created by the hand of God; Seth was born of Eve. Adam 12 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: was the son of God, created to have dominion over the Earth. Thus, one definition for sons of God is those beings God Himself created to have dominion over the worlds He made. These beings were not born but were created directly by God. Job 38:7 tells us that when our world was created, “the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy.” The “morning stars” are angels, whereas “the sons of God” are the leaders of other worlds. (See Revelation 1:20.) With that cleared up, let’s talk about the second way the term “sons of God” is used. Heirs of Righteousness The other meaning of sons of God refers to human beings who have been recreated by God’s Spirit. “For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God” (Romans 8:14). Matthew 5:9 adds, “Blessed are the peace- makers, for they shall be called sons of God” (NKJV). Here Jesus is obviously referring to human beings, but not just any human beings; these are peacemakers, the righteous children Who Are the Sons of God? 13 of God. In no way should this be construed to refer to angels or aliens. “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name” (John 1:12). Notice that there were those who were not sons of God, but that through receiving Him became sons of God. “For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God” (Romans 8:14). It should be mentioned that “sons of God” doesn’t mean just males. Many Bible trans- lations render the phrase “children of God.” Galatians 3:26 says, “For ye are all the chil- dren of God by faith in Christ Jesus.” It is by faith that a man or woman becomes a “child of God.” And, of course, some verses do men- tion God’s adopted sons and daughters. “Even to them I will give in My house and within My walls a place and a name better than that of sons and daughters; I will give them an everlasting name that shall not be cut off ” (Isaiah 56:5 NKJV). To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption 14 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: of sons. And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. Wherefore thou art no more a ser- vant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir through of God through Christ (Galatians 4:5–7; see also Isaiah 56:5; Philippians 2:15). The inescapable conclusion from these verses and others is that “the sons of God” in Genesis 6 refers to the righteous children of God. Daughters of Men This would mean the term “daughters of men,” used in Genesis 6, refers to the daugh- ters of the unrighteous children of men, or those human beings who do not call on the name of the Lord. In the context of our Bible passage, “daughters of men” refers to the off- spring of Cain and his wife. Before moving on, I’d like to tackle one of the most popular questions skeptics enjoy posing about the Bible; that is, “Where did Cain’s wife come from?” This is yet another Who Are the Sons of God? 15 example where you just need to keep reading to get your answer. Genesis 5:4 tells us that Adam and Eve had many sons and daugh- ters. If you lived 930 years, like Adam, and if you were healthy, fertile, and reproductive for only 20 percent of your life, you would still have around 200 childbearing years. With God’s command to be fruitful and multiply, no doubt Adam and Eve’s progeny became quite numerous. Considering the near perfect vitality and health experienced by the first genera- tions … well, they probably had throngs of children. So Cain undoubtedly took one of his many sisters as his wife. At this point in Bible history, when man’s genetic vitality was at its peak, there was nothing forbidding the practice. Abraham married his half-sister (Genesis 20:2). Isaac married his cousin. It was not until the time of Moses that mar- rying a sister was forbidden, likely because of the greater risk of genetic weakness and health complications with the offspring (Deuteronomy 27:22). At first, Adam and Eve had two sons, Cain and Abel. Cain murdered Abel, so God gave 16 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: Adam and Eve another son, Seth. He began to have children of his own, and they “began to call on the name of the Lord” (Genesis 4:25,26 NKJV). And from what we’ve seen in the Bible, those who call on the name of the Lord are called the sons of God. “But as many as re- ceived him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name” (John 1:12). “And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved” (Acts 2:21). Now Cain had been banished from God’s presence after he murdered his brother. He settled “in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden. And Cain knew his wife; and she con- ceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch” (Genesis 4:16–18). Here, before the Flood, we have the de- scendants of Cain living in cities and the de- scendants of Seth living in the country. As long as they remained separate, the sons of God remained pure in their religious beliefs and practices. However, eventually they began to in- termingle. Maybe the sons of God needed Who Are the Sons of God? 17 supplies that could be more easily obtained in the cities where the daughters of men resided. The sons of God and daughters of men became familiar with each other, even friendly. Whatever the case, soon the godly sons of Seth, or sons of God, captivated by the beautiful daughters of Cain, began to marry these “daughters of men,” the descen- dants of Cain. In other words, the sons of God chose to take wives as they desired—women who were pleasing to the flesh—without regard to their moral character. They ignored good advice and likely did not receive the consent of their parents, nor did they consult with God and consider His will in the matter. Mixed Marriages It’s even quite possible the sons of God went into this situation with good intentions. Maybe they believed they could convert these daughters of Cain, introducing them to the Lord their God. It’s also possible the daugh- ters of Cain enticed the sons of God with promises, saying they would eventually fol- low the Lord. 18 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: However, the counsel of God could not be clearer: “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteous- ness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you. And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty” (2 Corinthians 6:14–18). God does not want His children marrying the unconverted or the unbelieving, even if they have a pretty face, the nicest disposition, Who Are the Sons of God? 19 or a passionate belief in regarding the spiri- tual realm. It makes no difference; God says that relationship will have problems. Praise be to God that He is merciful. Sometimes He blesses us in spite of our rebel- lion and bad decisions. There have been situa- tions in which believers marry unbelievers and the unbeliever eventually comes around. It was still wrong to get married. The words of God are unmistakable: Do not be unequally yoked. But with repentance and submission, God forgives. If that weren’t true, there would be no hope for most of us. God sometimes alleviates the con- sequences of our bad choices, but it is unwise to knowingly ignore His counsel. You become part of the problem that will lead to great wick- edness in the world when all the thoughts of men’s hearts are only evil continually. So the results of these intermarriages were not only giants, but sorrow. Instead of the sons of God influencing the daughters of men, the daughters of men influenced the sons of God. Neither shalt thou make marriages with them; thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter 20 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: shalt thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from following me, that they may serve other gods: so will the anger of the Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly (Deuteronomy 7:3, 4; emphasis added). The Bible is filled with stories about the sons of God mingling with the daughters of men and the disasters that follow as a result. Samson, chosen by God, was derailed by the Philistine women. His parents pled with him to avoid marrying a pagan bride, but he insist- ed on having what he wanted. “Then his father and mother said to him, ‘Is there no woman among the daughters of your brethren, or among all my people, that you must go and get a wife from the uncircumcised Philistines?’ And Samson said to his father, ‘Get her for me, for she pleases me well’ ” (Judges 14:3). Likewise, King Solomon no doubt be- lieved that he could marry the daughters from pagan nations and, with his unsurpassed wis- dom, convert them. However, those pagan daughters drew away Solomon’s heart. This is why God is so adamant about His children Who Are the Sons of God? 21 not marrying unbelievers. It is almost al- ways the case that the believer is gradually transformed by the unbeliever, not the other way around. Jesus likewise has a warning for us in these end-times: But as the days of [Noah] were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be. For as in the days that were before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, un- til the day that [Noah] entered into the ark (Matthew 24:37, 38). Jesus here is likely referring to the mixed marriages of Genesis 6 that brought on the universal wickedness leading to the Flood. As in Noah’s day, before the Flood, things that led to the destruction of the world with a deluge by water are going to happen again. The pre-Flood events are a preview of what’s going to happen before the destruction of the world by a flood of fire when Jesus comes again. History is going to repeat itself, but we don’t have to be among the repeat offenders. 22 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: Polygamy Mixed marriages between the sons of God and daughters of men were not the only re- sult of disobedience. In Genesis 6:2, we read that “they took them wives of all which they chose.” This is also where polygamy began. “And Lamech took unto him two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other Zillah” (Genesis 4:19). Lamech was one of the sons of Cain, and he took two wives. So it wasn’t just marrying out of one’s faith that went against God’s will, it was mar- rying more than one person. The sanctity of marriage was being lost, even at the begin- ning of time. This sounds like what’s happening in our world today. It’s only gotten worse! For instance, a popular American reality television program, called Sister Wives, docu- ments the life of a polygamist family living in Lehi, Utah, which includes the man, Kody Brown, his four wives, and their 16 children. The Brown family sued the state of Utah be- cause of its bigamy laws, claiming they’re a violation of their rights based on the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The whole nation Who Are the Sons of God? 23 was watching because the same arguments are being used for people who say they’re in love with a person of the same gender; with that objection out of the way, a person could easily claim they are in love with two or three or four people. When the sons of God rejected the sanc- tity of their wedding vows, the peculiarity of their faith, the importance of the distinc- tion between men and women—one mom, one dad, God’s design for a family—violence soon filled the land and the thoughts of men’s hearts were only evil continually. Jesus says this will happen again at the end of time, right before the “coming of the Son of man.” That time has very much arrived. Turn on the television and flip to almost any sta- tion; you’re going to see promiscuity, perver- sion, divorce, deception, and a whole lot of violence. So many programs are built around killing and murder, while the sanctity of mar- riage is constantly being ridiculed. But God says, “My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years” (Genesis 6:3). God looked into the future and 24 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: saw where all this wickedness was leading men and determined that it would have to end. Christ said later, “And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s sake those days shall be shortened” (Matthew 24:22). In the end times, God will have to do it again for the elect’s sake. For 120 years, the Spirit of God, through the preaching and example of Noah and his family, strove with that generation that was imprisoned by sin. They refused to listen. When Noah and his family entered the ark and the door was shut, there were only eight people inside that still believed God. Probation was closed for the rest. For seven more days life went on outside the ark for that amalgamated race of Cain and Seth, whose descendants had sacrificed their purity and had given themselves over to evil. Are you pure today? God says to you, “My spirit will not … always strive with man.” Will you listen? A Giant Problem You might be thinking that I have forgot- ten to address the “giants” who were born as a Who Are the Sons of God? 25 result of the sons of God marrying the daugh- ters of men. If the sons of God were merely the righteous offspring of Seth and the daughters of men were the female descendants of Cain, then why were the children of these unions giants and mighty men? How do we explain the offspring of these unfortunate but human marriages? Well, I believe it’s a simple law of genetics in play called “genetic vitality.” First, giants have always been around. For example, take Robert Wadlow, born in Alton, Illinois, in 1918. At birth he weighed a normal eight pounds, six ounces. At six months, he weighed 30 pounds. A year lat- er, at 18 months, he weighed 62 pounds. He wasn’t fat; he was tall. He continued to grow at an astounding rate, reaching 6 feet, 2 inch- es and 195 pounds by the time he was eight. When he was 13, he became the world’s tall- est Boy Scout. At 13, he was 7 feet, 4 inches tall. Eventually, Robert reached a height of nearly 9 feet! (In comparison, Goliath was about 9 feet, 6 inches.) Robert’s height ac- tually qualified him as the tallest person in modern history. 26 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: But this oversize fame wasn’t always easy for him. His clothing required three times the normal amount of cloth, and his size 37 shoes cost thousands of dollars a pair—and that was back during the Great Depression. When Robert turned 20, the International Shoe Company provided his shoes for free and hired him to promote the company. That’s all he did for an income. He visited more than 800 towns in 41 states and trav- eled 300,000 miles on his goodwill tour. The shoe company had to modify a car so he could get in, removing the front seat so he could sit in the back and stretch out his long legs. Even though he was of enormous size, he was very good natured, intelligent, and gen- tle. People were always giving him shocked stares. They would ask him, “Does it bother you when everyone stares at you?” He would reply, “Oh, I just look above it all.” He tried to maintain a normal life, enjoying stamp collecting and photography. He’d even take pictures of people taking pictures of him. Robert was a modern-day giant, with no need of fallen angels nor aliens to produce Who Are the Sons of God? 27 him or explain his existence. The giant off- spring of the sons of God and daughters of men likely resulted from genetic vitality. When a people group is isolated for years and only intermarry with one another, like some Pacific Islanders do, the gene pool be- comes restricted and more prone to birth defects and genetic abnormalities. After several generations of this kind of isolation, when they finally marry outside their island or tribe, the children of those unions tend to be more healthy, robust, and, yes, even big- ger. The biggest cats in the world are ligers, a hybrid between tigers and lions. Adoption Choices Not everyone who thinks he or she is a son or daughter of God really is. The Pharisees, the religious leaders of the day, boasted to Jesus that they were the chil- dren of Abraham. Jesus corrected them. “If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham” (John 8:39). You might not get a real sense of how scandalous this statement was for Jesus to say when you read it at first—but it so publicly embarrassed the 28 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: Pharisees that they eagerly began seeking His death. But Jesus didn’t stop there … Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceed- ed forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me. Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do (John 8:42–44). This is a simple principle to test our true heritage. Which “father” do we follow in our actions? The Pharisees were leaders in the church, yet that did not give them security. Just being a member of a synagogue or just being Jewish did not make them children of God. Today, just by being on the books in your church does not make you a son or a daughter of God. Instead, we are the children of the one whom we obey. Whose desires we do, that is our father, whether of righteous- ness or of sin (Romans 6:16). That’s pretty serious. So whose child are you? Are you a child of God? Who Are the Sons of God? 29 When we are born again and are adopted into the family of God, we will want to imitate our heavenly Father. “He who says he abides in Him ought himself also to walk just as He walked” (1 John 2:6 NKJV). If you are not a son or daughter of God now, the wonderful news is that you can choose a new family. By faith Moses, when he became of age, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God than to enjoy the passing plea- sures of sin, esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt; for he looked to the reward (Hebrews 11:24–26 NKJV). When called by God, Moses traded in his Egyptian adoption for a heavenly one. Through Jesus, you can too. When the fullness of the time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, to 30 Aliens, Angels, or Adopted: redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adop- tion as sons. And because you are sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of His Son into your hearts, crying out, “Abba, Father!” Therefore you are no longer a slave but a son, and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ (Galatians 4:4–7 NKJV). Jaycee Lee Dugard was 11 years old when she was kidnapped at a bus stop on June 10, 1991, by Phillip Garrido and his wife Nancy. She was kept in a soundproof shack that was isolated from public view. Cruelly held as a slave, she also fathered children for the Garridos for 18 years. After a while, this circumstance became normal for her. It be- came ordinary. She had come to believe that she was part of the Garrido family, but she later found out what kind of fiends Phillip and Nancy really were. Fortunately, she was eventually discovered and delivered from that terrible condition and was reintroduced to her real family. Talk about a total change of a life! Who Are the Sons of God? 31 Similarly, the devil has kidnapped a lot of people in this world who should be children of God. He’s taken them and abused them, and he has manipulated them into thinking they are with their true family. They are con- vinced that the lies of the devil are the truth, that he is their friend. Phillip Garrido made that claim over Jaycee. Perhaps even you have gotten so used to the devil, you think you are part of his family. You have become comfort- able having him around. But he’s a kidnapper, an abuser. You’ve got to wake up and hear Jesus saying that you can be free. Phillip Garrido was sentenced to 431 years in prison. His wife was sentenced to 36 years. Jaycee received a $20 million settlement from the state, plus a big book deal. She’ll probably be okay financially if she manages her money well for the rest of her life. What a change of fortune from living in a hovel in some per- vert’s backyard—to being liberated, finding your real family, living a clean life, living a normal life, and suddenly going from poverty to riches. What a radical transformation! That’s what the Lord wants to do for us. Right now, you can choose to be a child of the King, an heir of eternal life, and become a son or daughter of God in whom He is well pleased! Just ask Him.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 22 Views
  • Watch nature documentaries on animals, insects, fish, air, cloud, food chain, forests, Barren lands, sea and peculiar creatures in the deep dark sea where light never reach, desert, trees, flowers, even bacteria, space & planets, gravity, Flowers, Exotic birds in nature with magnificent colors which are rarely filmed... It all Testifies the majesty, Creation Intelligence beyond our brains, which is created by The Lord., ...!
    (even though documentary narrators dont give credit to Actual world creater but they certainly praise nature with astonishment , testify withoutrealization, if u can relate to Creater Our Lord and from his prespective, u will see )

    Get a magnifier glass and see closely around u physically, see , any thing on a ground or tress,,even your cats eyes, u will see the extra ordinary design..., And if are u able to see through it..., it all testifies for Our Lord and Father without a doubt,,! including science! and U will praise the Lord for it!
    its All around us , the created itself cries out and testifies.,and u will love all of his creation...including beasts Tigers, lions, big cats and creatures of see.
    Watch nature documentaries on animals, insects, fish, air, cloud, food chain, forests, Barren lands, sea and peculiar creatures in the deep dark sea where light never reach, desert, trees, flowers, even bacteria, space & planets, gravity, Flowers, Exotic birds in nature with magnificent colors which are rarely filmed... It all Testifies the majesty, Creation Intelligence beyond our brains, which is created by The Lord., ...! (even though documentary narrators dont give credit to Actual world creater but they certainly praise nature with astonishment , testify withoutrealization, if u can relate to Creater Our Lord and from his prespective, u will see ) Get a magnifier glass and see closely around u physically, see 🍃, any thing on a ground or tress,,even your cats eyes, u will see the extra ordinary design..., And if are u able to see through it..., it all testifies for Our Lord and Father without a doubt,,! including science! and U will praise the Lord for it! its All around us , the created itself cries out and testifies.,and u will love all of his creation...including beasts Tigers, lions, big cats and creatures of see.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 27 Views
  • The Created Kinds: The True History of Biological Variation
    The modern educational system insists upon a singular definition of the word “evolution”—one that demands a slow, upward climb from a primordial spark of life to the complexity of the human form. This paradigm asserts that all living creatures share a common, microscopic ancestor. Yet, when the structural data of the natural world is examined through the lens of Scripture, a completely different biological mechanism is revealed. It is a process not of upward evolution, but of rapid, lateral variation within strictly defined boundaries established at the dawn of creation.

    "And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was very good."
    — Genesis 1:25
    The foundational law of biblical biology is the stability of the “kind” (Hebrew: mîn). In the original economy of creation, the Almighty did not create the endless array of specific varieties we see today. Instead, He engineered ancestral archetypes—original parental stocks packed with a vast, pristine reservoir of genetic information.

    These original kinds were deliberately designed with an immense capacity for variation, allowing their offspring to adapt to shifting post-Flood climates, terrains, and food sources without ever transforming into a completely different type of organism.

    The Genesis Cargo: Minimizing the Ark’s Burden
    A common objection raised against the biblical account of the Noachian Deluge concerns the sheer volume of animals required to fit aboard the Ark. Critics imagine millions of modern species crammed into the vessel. This confusion stems entirely from a failure to understand the difference between a modern “species” and a biblical “kind.”

    "Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive."
    — Genesis 6:20
    Noah was not commanded to gather every modern breed, variant, or subspecies of animal. He did not need two German Shepherds, two Poodles, two Coyotes, and two Grey Wolves. He required only a single pair of the canid kind.

    From that single pair of ancestral dogs, the entire diversity of the canine family emerged after the Flood. The same principle applied across the board:

    The Canid Kind: One pair of ancestral wolves/dogs gave rise to wolves, coyotes, jackals, dingoes, and domestic dogs.
    The Felid Kind: One pair of ancestral cats gave rise to lions, tigers, leopards, cougars, and house cats.
    The Ursid Kind: One pair of ancestral bears gave rise to Polar bears, Grizzly bears, Black bears, and Pandas.
    By bringing only the ancestral kinds aboard the Ark—representing roughly a few thousand distinct families rather than millions of species—the space within the vessel was more than sufficient to preserve terrestrial life during the global judgment.

    The Mechanism: Rapid Sorting, Not New Information
    The diversification that occurred after the Ark settled on the mountains of Ararat is often mislabeled by secular textbooks as “micro-evolution.” However, the mechanical reality of this process is entirely distinct from Darwinian theory.

    Darwinian evolution requires the introduction of new genetic information over millions of years through random mutations—effectively turning a fish into an amphibian by adding blueprints that did not previously exist.

    The biblical model relies on information loss and specialization. The ancestral pair that walked off the Ark possessed a hyper-complex genome containing all the dominant and recessive traits for their entire lineage. As their descendants migrated across the fractured post-Flood earth, populations became isolated. Natural selection acted as a culling tool, sorting existing traits based on environmental pressures.

    When a segment of the ancestral dog population migrated into frigid northern climates, those with genetic combinations for thick fur survived and passed on those specific genes. Those with genes for short hair perished or migrated south. Over generations, the genetic pool became specialized. The thick-haired dogs became wolves; the short-haired, large-eared dogs became desert foxes.

    No new information was created; rather, the original, rich genetic library was divided and specialized into distinct branches. A Poodle and a Chihuahua are not products of evolutionary advancement; they are highly specialized, genetically depleted variations of an original wolf-like ancestor.

    The Scientific Witness: Defending the Boundaries
    This model of rapid, post-Flood diversification within created kinds is not a theological myth; it is a position held by credentialed, rigorous scientists who reject the molecules-to-man paradigm while affirming the immense capacity for variation within genetic boundaries.

    Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson (Cell and Developmental Biology, Harvard University)
    Dr. Jeanson’s extensive research into mitochondrial DNA clock rates demonstrates that the genetic diversity observed within modern species does not require millions of years. His work shows that the genetic markers found in modern human and animal populations track back to a massive bottleneck roughly 4,500 years ago—perfectly aligning with the timeline of the post-Flood migration. Jeanson argues that the original kinds were created with “front-loaded” genetic variety, allowing for the rapid triggering of new breeds within centuries, not eons.

    Dr. Kurt Wise (Paleontology, Harvard University)
    A student of the famed evolutionary paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, Dr. Wise developed the field of baraminology (the study of created kinds). His work focuses on identifying the boundaries of the original created stocks through fossil and genetic data. Wise demonstrates that the fossil record consistently shows the sudden appearance of complex, fully formed families—such as the cat family or the horse family—followed by rapid diversification within that family, rather than a slow transition from one major animal group to another.

    Dr. Georgia Purdom (Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University)
    Dr. Purdom’s research centers on cellular mechanics and mutations. She has consistently demonstrated that observed genetic mutations in the laboratory result in a loss of functional information or a breakdown of existing systems, never the creation of novel corporate structures. Her work reinforces the biblical reality that variation operates strictly downhill from a state of original perfection, proving that while a dog can vary into a dingo, it lacks the genetic mechanism to ever become anything other than a dog.

    The biological diversity that fills our forests, oceans, and homes is not a monument to random chance or upward evolutionary progress. It is a profound testimony to the foresight of the Creator, who front-loaded His creation with the genetic wealth necessary to survive and multiply across a changing world, while stamping an permanent boundary upon every kind.
    The Created Kinds: The True History of Biological Variation The modern educational system insists upon a singular definition of the word “evolution”—one that demands a slow, upward climb from a primordial spark of life to the complexity of the human form. This paradigm asserts that all living creatures share a common, microscopic ancestor. Yet, when the structural data of the natural world is examined through the lens of Scripture, a completely different biological mechanism is revealed. It is a process not of upward evolution, but of rapid, lateral variation within strictly defined boundaries established at the dawn of creation. "And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was very good." — Genesis 1:25 The foundational law of biblical biology is the stability of the “kind” (Hebrew: mîn). In the original economy of creation, the Almighty did not create the endless array of specific varieties we see today. Instead, He engineered ancestral archetypes—original parental stocks packed with a vast, pristine reservoir of genetic information. These original kinds were deliberately designed with an immense capacity for variation, allowing their offspring to adapt to shifting post-Flood climates, terrains, and food sources without ever transforming into a completely different type of organism. The Genesis Cargo: Minimizing the Ark’s Burden A common objection raised against the biblical account of the Noachian Deluge concerns the sheer volume of animals required to fit aboard the Ark. Critics imagine millions of modern species crammed into the vessel. This confusion stems entirely from a failure to understand the difference between a modern “species” and a biblical “kind.” "Of fowls after their kind, and of cattle after their kind, of every creeping thing of the earth after his kind, two of every sort shall come unto thee, to keep them alive." — Genesis 6:20 Noah was not commanded to gather every modern breed, variant, or subspecies of animal. He did not need two German Shepherds, two Poodles, two Coyotes, and two Grey Wolves. He required only a single pair of the canid kind. From that single pair of ancestral dogs, the entire diversity of the canine family emerged after the Flood. The same principle applied across the board: The Canid Kind: One pair of ancestral wolves/dogs gave rise to wolves, coyotes, jackals, dingoes, and domestic dogs. The Felid Kind: One pair of ancestral cats gave rise to lions, tigers, leopards, cougars, and house cats. The Ursid Kind: One pair of ancestral bears gave rise to Polar bears, Grizzly bears, Black bears, and Pandas. By bringing only the ancestral kinds aboard the Ark—representing roughly a few thousand distinct families rather than millions of species—the space within the vessel was more than sufficient to preserve terrestrial life during the global judgment. The Mechanism: Rapid Sorting, Not New Information The diversification that occurred after the Ark settled on the mountains of Ararat is often mislabeled by secular textbooks as “micro-evolution.” However, the mechanical reality of this process is entirely distinct from Darwinian theory. Darwinian evolution requires the introduction of new genetic information over millions of years through random mutations—effectively turning a fish into an amphibian by adding blueprints that did not previously exist. The biblical model relies on information loss and specialization. The ancestral pair that walked off the Ark possessed a hyper-complex genome containing all the dominant and recessive traits for their entire lineage. As their descendants migrated across the fractured post-Flood earth, populations became isolated. Natural selection acted as a culling tool, sorting existing traits based on environmental pressures. When a segment of the ancestral dog population migrated into frigid northern climates, those with genetic combinations for thick fur survived and passed on those specific genes. Those with genes for short hair perished or migrated south. Over generations, the genetic pool became specialized. The thick-haired dogs became wolves; the short-haired, large-eared dogs became desert foxes. No new information was created; rather, the original, rich genetic library was divided and specialized into distinct branches. A Poodle and a Chihuahua are not products of evolutionary advancement; they are highly specialized, genetically depleted variations of an original wolf-like ancestor. The Scientific Witness: Defending the Boundaries This model of rapid, post-Flood diversification within created kinds is not a theological myth; it is a position held by credentialed, rigorous scientists who reject the molecules-to-man paradigm while affirming the immense capacity for variation within genetic boundaries. Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson (Cell and Developmental Biology, Harvard University) Dr. Jeanson’s extensive research into mitochondrial DNA clock rates demonstrates that the genetic diversity observed within modern species does not require millions of years. His work shows that the genetic markers found in modern human and animal populations track back to a massive bottleneck roughly 4,500 years ago—perfectly aligning with the timeline of the post-Flood migration. Jeanson argues that the original kinds were created with “front-loaded” genetic variety, allowing for the rapid triggering of new breeds within centuries, not eons. Dr. Kurt Wise (Paleontology, Harvard University) A student of the famed evolutionary paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, Dr. Wise developed the field of baraminology (the study of created kinds). His work focuses on identifying the boundaries of the original created stocks through fossil and genetic data. Wise demonstrates that the fossil record consistently shows the sudden appearance of complex, fully formed families—such as the cat family or the horse family—followed by rapid diversification within that family, rather than a slow transition from one major animal group to another. Dr. Georgia Purdom (Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University) Dr. Purdom’s research centers on cellular mechanics and mutations. She has consistently demonstrated that observed genetic mutations in the laboratory result in a loss of functional information or a breakdown of existing systems, never the creation of novel corporate structures. Her work reinforces the biblical reality that variation operates strictly downhill from a state of original perfection, proving that while a dog can vary into a dingo, it lacks the genetic mechanism to ever become anything other than a dog. The biological diversity that fills our forests, oceans, and homes is not a monument to random chance or upward evolutionary progress. It is a profound testimony to the foresight of the Creator, who front-loaded His creation with the genetic wealth necessary to survive and multiply across a changing world, while stamping an permanent boundary upon every kind.
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 22 Views
  • GOD'S CREATION = 100 / evolution = 0
    Designed by God, Not Domesticated by Man: Why Dogs Are Unlike Wolves.

    If you go to a circus show, you’ll see lions, tigers, and bears—but have you ever wondered why there are no wolves? Wolves are never used in circus shows because their aggressive nature makes them impossible to control or bond with humans. And yet, evolutionists claim that primitive humans somehow managed to turn these same wild predators into obedient, loyal dogs.

    Evolutionists claim that around 15,000 years ago, humans not only domesticated wolves but also selectively bred and genetically altered them to create the obedient, loyal dogs we know today. But there is no evidence for this: no fossils, no records, and no explanation of how humans could safely control or genetically manipulate such dangerous animals.

    The challenge was enormous. Wolves are muscular hunters, built for survival in harsh wilderness. Their heightened senses and instincts for hunting make them very aggressive and unpredictable. Even skilled modern trainers cannot reliably tame or bond with them. Turning a wolf’s natural ferocity into the docile, obedient, and socially attuned behavior of a dog would require knowledge and control far beyond what humans then—or even now—possess.

    The distinction goes deeper than behavior. Wolves lack the genetic blueprint for traits dogs naturally possess: floppy ears, short snouts, varied coat colors, and the social intelligence needed to bond with humans. These traits are innate, not learned, and cannot be created by humans—they must already exist in the animal’s design. The very characteristics that make dogs loyal companions—obedience, adaptability, and sociability—point unmistakably to intentional creation rather than gradual human manipulation.

    From the earliest human communities to modern homes, dogs reveal God’s deliberate design. Genesis 1:25 declares that God made animals “according to their kinds,” and dogs embody traits perfectly suited for companionship, work, and service to humans. Wolves remain wild predators, while dogs, present in every culture where humans live, demonstrate a Creator’s wisdom—fashioned for care, partnership, and loyalty from the very beginning.
    GOD'S CREATION = 100 / evolution = 0 Designed by God, Not Domesticated by Man: Why Dogs Are Unlike Wolves. If you go to a circus show, you’ll see lions, tigers, and bears—but have you ever wondered why there are no wolves? Wolves are never used in circus shows because their aggressive nature makes them impossible to control or bond with humans. And yet, evolutionists claim that primitive humans somehow managed to turn these same wild predators into obedient, loyal dogs. Evolutionists claim that around 15,000 years ago, humans not only domesticated wolves but also selectively bred and genetically altered them to create the obedient, loyal dogs we know today. But there is no evidence for this: no fossils, no records, and no explanation of how humans could safely control or genetically manipulate such dangerous animals. The challenge was enormous. Wolves are muscular hunters, built for survival in harsh wilderness. Their heightened senses and instincts for hunting make them very aggressive and unpredictable. Even skilled modern trainers cannot reliably tame or bond with them. Turning a wolf’s natural ferocity into the docile, obedient, and socially attuned behavior of a dog would require knowledge and control far beyond what humans then—or even now—possess. The distinction goes deeper than behavior. Wolves lack the genetic blueprint for traits dogs naturally possess: floppy ears, short snouts, varied coat colors, and the social intelligence needed to bond with humans. These traits are innate, not learned, and cannot be created by humans—they must already exist in the animal’s design. The very characteristics that make dogs loyal companions—obedience, adaptability, and sociability—point unmistakably to intentional creation rather than gradual human manipulation. From the earliest human communities to modern homes, dogs reveal God’s deliberate design. Genesis 1:25 declares that God made animals “according to their kinds,” and dogs embody traits perfectly suited for companionship, work, and service to humans. Wolves remain wild predators, while dogs, present in every culture where humans live, demonstrate a Creator’s wisdom—fashioned for care, partnership, and loyalty from the very beginning.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 13 Views

  • Payday Will be Someday I have no doubt .

    pastor James
    “Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.” Ecclesiastes 8:11
    The small, but quick, ocelot exited his barred cage, and strutted down the penned hallway. Past the leopards he went. A quick snarl stirred the dozing tigers, as he continued past their prisons.

    Just before he got to the yard where he would bask in the sun, and attempt to chase darting birds, he stopped at the zoo’s cage of an aged lion, hopelessly staring out through the bars from his cage. The small cat snarled aggressively at the 550-pound African killer, but there was nothing the King of Beasts could do from his captivity. After a while, the 20-pound South American predator moved on to get his breath of fresh, outside air.

    For months, the small, wiry bully daily passed the sedate beast. Sometimes the lion was growled at. Sometimes the small feline’s quick swipes made contact with the lion, leaving small slices into the beast’s thick coat. Blood was sometimes drawn, giving the smaller predator more confidence in his ability to attack his penned enemy; knowing that he was safe, as the lion was behind bars.

    One day, as was his habit, the ocelot continued his attack on the beast. He snarled. He lashed out at the giant predator with his much smaller claws. However, on that day and unbeknownst to the aggressor, things were different. The King of the Jungle’s cage door was open.

    Without any warning to the smaller feline, the big cat quickly pounced, swiping his massive paws at the smaller enemy. It took one swipe, and the lion got his revenge, as clawed weapons swiped the ocelot’s head from off his body. The little feline never knew what killed him.

    A bloody, gruesome story, but it is not unlike what so many people experience. They believe, because they can get away with sin once, twice, and maybe for years that they are exempt from any repercussions from their sinful activity.

    Wrong! No one gets away with any sin. Lightning may not strike the child when he lied to his parent. A teenager may not have been thrown into jail when he did not get caught damaging another’s property. One’s short drinking binge did not land them in a rehab. A husband’s peeking at pornography on the internet was not observed by his wife.

    There are always repercussions of sin, maybe not at the time of commission, but they will come. Sin has its wages — someday! If not in this life, there will be regrets in the next.

    One doing a long prison term usually did not get there from one crime. Most likely small sins desensitized his conscience, allowing him to do more and more; until one day he was caught.

    A married man may have taken private, second looks at other women, maybe a glance or two at a friend’s pornography. Before long, the wages of an adulterous relationship may have resulted in a divorce, breaking the hearts of the wife and children.

    Lying lips may have told a little “white lie”. Since there were no apparent repercussions, the sin was easier to commit the second, third, and many, many more times. Years later the liar looked around and realized that he was friendless and lonely because all those that trusted him had fled because of his dishonesty and deceit.

    On and on the list of repercussions of sin can go. Each of us most likely has experienced the unwelcome, unexpected side effects of our own sins. We have also seen its wages in others’ lives. No one gets away from sin’s consequences. There will be a payday someday for our sin. Flee sin now, while there is still an opportunity to escape regrets that may come to soon!
    “Therefore shall his calamity come suddenly; suddenly shall he be broken without remedy.”
    Proverbs 6:15
    “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also
    reap.” Gal. 6:7

    God Loves You So Do I
    Payday Will be Someday I have no doubt . pastor James “Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.” Ecclesiastes 8:11 The small, but quick, ocelot exited his barred cage, and strutted down the penned hallway. Past the leopards he went. A quick snarl stirred the dozing tigers, as he continued past their prisons. Just before he got to the yard where he would bask in the sun, and attempt to chase darting birds, he stopped at the zoo’s cage of an aged lion, hopelessly staring out through the bars from his cage. The small cat snarled aggressively at the 550-pound African killer, but there was nothing the King of Beasts could do from his captivity. After a while, the 20-pound South American predator moved on to get his breath of fresh, outside air. For months, the small, wiry bully daily passed the sedate beast. Sometimes the lion was growled at. Sometimes the small feline’s quick swipes made contact with the lion, leaving small slices into the beast’s thick coat. Blood was sometimes drawn, giving the smaller predator more confidence in his ability to attack his penned enemy; knowing that he was safe, as the lion was behind bars. One day, as was his habit, the ocelot continued his attack on the beast. He snarled. He lashed out at the giant predator with his much smaller claws. However, on that day and unbeknownst to the aggressor, things were different. The King of the Jungle’s cage door was open. Without any warning to the smaller feline, the big cat quickly pounced, swiping his massive paws at the smaller enemy. It took one swipe, and the lion got his revenge, as clawed weapons swiped the ocelot’s head from off his body. The little feline never knew what killed him. A bloody, gruesome story, but it is not unlike what so many people experience. They believe, because they can get away with sin once, twice, and maybe for years that they are exempt from any repercussions from their sinful activity. Wrong! No one gets away with any sin. Lightning may not strike the child when he lied to his parent. A teenager may not have been thrown into jail when he did not get caught damaging another’s property. One’s short drinking binge did not land them in a rehab. A husband’s peeking at pornography on the internet was not observed by his wife. There are always repercussions of sin, maybe not at the time of commission, but they will come. Sin has its wages — someday! If not in this life, there will be regrets in the next. One doing a long prison term usually did not get there from one crime. Most likely small sins desensitized his conscience, allowing him to do more and more; until one day he was caught. A married man may have taken private, second looks at other women, maybe a glance or two at a friend’s pornography. Before long, the wages of an adulterous relationship may have resulted in a divorce, breaking the hearts of the wife and children. Lying lips may have told a little “white lie”. Since there were no apparent repercussions, the sin was easier to commit the second, third, and many, many more times. Years later the liar looked around and realized that he was friendless and lonely because all those that trusted him had fled because of his dishonesty and deceit. On and on the list of repercussions of sin can go. Each of us most likely has experienced the unwelcome, unexpected side effects of our own sins. We have also seen its wages in others’ lives. No one gets away from sin’s consequences. There will be a payday someday for our sin. Flee sin now, while there is still an opportunity to escape regrets that may come to soon! “Therefore shall his calamity come suddenly; suddenly shall he be broken without remedy.” Proverbs 6:15 “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Gal. 6:7 God Loves You So Do I
    Like
    Love
    2
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 75 Views
  • HOW DID ANIMALS REACH THE ARK?
    A CLOSER LOOK AT WHAT SCRIPTURE ACTUALLY SAYS.

    Skeptics love to throw out challenges about the animals that boarded Noah’s Ark. They ask how a sloth could crawl across continents, how a giant tortoise could lumber such a great distance, or how a flightless bird like the ostrich could possibly make it to the Ark. But these objections crumble the moment we stop trusting human guesses and start paying attention to the biblical record itself.

    1. GOD HIMSELF BROUGHT THE ANIMALS TO NOAH

    Scripture removes the mystery right away. Genesis 6:20 says the animals “shall come in to you.” That means Noah did not need to be a zookeeper, a tracker, or an expert wrangler. He did not need to search for males and females or round up anything. The Creator who made the animals guided them directly to Noah, in exactly the pairs needed to preserve life. The movement was intentional, directed, and providential. God brought them.

    2. NOAH TOOK ANIMAL KINDS, NOT EVERY MODERN SPECIES

    Another misconception is that Noah had to stuff millions of modern species onto the Ark. The Bible does not say that. God sent representatives of each kind of land dwelling, air breathing animal and bird. One pair from every unclean kind. Seven from every clean kind. A kind is a broader category than a species. In many cases a kind lines up with what we would call a family today. Sometimes it may line up slightly above or below that level.

    This means Noah only needed a pair from the dog kind, not wolves, coyotes, dingoes, foxes, jackals, and every breed of domesticated dog. In the same way, the cat kind did not require lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars, cheetahs, and every smaller cat. One pair of the original kind was enough. From those kinds came the variety we see today. The Ark was not overloaded. It was organized exactly the way God designed it.

    3. BEFORE THE FLOOD THE WORLD WAS ONE CONNECTEE LANDMASS

    People often imagine today’s world when they picture animals getting to the Ark. Continents separated by wide oceans. Vast climate zones that divide habitats. But the Bible paints a very different picture of the pre flood world. Genesis 1 describes the land gathered together into one place. No scattering of continents. No great oceans dividing creatures. Just one enormous supercontinent.

    When the fountains of the great deep burst forth in Genesis 7:11, the earth’s crust ruptured and the modern continents began forming toward the end of the Flood. Before that moment, animals lived on a single connected landmass. They did not need to swim across oceans or survive polar climates or scale frozen mountains. With a warm, tropical to semitropical environment, creatures could live almost anywhere on the supercontinent. That means God likely sent animals from regions close to the Ark’s location, not from thousands of miles away.

    Many kinds may have lived only a short journey from where the Ark stood. Walking or flying to Noah would not have required impossible migrations or extreme distances.

    THE MAIN POINT

    When the biblical details are allowed to speak for themselves, the problem vanishes.

    The confusion only arises when people add modern assumptions to an ancient world that did not look like ours.

    When we recognize that God Himself brought the animals,that Noah took kinds rather than species, and the pre flood world was one connected landmass, then the question of how animals reached the Ark becomes simple and reasonable. And above all, it reminds us to cling to Scripture, not to human speculation. Colossians 2:8 warns us not to be carried away by man made ideas that stand against the truth of God. The Ark was built for one purpose. To preserve life so that humans and animals could multiply across the earth after the Flood. God accomplished exactly what He promised.
    HOW DID ANIMALS REACH THE ARK? A CLOSER LOOK AT WHAT SCRIPTURE ACTUALLY SAYS. Skeptics love to throw out challenges about the animals that boarded Noah’s Ark. They ask how a sloth could crawl across continents, how a giant tortoise could lumber such a great distance, or how a flightless bird like the ostrich could possibly make it to the Ark. But these objections crumble the moment we stop trusting human guesses and start paying attention to the biblical record itself. 1. GOD HIMSELF BROUGHT THE ANIMALS TO NOAH Scripture removes the mystery right away. Genesis 6:20 says the animals “shall come in to you.” That means Noah did not need to be a zookeeper, a tracker, or an expert wrangler. He did not need to search for males and females or round up anything. The Creator who made the animals guided them directly to Noah, in exactly the pairs needed to preserve life. The movement was intentional, directed, and providential. God brought them. 2. NOAH TOOK ANIMAL KINDS, NOT EVERY MODERN SPECIES Another misconception is that Noah had to stuff millions of modern species onto the Ark. The Bible does not say that. God sent representatives of each kind of land dwelling, air breathing animal and bird. One pair from every unclean kind. Seven from every clean kind. A kind is a broader category than a species. In many cases a kind lines up with what we would call a family today. Sometimes it may line up slightly above or below that level. This means Noah only needed a pair from the dog kind, not wolves, coyotes, dingoes, foxes, jackals, and every breed of domesticated dog. In the same way, the cat kind did not require lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars, cheetahs, and every smaller cat. One pair of the original kind was enough. From those kinds came the variety we see today. The Ark was not overloaded. It was organized exactly the way God designed it. 3. BEFORE THE FLOOD THE WORLD WAS ONE CONNECTEE LANDMASS People often imagine today’s world when they picture animals getting to the Ark. Continents separated by wide oceans. Vast climate zones that divide habitats. But the Bible paints a very different picture of the pre flood world. Genesis 1 describes the land gathered together into one place. No scattering of continents. No great oceans dividing creatures. Just one enormous supercontinent. When the fountains of the great deep burst forth in Genesis 7:11, the earth’s crust ruptured and the modern continents began forming toward the end of the Flood. Before that moment, animals lived on a single connected landmass. They did not need to swim across oceans or survive polar climates or scale frozen mountains. With a warm, tropical to semitropical environment, creatures could live almost anywhere on the supercontinent. That means God likely sent animals from regions close to the Ark’s location, not from thousands of miles away. Many kinds may have lived only a short journey from where the Ark stood. Walking or flying to Noah would not have required impossible migrations or extreme distances. THE MAIN POINT When the biblical details are allowed to speak for themselves, the problem vanishes. The confusion only arises when people add modern assumptions to an ancient world that did not look like ours. When we recognize that God Himself brought the animals,that Noah took kinds rather than species, and the pre flood world was one connected landmass, then the question of how animals reached the Ark becomes simple and reasonable. And above all, it reminds us to cling to Scripture, not to human speculation. Colossians 2:8 warns us not to be carried away by man made ideas that stand against the truth of God. The Ark was built for one purpose. To preserve life so that humans and animals could multiply across the earth after the Flood. God accomplished exactly what He promised.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 12 Views
  • Sts. Simon and Jude

    They both were among the twelve Apostles lived with Jesus. They occupied the 10th and 11th place in the list of twelve apostles of Jesus. In Persia they converted the king and about sixty thousand persons to Christianity. The king of Persia respected them more for the reason that they over powered two ferocious tigers that were terrorizing the public. They both preached Gospel in Mesopotamia and Persia.

    St. Simon is mentioned in all the Gospels. In one of the Gospels he is called as "the Zealot". Zealots were a group of Jews with extreme Jewish nationalism. He is depicted in art with a saw, by which he was martyred. He preached in Egypt, Spain and Libya. He is the patron saint of couriers, saw men, sawyers and tanners.

    St. Jude was a legal cousin of Jesus Christ. He was the nephew of St. Joseph through his father Alpheus. Jude is the name we see in the Gospel of Luke and in the Acts, which is also written by Luke. But as per the Gospels of Mathew and Mark, his name is mentioned as Thaddeus. He was the apostle who asked Jesus at the last supper that why He (Jesus) chose to reveal Himself to the disciples only. The meaning of the word Thaddeus is "strong man". He was the brother of James. He is the author of a short epistle in the New Testament. He was killed in Armenia. He is the patron saint of hospital workers and hospitals. He is also called as the saint of last resort. Hence he may be prayed in desperate situations, for forgotten causes, to achieve impossible causes and for lost causes.
    Sts. Simon and Jude They both were among the twelve Apostles lived with Jesus. They occupied the 10th and 11th place in the list of twelve apostles of Jesus. In Persia they converted the king and about sixty thousand persons to Christianity. The king of Persia respected them more for the reason that they over powered two ferocious tigers that were terrorizing the public. They both preached Gospel in Mesopotamia and Persia. St. Simon is mentioned in all the Gospels. In one of the Gospels he is called as "the Zealot". Zealots were a group of Jews with extreme Jewish nationalism. He is depicted in art with a saw, by which he was martyred. He preached in Egypt, Spain and Libya. He is the patron saint of couriers, saw men, sawyers and tanners. St. Jude was a legal cousin of Jesus Christ. He was the nephew of St. Joseph through his father Alpheus. Jude is the name we see in the Gospel of Luke and in the Acts, which is also written by Luke. But as per the Gospels of Mathew and Mark, his name is mentioned as Thaddeus. He was the apostle who asked Jesus at the last supper that why He (Jesus) chose to reveal Himself to the disciples only. The meaning of the word Thaddeus is "strong man". He was the brother of James. He is the author of a short epistle in the New Testament. He was killed in Armenia. He is the patron saint of hospital workers and hospitals. He is also called as the saint of last resort. Hence he may be prayed in desperate situations, for forgotten causes, to achieve impossible causes and for lost causes.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 12 Views
  • Sports fans—what’s your top moment of the season? Lions’ grit, Tigers’ clutch plays, or something else? Share your fave and why it hit home! #DetroitSports #FanPride
    Sports fans—what’s your top moment of the season? Lions’ grit, Tigers’ clutch plays, or something else? Share your fave and why it hit home! #DetroitSports #FanPride
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 10 Views