• The master in the parable never defended himself, the servant called him hard, reaping where he didn't sow, the master just let that belief expose itself. We do the same with God.

    Like Adam, we accuse him, without ever understanding his heart, David, Samson, Jacob, rule-breakers, every one. Grace still pursued them.

    Not because it didn't cost them, but because his commitment to them was never about their performance.

    Peter didn't figure out who Jesus was. It was revealed to him, every message about Jesus, that's from God, every message about image, wealth, tradition that's man.

    God won't force it on you, but don't miss the journey of knowing him.

    Full message link: https://youtu.be/d8nuh7NWxoU?si=k7wIQtfWoy97uYFE

    #GraceCultureChurch #FinishedWork #IdentityInChrist #GraceNotWorks
    The master in the parable never defended himself, the servant called him hard, reaping where he didn't sow, the master just let that belief expose itself. We do the same with God. Like Adam, we accuse him, without ever understanding his heart, David, Samson, Jacob, rule-breakers, every one. Grace still pursued them. Not because it didn't cost them, but because his commitment to them was never about their performance. Peter didn't figure out who Jesus was. It was revealed to him, every message about Jesus, that's from God, every message about image, wealth, tradition that's man. God won't force it on you, but don't miss the journey of knowing him. ✨ 🔗 Full message link: https://youtu.be/d8nuh7NWxoU?si=k7wIQtfWoy97uYFE #GraceCultureChurch #FinishedWork #IdentityInChrist #GraceNotWorks
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 237 Views 1
  • What is LOVE ?
    When Someone Does not have Money to give or Other Materials to Give, Does it mean that the person Don't love?
    We are leaving in this part of the World were Love is no longer a feeling from the heart. people describe Love by Money. when you don't have money, The see you as a stingy person.
    I believe good people in LordsBook will help us out to give a proper definition of love.

    Please Share your View of Love
    What does love mean to you ?

    When do you know you're truly in love?
    Do you believe love alone is enough to sustain a relationship?

    What makes you feel most loved?
    What is your love language?
    About Relationships
    What do you value most in a partner?
    What are your deal-breakers in a relationship?
    How do you handle disagreements with someone you love?

    What does commitment mean to you?
    What are your expectations in a serious relationship?

    About the Future
    Do you want to get married someday?
    What kind of family do you hope to have?

    Where do you see yourself in five or ten years?

    What role should faith play in a relationship?

    How do you think couples can keep love alive after many years?

    Personal Reflection
    What has love taught you?
    Have you ever had your heart broken? What did you learn from it?
    What's your biggest fear in a relationship?
    What qualities do you admire most in your ideal partner?
    What does a healthy relationship look like to you?

    These questions encourage meaningful conversations and can help each an everyone of us to understand a person's values, expectations, and emotional maturity. Listen carefully to the answers, and be willing to share your own honestly. May God guide us.
    What is LOVE ? When Someone Does not have Money 💰 to give or Other Materials to Give, Does it mean that the person Don't love? We are leaving in this part of the World were Love is no longer a feeling from the heart. people describe Love by Money. when you don't have money, The see you as a stingy person. I believe good people in LordsBook will help us out to give a proper definition of love. Please Share your View of Love What does love mean to you ? When do you know you're truly in love? Do you believe love alone is enough to sustain a relationship? What makes you feel most loved? What is your love language? About Relationships What do you value most in a partner? What are your deal-breakers in a relationship? How do you handle disagreements with someone you love? What does commitment mean to you? What are your expectations in a serious relationship? About the Future Do you want to get married someday? What kind of family do you hope to have? Where do you see yourself in five or ten years? What role should faith play in a relationship? How do you think couples can keep love alive after many years? Personal Reflection What has love taught you? Have you ever had your heart broken? What did you learn from it? What's your biggest fear in a relationship? What qualities do you admire most in your ideal partner? What does a healthy relationship look like to you? These questions encourage meaningful conversations and can help each an everyone of us to understand a person's values, expectations, and emotional maturity. Listen carefully to the answers, and be willing to share your own honestly. May God guide us. 🙏🙏
    Like
    1
    1 Commenti 0 condivisioni 54 Views
  • #consecration #breakers #EmmanuellaJeslyn
    #consecration #breakers #EmmanuellaJeslyn
    Like
    2
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 18 Views
  • Amazing Facts.
    Daily Devotionals

    Eternal Bread.

    July 11th, 2026

    It took eighteen bakers working through the night to create the longest loaf of bread in history. Using 2,500 pounds of flour, the bakers made a loaf that was 3,600 feet long—that’s over two-thirds of a mile! The world record breakers from Umberto, Italy, had no problem figuring out what to do with the bread when they finished. The bakers cut it up and served it as a snack to the hundreds of helpers and spectators.

    Every human body demands nutrition to grow and function. The most essential spiritual food in the world to human life is the Word of God. Jesus, who is identified as the Word in John 1:1, referred to Himself as the “bread of life” (John 6:35). He explained, “He who comes to Me shall never hunger.” Christ demonstrated the value of the Word of God when battling the enemy in the wilderness temptations. He quoted Scripture three times to drive away the devil (Matthew 4:1–11).

    How do we become spiritually strong and resistant to Satan? Through a personal, prayerful, and daily study of the Bible, we are able to push back the forces of darkness. “Your word I have hidden in my heart, that I might not sin against You” (Psalm 119:11). Just as our bodies need daily nourishment to maintain our health, so must we daily feed on the Scriptures to build our faith.

    Jesus so identified His words with spiritual life that He once explained, “He who eats this bread will live forever” (John 6:58). People misunderstood Him to mean that people must literally eat His body, but He explained, “The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life” (v. 63). The words of Christ make up the most important bread in history.

    Apply It:

    The next time you eat a meal, thank God for the food found in the Bible— nourishment that leads to eternal life.

    Dig Deeper:

    Exodus 16:1–36; Deuteronomy 8:3; John 6:22–71

    Key Bible Texts
    But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. (Matthew 4:4 KJV)
    Amazing Facts. Daily Devotionals Eternal Bread. July 11th, 2026 It took eighteen bakers working through the night to create the longest loaf of bread in history. Using 2,500 pounds of flour, the bakers made a loaf that was 3,600 feet long—that’s over two-thirds of a mile! The world record breakers from Umberto, Italy, had no problem figuring out what to do with the bread when they finished. The bakers cut it up and served it as a snack to the hundreds of helpers and spectators. Every human body demands nutrition to grow and function. The most essential spiritual food in the world to human life is the Word of God. Jesus, who is identified as the Word in John 1:1, referred to Himself as the “bread of life” (John 6:35). He explained, “He who comes to Me shall never hunger.” Christ demonstrated the value of the Word of God when battling the enemy in the wilderness temptations. He quoted Scripture three times to drive away the devil (Matthew 4:1–11). How do we become spiritually strong and resistant to Satan? Through a personal, prayerful, and daily study of the Bible, we are able to push back the forces of darkness. “Your word I have hidden in my heart, that I might not sin against You” (Psalm 119:11). Just as our bodies need daily nourishment to maintain our health, so must we daily feed on the Scriptures to build our faith. Jesus so identified His words with spiritual life that He once explained, “He who eats this bread will live forever” (John 6:58). People misunderstood Him to mean that people must literally eat His body, but He explained, “The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life” (v. 63). The words of Christ make up the most important bread in history. Apply It: The next time you eat a meal, thank God for the food found in the Bible— nourishment that leads to eternal life. Dig Deeper: Exodus 16:1–36; Deuteronomy 8:3; John 6:22–71 Key Bible Texts But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God. (Matthew 4:4 KJV)
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 10 Views
  • Psalm 42 Why Are You Cast Down, O My Soul?

    To the choirmaster. A Maskil of the Sons of Korah.
    As a deer pants for flowing streams,
    so pants my soul for you, O God.
    My soul thirsts for God,
    for the living God.
    When shall I come and appear before God?
    My tears have been my food
    day and night,
    while they say to me all the day long,
    “Where is your God?”
    These things I remember,
    as I pour out my soul:
    how I would go with the throng
    and lead them in procession to the house of God
    with glad shouts and songs of praise,
    a multitude keeping festival.

    Why are you cast down, O my soul,
    and why are you in turmoil within me?
    Hope in God; for I shall again praise him,
    my salvation 6 and my God.

    My soul is cast down within me;
    therefore I remember you
    from the land of Jordan and of Hermon,
    from Mount Mizar.
    Deep calls to deep
    at the roar of your waterfalls;
    all your breakers and your waves
    have gone over me.
    By day the Lord commands his steadfast love,
    and at night his song is with me,
    a prayer to the God of my life.
    I say to God, my rock:
    “Why have you forgotten me?
    Why do I go mourning
    because of the oppression of the enemy?”
    As with a deadly wound in my bones,
    my adversaries taunt me,
    while they say to me all the day long,
    “Where is your God?”

    Why are you cast down, O my soul,
    and why are you in turmoil within me?
    Hope in God; for I shall again praise him,
    my salvation and my God.
    Psalm 42 Why Are You Cast Down, O My Soul? To the choirmaster. A Maskil of the Sons of Korah. As a deer pants for flowing streams, so pants my soul for you, O God. My soul thirsts for God, for the living God. When shall I come and appear before God? My tears have been my food day and night, while they say to me all the day long, “Where is your God?” These things I remember, as I pour out my soul: how I would go with the throng and lead them in procession to the house of God with glad shouts and songs of praise, a multitude keeping festival. Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you in turmoil within me? Hope in God; for I shall again praise him, my salvation 6 and my God. My soul is cast down within me; therefore I remember you from the land of Jordan and of Hermon, from Mount Mizar. Deep calls to deep at the roar of your waterfalls; all your breakers and your waves have gone over me. By day the Lord commands his steadfast love, and at night his song is with me, a prayer to the God of my life. I say to God, my rock: “Why have you forgotten me? Why do I go mourning because of the oppression of the enemy?” As with a deadly wound in my bones, my adversaries taunt me, while they say to me all the day long, “Where is your God?” Why are you cast down, O my soul, and why are you in turmoil within me? Hope in God; for I shall again praise him, my salvation and my God.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 18 Views
  • “I pray that they will all be one...” We are all parts of one great building. Let us not quarrel with our fellow stones.
— Charles Spurgeon

    Unity matters deeply to the heart of God.

    In John 17, Jesus prayed that His people would be one. Not divided by pride. Not separated by preferences. Not consumed by arguments, comparison, or offense. But united in Him, grounded in truth, and marked by love.

    Spurgeon’s reminder is a powerful one: we are all parts of one great building.

    That means we each have a place. We each have a purpose. We each matter in the work God is doing. Some may be seen more than others, some may carry different responsibilities, and some may serve in quiet ways that few people notice — but every faithful stone has value in the hands of the Master Builder.

    The danger comes when we begin quarreling with our fellow stones instead of trusting the Builder.

    The body of Christ was never meant to be built on competition, criticism, or division. We are called to encourage one another, bear with one another, forgive one another, pray for one another, and work together for the glory of God.

    Unity does not mean we are all the same. It means we are all submitted to the same Lord.

    May our words build up instead of tear down.
May our hearts be quick to forgive.
May our service be marked by humility.
May our churches, homes, ministries, and communities reflect the love of Christ.

    There is too much kingdom work to do for us to waste our strength fighting one another.

    Let us be one — not because we agree on every small thing, but because Jesus is worthy, the Gospel is precious, and love is still the mark of His people.

    “By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.”
— John 13:35

    Lord, help us to be builders, not breakers. Help us love well, forgive freely, and walk in unity for Your glory.

    Stay Connected – A Guy And His Bible

    Website: https://www.patrickryanlewis.com
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AGuyAndHisBible
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aguyandhisbible
    X (Twitter): https://x.com/aguyandhisbible
    TiTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aguyandhisbible

    allthingsforHim.pl@gmail.com
    Text: (681) 534-3585

    Venmo / CashApp @PatrickRyanLewis
    Paypal: https://bit.ly/3TMgPRa
    Stripe: https://bit.ly/3TL5j8F

    Amazon Storefront
    https://www.amazon.com/shop/aguyandhisbible

    Amazon Wishlist
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/AAQACSNG7QKZ?ref_=wl_share

    #UnityInChrist #CharlesSpurgeon #ChristianEncouragement #BodyOfChrist #Faith #LoveOneAnother #KingdomWork #ChurchUnity #BuildEachOtherUp #JesusIsLord
    “I pray that they will all be one...” We are all parts of one great building. Let us not quarrel with our fellow stones.
— Charles Spurgeon Unity matters deeply to the heart of God. In John 17, Jesus prayed that His people would be one. Not divided by pride. Not separated by preferences. Not consumed by arguments, comparison, or offense. But united in Him, grounded in truth, and marked by love. Spurgeon’s reminder is a powerful one: we are all parts of one great building. That means we each have a place. We each have a purpose. We each matter in the work God is doing. Some may be seen more than others, some may carry different responsibilities, and some may serve in quiet ways that few people notice — but every faithful stone has value in the hands of the Master Builder. The danger comes when we begin quarreling with our fellow stones instead of trusting the Builder. The body of Christ was never meant to be built on competition, criticism, or division. We are called to encourage one another, bear with one another, forgive one another, pray for one another, and work together for the glory of God. Unity does not mean we are all the same. It means we are all submitted to the same Lord. May our words build up instead of tear down.
May our hearts be quick to forgive.
May our service be marked by humility.
May our churches, homes, ministries, and communities reflect the love of Christ. There is too much kingdom work to do for us to waste our strength fighting one another. Let us be one — not because we agree on every small thing, but because Jesus is worthy, the Gospel is precious, and love is still the mark of His people. “By this all will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another.”
— John 13:35 🙏 Lord, help us to be builders, not breakers. Help us love well, forgive freely, and walk in unity for Your glory. 🌐 Stay Connected – A Guy And His Bible Website: https://www.patrickryanlewis.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AGuyAndHisBible LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aguyandhisbible X (Twitter): https://x.com/aguyandhisbible TiTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aguyandhisbible allthingsforHim.pl@gmail.com Text: (681) 534-3585 Venmo / CashApp @PatrickRyanLewis Paypal: https://bit.ly/3TMgPRa Stripe: https://bit.ly/3TL5j8F Amazon Storefront https://www.amazon.com/shop/aguyandhisbible Amazon Wishlist https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/AAQACSNG7QKZ?ref_=wl_share #UnityInChrist #CharlesSpurgeon #ChristianEncouragement #BodyOfChrist #Faith #LoveOneAnother #KingdomWork #ChurchUnity #BuildEachOtherUp #JesusIsLord
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 21 Views
  • A Nugget of Truth.
    DID JESUS DIE SO SINNERS COULD KEEP SINNING?

    Many today say:

    “Jesus paid it all—so I am safe no matter how I live.”

    Others say:

    “Once saved, always saved.”

    Others read New Testament verses about ordinances, shadows, meats, drinks, and holy days, then conclude:

    “God’s moral law was nailed to the cross.”

    But let this question shake the conscience:

    Did Jesus die so sinners could keep sinning?
    Did Calvary give permission to continue rebellion?
    Did the blood of Christ cancel holiness?

    GOD FORBID.

    Jesus did not die to make sin safe.
    He died to save us from sin.

    Jesus did not die to excuse rebellion.
    He died to cleanse rebellion.

    Jesus did not die to abolish obedience.
    He died to write obedience in the heart.
    ---

    THE CROSS DID NOT CANCEL GOD’S MORAL LAW

    If God’s moral law ended at the cross, then sin has no definition.

    “For by the law is the knowledge of sin.”
    — Romans 3:20

    “I had not known sin, but by the law.”
    — Romans 7:7

    “Sin is the transgression of the law.”
    — 1 John 3:4

    If there is no law, there is no transgression.
    If there is no transgression, there is no sin.
    If there is no sin, there is no need of repentance.
    If there is no repentance, there is no cleansing.

    That is why Satan wants the law removed from the conscience.

    Because when God’s law is silenced, sin feels comfortable.

    The cross did not destroy God’s law—
    the cross revealed how deadly breaking that law really is.
    ---

    CEREMONIAL LAW ENDED AT THE CROSS—NOT THE MORAL LAW

    The Bible shows two different things many people confuse.

    CEREMONIAL LAW

    This included:

    animal sacrifices, feast shadows, circumcision as a covenant requirement, meats, drinks, washings, earthly priesthood, and temple ordinances.

    These pointed forward to Christ.

    “Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.”
    — Colossians 2:17

    “For the law having a shadow of good things to come…”
    — Hebrews 10:1

    “Meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.”
    — Hebrews 9:10

    When Jesus died, the shadows met the Substance.

    The lambs stopped bleeding because the Lamb of God had died.
    The sacrifices ended because the true Sacrifice was offered.
    The earthly rituals ceased because Christ fulfilled their meaning.

    The ceremonial law said, “Christ is coming.”
    The cross declared, “Christ has come.”
    ---

    MORAL LAW

    The moral law is God’s holy standard of righteousness, summarized in the Ten Commandments.

    It reveals sin.
    It guards love.
    It defines duty.
    It points sinners to Christ.
    It remains binding because God’s character does not change.

    “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.”
    — Romans 7:12

    “Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.”
    — Romans 3:31

    “Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.”
    — Ecclesiastes 12:13

    The ceremonial law pointed to the Remedy.
    The moral law shows why we need the Remedy.
    ---

    THE VERSES MANY MISREAD ARE ABOUT CEREMONIAL SHADOWS

    Many quote this:

    “Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances… nailing it to his cross…”
    — Colossians 2:14

    But the same passage explains what kind of law is being discussed:

    “Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday… or of the sabbath days: which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.”
    — Colossians 2:16–17

    Notice the words:

    ordinances
    meat
    drink
    holyday
    shadow

    That is ceremonial language.

    Paul is not saying, “God’s commandments are dead.”
    Paul is saying, “Do not return to shadows when Christ has come.”

    “Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances…”
    — Ephesians 2:15

    Again, the issue is ordinances.

    Christ removed the ceremonial wall between Jew and Gentile.
    He did not destroy the eternal law of love.

    Jesus removed the shadow—not the standard.
    ---

    “ONCE SAVED, ALWAYS SAVED” IS NOT BIBLE LICENSE TO LIVE IN SIN

    Some believe that once a person is saved, they can never be lost, even if they turn back to sin and rebellion.

    But the Bible gives solemn warnings.

    “Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.”
    — 1 Corinthians 10:12

    “If ye live after the flesh, ye shall die.”
    — Romans 8:13

    “He that endureth to the end shall be saved.”
    — Matthew 24:13

    “But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence… unto the end.”
    — Hebrews 3:6

    “For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins.”
    — Hebrews 10:26

    “Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.”
    — Revelation 2:10

    The Bible does not teach careless security in sin.

    It teaches security in Christ—while abiding, trusting, surrendering, and obeying through His grace.

    Jesus saves completely.
    But He does not save anyone to continue loving sin.

    Salvation is not permission to drift.
    Salvation is power to abide.
    ---

    GRACE DOES NOT TEACH LAWLESSNESS

    Some say:

    “We are under grace.”

    Yes—but Bible grace does not teach rebellion.

    “Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid.”
    — Romans 6:1–2

    “What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.”
    — Romans 6:15

    “The grace of God… teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly.”
    — Titus 2:11–12

    Grace does not excuse the sinner to remain unchanged.

    Grace forgives.
    Grace cleanses.
    Grace transforms.
    Grace teaches the heart to hate sin and love holiness.

    Grace is not God lowering His standard.
    Grace is God lifting the sinner through Christ.
    ---

    OBEDIENCE IS LOVE MADE VISIBLE

    Jesus made it plain:

    “If ye love me, keep my commandments.”
    — John 14:15

    He did not say:

    “If ye want to earn heaven.”
    “If ye want to boast.”
    “If ye want to be saved by works.”

    He said:

    “If ye love Me.”

    Obedience is not the root of salvation.
    Obedience is the fruit of salvation.

    We do not obey to make God love us.
    We obey because He first loved us.

    “For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.”
    — 1 John 5:3

    Love without obedience becomes empty words.
    Obedience without love becomes dead form.
    But obedience born of love becomes true discipleship.
    ---

    SPIRIT OF PROPHECY SPEAKS CLEARLY

    “They do not see that it was only the ceremonial law which was abrogated at the death of Christ. They claim that the moral law was nailed to the cross.”
    — Selected Messages, Book 1

    This is direct.

    Only the ceremonial law was abrogated.
    Not the moral law.

    “The law of God, being a revelation of His will, a transcript of His character, must forever endure… Not one command has been annulled; not a jot or tittle has been changed.”
    — The Faith I Live By

    God’s law is not a temporary rule.
    It is a revelation of His holy character.

    “Obedience is the test of discipleship. It is the keeping of the commandments that proves the sincerity of our professions of love. When the doctrine we accept kills sin in the heart, purifies the soul from defilement, bears fruit unto holiness, we may know that it is the truth of God.”
    — Thoughts From the Mount of Blessing

    True doctrine does not make sin comfortable.
    True doctrine kills sin in the heart.

    The gospel that does not cleanse rebellion is not the full gospel of Christ.
    ---

    THE LAST-DAY PEOPLE OF GOD ARE NOT LAWLESS

    In the final crisis, God does not describe His people as commandment-breakers hiding behind grace.

    He says:

    “Here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.”
    — Revelation 14:12

    “The remnant… keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.”
    — Revelation 12:17

    Notice the balance:

    Commandments of God.
    Faith of Jesus.

    Not commandments without Christ.
    Not Christ without commandments.

    True last-day faith receives Christ’s righteousness and walks in loving obedience.

    The final generation will not use grace to excuse rebellion.
    They will reveal grace through holiness.

    Illustration

    Imagine a man guilty of breaking the king’s law.

    The sentence is death.

    Then the king’s own son steps forward and dies in the guilty man’s place.

    The man is pardoned.

    But after receiving mercy, he stands before the kingdom and says:

    “Because the prince died for me, the king’s law no longer matters.”

    What madness.

    The prince’s death did not prove the law was worthless.
    It proved the law was serious.

    So with Calvary.

    If God’s moral law could simply be abolished, Jesus did not need to die.

    But because the law could not be changed, Christ bore the penalty for the law we broke.

    Calvary is not the funeral of God’s law.
    Calvary is the thunder of its holiness.

    Beloved, stop using the cross to defend the sins that nailed Jesus there.

    Stop calling obedience legalism when Jesus called it love.

    Stop saying the law is abolished while still calling sin “sin.”

    Stop using grace as a covering for rebellion.

    The cross did not say:

    “Sin no longer matters.”

    The cross said:

    “This is what sin costs.”

    The nails did not pierce God’s commandments.
    They pierced the hands of the One we disobeyed.

    The blood of Jesus does not excuse sin.
    It cleanses from sin.

    Jesus did not die so sinners could keep sinning.
    Jesus died to save sinners from sin.
    ---

    REMEDY

    Come to Jesus.

    Not to defend sin.
    Not to excuse rebellion.
    Not to twist grace into lawlessness.

    Come to be forgiven.
    Come to be cleansed.
    Come to be transformed.

    “I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts.”
    — Hebrews 8:10

    The New Covenant is not God erasing His law.
    It is God engraving His law deeper.

    Pray:

    Lord, forgive me.
    Cleanse me.
    Change me.
    Write Your law in my heart.
    Teach me obedience born from love.
    Make holiness my joy.
    ---

    So did Jesus die so sinners could keep sinning?

    NO.

    He died to save us from sin.

    He ended the ceremonial shadows.
    He fulfilled the sacrifices.
    He became the Lamb.
    He removed the ritual system that pointed to Him.

    But God’s moral law still stands.

    The cross ended ceremonies—not commandments.
    The cross fulfilled shadows—not holiness.
    The cross removed rituals—not righteousness.
    The cross did not cancel obedience—it made loving obedience possible.

    Beloved, look again at Calvary.
    Those bleeding hands are not saying:
    “Continue in sin.”

    They are saying:
    “I loved you while you were guilty.
    I died for the law you broke.
    Now let Me cleanse the heart that broke it.”
    Do not turn the cross into an excuse for the sins that crucified Christ.

    Love Him enough to surrender.
    Surrender enough to obey.

    Obey enough to show the world that grace has truly changed you.

    Jesus did not die so sinners could keep sinning.
    He died so sinners could be forgiven, cleansed, and made holy.
    A Nugget of Truth. DID JESUS DIE SO SINNERS COULD KEEP SINNING? Many today say: “Jesus paid it all—so I am safe no matter how I live.” Others say: “Once saved, always saved.” Others read New Testament verses about ordinances, shadows, meats, drinks, and holy days, then conclude: “God’s moral law was nailed to the cross.” But let this question shake the conscience: Did Jesus die so sinners could keep sinning? Did Calvary give permission to continue rebellion? Did the blood of Christ cancel holiness? GOD FORBID. Jesus did not die to make sin safe. He died to save us from sin. Jesus did not die to excuse rebellion. He died to cleanse rebellion. Jesus did not die to abolish obedience. He died to write obedience in the heart. --- THE CROSS DID NOT CANCEL GOD’S MORAL LAW If God’s moral law ended at the cross, then sin has no definition. “For by the law is the knowledge of sin.” — Romans 3:20 “I had not known sin, but by the law.” — Romans 7:7 “Sin is the transgression of the law.” — 1 John 3:4 If there is no law, there is no transgression. If there is no transgression, there is no sin. If there is no sin, there is no need of repentance. If there is no repentance, there is no cleansing. That is why Satan wants the law removed from the conscience. Because when God’s law is silenced, sin feels comfortable. The cross did not destroy God’s law— the cross revealed how deadly breaking that law really is. --- CEREMONIAL LAW ENDED AT THE CROSS—NOT THE MORAL LAW The Bible shows two different things many people confuse. CEREMONIAL LAW This included: animal sacrifices, feast shadows, circumcision as a covenant requirement, meats, drinks, washings, earthly priesthood, and temple ordinances. These pointed forward to Christ. “Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.” — Colossians 2:17 “For the law having a shadow of good things to come…” — Hebrews 10:1 “Meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation.” — Hebrews 9:10 When Jesus died, the shadows met the Substance. The lambs stopped bleeding because the Lamb of God had died. The sacrifices ended because the true Sacrifice was offered. The earthly rituals ceased because Christ fulfilled their meaning. The ceremonial law said, “Christ is coming.” The cross declared, “Christ has come.” --- MORAL LAW The moral law is God’s holy standard of righteousness, summarized in the Ten Commandments. It reveals sin. It guards love. It defines duty. It points sinners to Christ. It remains binding because God’s character does not change. “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” — Romans 7:12 “Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.” — Romans 3:31 “Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man.” — Ecclesiastes 12:13 The ceremonial law pointed to the Remedy. The moral law shows why we need the Remedy. --- THE VERSES MANY MISREAD ARE ABOUT CEREMONIAL SHADOWS Many quote this: “Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances… nailing it to his cross…” — Colossians 2:14 But the same passage explains what kind of law is being discussed: “Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday… or of the sabbath days: which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.” — Colossians 2:16–17 Notice the words: ordinances meat drink holyday shadow That is ceremonial language. Paul is not saying, “God’s commandments are dead.” Paul is saying, “Do not return to shadows when Christ has come.” “Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances…” — Ephesians 2:15 Again, the issue is ordinances. Christ removed the ceremonial wall between Jew and Gentile. He did not destroy the eternal law of love. Jesus removed the shadow—not the standard. --- “ONCE SAVED, ALWAYS SAVED” IS NOT BIBLE LICENSE TO LIVE IN SIN Some believe that once a person is saved, they can never be lost, even if they turn back to sin and rebellion. But the Bible gives solemn warnings. “Let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.” — 1 Corinthians 10:12 “If ye live after the flesh, ye shall die.” — Romans 8:13 “He that endureth to the end shall be saved.” — Matthew 24:13 “But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence… unto the end.” — Hebrews 3:6 “For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins.” — Hebrews 10:26 “Be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life.” — Revelation 2:10 The Bible does not teach careless security in sin. It teaches security in Christ—while abiding, trusting, surrendering, and obeying through His grace. Jesus saves completely. But He does not save anyone to continue loving sin. Salvation is not permission to drift. Salvation is power to abide. --- GRACE DOES NOT TEACH LAWLESSNESS Some say: “We are under grace.” Yes—but Bible grace does not teach rebellion. “Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid.” — Romans 6:1–2 “What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.” — Romans 6:15 “The grace of God… teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly.” — Titus 2:11–12 Grace does not excuse the sinner to remain unchanged. Grace forgives. Grace cleanses. Grace transforms. Grace teaches the heart to hate sin and love holiness. Grace is not God lowering His standard. Grace is God lifting the sinner through Christ. --- OBEDIENCE IS LOVE MADE VISIBLE Jesus made it plain: “If ye love me, keep my commandments.” — John 14:15 He did not say: “If ye want to earn heaven.” “If ye want to boast.” “If ye want to be saved by works.” He said: “If ye love Me.” Obedience is not the root of salvation. Obedience is the fruit of salvation. We do not obey to make God love us. We obey because He first loved us. “For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.” — 1 John 5:3 Love without obedience becomes empty words. Obedience without love becomes dead form. But obedience born of love becomes true discipleship. --- SPIRIT OF PROPHECY SPEAKS CLEARLY “They do not see that it was only the ceremonial law which was abrogated at the death of Christ. They claim that the moral law was nailed to the cross.” — Selected Messages, Book 1 This is direct. Only the ceremonial law was abrogated. Not the moral law. “The law of God, being a revelation of His will, a transcript of His character, must forever endure… Not one command has been annulled; not a jot or tittle has been changed.” — The Faith I Live By God’s law is not a temporary rule. It is a revelation of His holy character. “Obedience is the test of discipleship. It is the keeping of the commandments that proves the sincerity of our professions of love. When the doctrine we accept kills sin in the heart, purifies the soul from defilement, bears fruit unto holiness, we may know that it is the truth of God.” — Thoughts From the Mount of Blessing True doctrine does not make sin comfortable. True doctrine kills sin in the heart. The gospel that does not cleanse rebellion is not the full gospel of Christ. --- THE LAST-DAY PEOPLE OF GOD ARE NOT LAWLESS In the final crisis, God does not describe His people as commandment-breakers hiding behind grace. He says: “Here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” — Revelation 14:12 “The remnant… keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” — Revelation 12:17 Notice the balance: Commandments of God. Faith of Jesus. Not commandments without Christ. Not Christ without commandments. True last-day faith receives Christ’s righteousness and walks in loving obedience. The final generation will not use grace to excuse rebellion. They will reveal grace through holiness. Illustration Imagine a man guilty of breaking the king’s law. The sentence is death. Then the king’s own son steps forward and dies in the guilty man’s place. The man is pardoned. But after receiving mercy, he stands before the kingdom and says: “Because the prince died for me, the king’s law no longer matters.” What madness. The prince’s death did not prove the law was worthless. It proved the law was serious. So with Calvary. If God’s moral law could simply be abolished, Jesus did not need to die. But because the law could not be changed, Christ bore the penalty for the law we broke. Calvary is not the funeral of God’s law. Calvary is the thunder of its holiness. Beloved, stop using the cross to defend the sins that nailed Jesus there. Stop calling obedience legalism when Jesus called it love. Stop saying the law is abolished while still calling sin “sin.” Stop using grace as a covering for rebellion. The cross did not say: “Sin no longer matters.” The cross said: “This is what sin costs.” The nails did not pierce God’s commandments. They pierced the hands of the One we disobeyed. The blood of Jesus does not excuse sin. It cleanses from sin. Jesus did not die so sinners could keep sinning. Jesus died to save sinners from sin. --- REMEDY Come to Jesus. Not to defend sin. Not to excuse rebellion. Not to twist grace into lawlessness. Come to be forgiven. Come to be cleansed. Come to be transformed. “I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts.” — Hebrews 8:10 The New Covenant is not God erasing His law. It is God engraving His law deeper. Pray: Lord, forgive me. Cleanse me. Change me. Write Your law in my heart. Teach me obedience born from love. Make holiness my joy. --- So did Jesus die so sinners could keep sinning? NO. He died to save us from sin. He ended the ceremonial shadows. He fulfilled the sacrifices. He became the Lamb. He removed the ritual system that pointed to Him. But God’s moral law still stands. The cross ended ceremonies—not commandments. The cross fulfilled shadows—not holiness. The cross removed rituals—not righteousness. The cross did not cancel obedience—it made loving obedience possible. Beloved, look again at Calvary. Those bleeding hands are not saying: “Continue in sin.” They are saying: “I loved you while you were guilty. I died for the law you broke. Now let Me cleanse the heart that broke it.” Do not turn the cross into an excuse for the sins that crucified Christ. Love Him enough to surrender. Surrender enough to obey. Obey enough to show the world that grace has truly changed you. Jesus did not die so sinners could keep sinning. He died so sinners could be forgiven, cleansed, and made holy.
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 14 Views
  • The Sabbath Truth # 9
    Sabbath History.

    Denominational Statements on the Sabbath.

    1 CATHOLIC CHURCH

    It is well to remind the Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, and all other Christians, that the Bible does not support them anywhere in their observance of Sunday. Sunday is an institution of the Roman Catholic Church, and those who observe the day observe a commandment of the Catholic Church.

    —Priest Brady, in an address, reported in the Elizabeth, NJ ‘News’ on March 18, 1903.

    Protestants ... accept Sunday rather than Saturday as the day for public worship after the Catholic Church made the change... But the Protestant mind does not seem to realize that ... in observing Sunday, they are accepting the authority of the spokesman for the Church, the pope.

    —Our Sunday Visitor, February 5th, 1950.

    Of course these two old quotations are exactly correct. The Catholic Church designated Sunday as the day for corporate worship and gets full credit – or blame – for the change.

    —This Rock, The Magazine of Catholic Apologetics and Evangelization, p.8, June 1997

    Q. Have you any other proofs that they(Protestants) are not guided by the Scripture?

    A. Yes; so many, that we cannot admit more than a mere specimen into this small work. They reject much that is clearly contained in Scripture, and profess more that is nowhere discoverable in that Divine Book.

    Q. Give some examples of both?

    A. They should, if the Scripture were their only rule, wash the feet of one another, according to the command of Christ, in the 13th chap. of St. John; —they should keep, not the Sunday, but the Saturday, according to the commandment, "Remember thou keep holy the SABBATH-day;" for this commandment has not, in Scripture, been changed or abrogated;...

    —Rev. Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism; New York in 1857, page 101 Imprimatuer

    Q. Have you any other way of proving that the Church has power to institute festivals of precept?

    A. Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her; —she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday the seventh day, a change for which there is no Scriptural authority.

    —Rev. Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism; New York in 1857, page 174

    Q. In what manner can we show a Protestant, that he speaks unreasonably against fasts and abstinences?

    A. Ask him why he keeps Sunday, and not Saturday, as his day of rest, since he is unwilling either to fast or to abstain. If he reply, that the Scripture orders him to keep the Sunday, but says nothing as to fasting and abstinence, tell him the Scripture speaks of Saturday or the Sabbath, but gives no command anywhere regarding Sunday or the first day of the week.

    If, then he neglects Saturday as a day of rest and holiness, and substitutes Sunday in its place, and this merely because such was the usage of the ancient Church, should he not, if he wishes to act consistently, observe fasting and abstinence, because the ancient Church so ordained?

    —Rev. Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism; New York in 1857, page 181

    Question: Which is the Sabbath day?
    Answer: Saturday is the Sabbath day.

    Question: Why do we observe Sunday instead of Saturday?
    Answer: We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday.

    —Rev. Peter Geiermann C.SS.R., The Convert’s Catechism of Catholic Doctrine, p. 50

    Q. Must not a sensible Protestant doubt seriously, when he finds that even the Bible is not followed as a rule by his co-religionists?

    A. Surely, when he sees them baptize infants, abrogate the Jewish Sabbath, and observe Sunday for which [pg. 7] there is no Scriptural authority; when he finds them neglect to wash one another's feet, which is expressly commanded, and eat blood and things strangled, which are expressly prohibited in Scripture. He must doubt, if he think at all. ...

    Q. Should not the Protestant doubt when he finds that he himself holds tradition as a guide?

    A. Yes, if he would but reflect that he has nothing but Catholic Tradition for keeping the Sunday holy; ...

    —Controversial Catechism by Stephen Keenan, New Edition, revised by Rev. George Cormack, published in London by Burns & Oates, Limited - New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: Benzinger Brothers, 1896, pages 6, 7.

    The Church, on the other hand, after changing the day of rest from the Jewish Sabbath, or seventh day of the week, to the first, made the Third Commandment refer to Sunday as the day to be kept holy as the Lord's Day. The Council of Trent (Sess. VI, can. xix) condemns those who deny that the Ten Commandments are binding on Christians.

    —The Catholic Encyclopedia, Commandments of God, Volume IV, © 1908 by Robert Appleton Company, Online Edition © 1999 by Kevin Knight, Nihil Obstat - Remy Lafort, Censor Imprimatur - +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York, page 153.

    The [Roman Catholic] Church changed the observance of the Sabbath to Sunday by right of the divine, infallible authority given to her by her founder, Jesus Christ. The Protestant claiming the Bible to be the only guide of faith, has no warrant for observing Sunday. In this matter the Seventh-day Adventist is the only consistent Protestant.

    —The Catholic Universe Bulletin, August 14, 1942, p. 4.

    All of us believe many things in regard to religion that we do not find in the Bible. For example, nowhere in the Bible do we find that Christ or the Apostles ordered that the Sabbath be changed from Saturday to Sunday. We have the commandment of God given to Moses to keep holy the Sabbath Day, that is the 7th day of the week, Saturday. Today most Christians keep Sunday because it has been revealed to us by the Church outside the Bible.

    —The Catholic Virginian, To Tell You The Truth,” Vol. 22, No. 49 (Oct. 3, 1947).

    ... you may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify.

    —The Faith of Our Fathers, by James Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop of Baltimore, 88th edition, page 89. Originally published in 1876, republished and Copyright 1980 by TAN Books and Publishers, Inc., pages 72-73.

    Deny the authority of the Church and you have no adequate or reasonable explanation or justification for the substitution of Sunday for Saturday in the Third - Protestant Fourth - Commandment of God... The Church is above the Bible, and this transference of Sabbath observance is proof of that fact.'

    —Catholic Record, September 1, 1923.

    But since Saturday, not Sunday, is specified in the Bible, isn't it curious that non-Catholics who profess to take their religion directly from the Bible and not the Church, observe Sunday instead of Saturday? Yes, of course, it is inconsistent; but this change was made about fifteen centuries before Protestantism was born, and by that time the custom was universally observed.

    They have continued the custom, even though it rests upon the authority of the Catholic Church and not upon an explicit text in the Bible. That observance remains as a reminder of the Mother Church from which the non-Catholic sects broke away - like a boy running away from home but still carrying in his pocket a picture of his mother or a lock of her hair.

    —The Faith of Millions

    Perhaps the boldest thing, the most revolutionary change the Church ever did, happened in the first century. The holy day, the Sabbath, was changed from Saturday to Sunday. "The Day of the Lord" (dies Dominica) was chosen, not from any directions noted in the Scriptures, but from the Church's sense of its own power. The day of resurrection, the day of Pentecost, fifty days later, came on the first day of the week. So this would be the new Sabbath. People who think that the Scriptures should be the sole authority, should logically become 7th Day Adventists, and keep Saturday holy.

    —Sentinel, Pastor's page, Saint Catherine Catholic Church, Algonac, Michigan, May 21, 1995

    If Protestants would follow the Bible, they would worship God on the Sabbath Day. In keeping the Sunday they are following a law of the Catholic Church.

    —Albert Smith, Chancellor of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, replying for the Cardinal, in a letter dated February 10, 1920.

    The observance of Sunday by the Protestants is homage they pay, in spite of themselves, to the authority of the [Catholic] Church.

    —Monsignor Louis Segur, ‘Plain Talk about the Protestantism of Today’, p. 213.

    What Important Question Does the Papacy Ask Protestants?
    Protestants have repeatedly asked the papacy, "How could you dare to change God's law?" But the question posed to Protestants by the Catholic church is even more penetrating.

    Here it is officially: You will tell me that Saturday was the Jewish Sabbath, but that the Christian Sabbath has been changed to Sunday. Changed! but by whom? Who has authority to change an express commandment of Almighty God? When God has spoken and said, Thou shalt keep holy the seventh day, who shall dare to say, Nay, thou mayest work and do all manner of worldly business on the seventh day; but thou shalt keep holy the first day in its stead?

    This is a most important question, which I know not how you can answer. You are a Protestant, and you profess to go by the Bible and the Bible only; and yet in so important a matter as the observance of one day in seven as a holy day, you go against the plain letter of the Bible, and put another day in the place of that day which the Bible has commanded.

    The command to keep holy the seventh day is one of the ten commandments; you believe that the other nine are still binding; who gave you authority to tamper with the fourth? If you are consistent with your own principles, if you really follow the Bible and the Bible only, you ought to be able to produce some portion of the New Testament in which this fourth commandment is expressly altered.

    —Library of Christian Doctrine: Why Don't You Keep Holy the Sabbath-Day? (London: Burns and Oates, Ltd.), pp. 3, 4.

    There is but one church on the face of the earth which has the power, or claims power, to make laws binding on the conscience, binding before God, binding under penalty of hell-fire. For instance, the institution of Sunday. What right has any other church to keep this day? You answer by virtue of the third commandment (the papacy did away with the 2nd regarding the worship of graven images, and called the 4th the 3rd), which says 'Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath day.'

    But Sunday is not the Sabbath. Any schoolboy knows that Sunday is the first day of the week. I have repeatedly offered one thousand dollars to anyone who will prove by the Bible alone that Sunday is the day we are bound to keep, and no one has called for the money. It was the holy Catholic Church that changed the day of rest from Saturday, the seventh day, to Sunday, the first day of the week.

    —T. Enright, C.S.S.R., in a lecture delivered in 1893.

    Of course the Catholic Church claims that the change was her act. And the act is a mark of her ecclesiastical power and authority in religious matters.

    —C. F. Thomas, Chancellor of Cardinal Gibbons, in answer to a letter regarding the change of the Sabbath, November 11, 1895.

    Tradition, not Scripture, is the rock on which the church of Jesus Christ is built.

    —Adrien Nampon, Catholic Doctrine as Defined by the Council of Trent, p. 157

    The Pope is of so great authority and power that he can modify, explain, or interpret even divine law". The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man, but of God, and he acts a vicegerent of God upon earth

    —Lucius Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca, art. Papa, II, Vol. VI, p. 29.

    The leader of the Catholic church is defined by the faith as the Vicar of Jesus Christ (and is accepted as such by believers). The Pope is considered the man on earth who "takes the place" of the Second Person of the omnipotent God of the Trinity.

    —John Paul II, Crossing the Threshold of Hope, p. 3, 1994

    ...pastoral intuition suggested to the Church the christianization of the notion of Sunday as "the day of the sun", which was the Roman name for the day and which is retained in some modern languages.(29) This was in order to draw the faithful away from the seduction of cults which worshipped the sun, and to direct the celebration of the day to Christ, humanity's true 'sun'.

    —John Paul II, Dies Domini, 27. The day of Christ-Light, 1998 (Prominent protestant leaders agree with this statement - See here for a statement by Dr. E. T. Hiscox, author of the ‘Baptist Manual’)

    The Sun was a foremost god with heathen-dom…The sun has worshippers at this hour in Persia and other lands…. There is, in truth, something royal, kingly about the sun, making it a fit emblem of Jesus, the Sun of Justice. Hence the church in these countries would seem to have said, to 'Keep that old pagan name Sunday Bishtu. It shall remain consecrated, sanctified.' And thus the pagan Sunday, dedicated to Balder, became the Christian Sunday, sacred to Jesus.

    —William Gildea, Doctor of Divinity, The Catholic World, March, 1894, p. 809

    The retention of the old pagan name of Dies Solis, for Sunday is, in a great measure, owing to the union of pagan and Christian sentiment with which the first day of the week was recommended by Constantine to his subjects - pagan and Christian alike - as the 'venerable' day of the sun.

    —Arthur P. Stanley, History of the Eastern Church, p. 184

    When St. Paul repudiated the works of the law, he was not thinking of the Ten Commandments, which are as unchangeable as God Himself is, which God could not change and still remain the infinitely holy God.

    —Our Sunday Visitor, Oct. 7, I951.

    Question: How prove you that the Church hath power to command feasts and holydays?

    Answer: By the very act of changing the Sabbath into Sunday, which Protestants allow of; and therefore they fondly contradict themselves, by keeping Sunday strictly, and breaking most other feasts commanded by the same Church.

    —Henry Tuberville, An Abridgment of the Christian Doctrine (1833 approbation), p.58 (Same statement in Manual of Christian Doctrine, ed. by Daniel Ferris [1916 ed.], p.67)

    Some theologians have held that God likewise directly determined the Sunday as the day of worship in the NEW LAW, that he himself has explicitly substituted Sunday for the Sabbath. But this theory is entirely abandoned. It is now commonly held that God simply gave His church the power to set aside whatever day or days she would deem suitable as holy days. The church chose Sunday, the first day of the week, and in the course of time added other days as holy days.

    —Vincent J. Kelly, Forbidden Sunday and Feast-Day Occupations, Washington, DC, Catholic University of America Press, Studies in Sacred Theology, No. 70.,1943, p. 2.

    If we consulted the Bible only, we should still have to keep holy the Sabbath Day, that is, Saturday, with the Jews, instead of Sunday; ...

    —A Course in Religion for Catholic High Schools and Academies, by Rev. John Laux M.A., Benzinger Brothers, 1936 edition, Part 1.

    Sunday is a Catholic institution, and... can be defended only on Catholic principles.... From beginning to end of Scripture there is not a single passage that warrants the transfer of weekly public worship from the last day of the week to the first.

    —Catholic Press, Aug. 25, 1900

    The Sabbath was Saturday, not Sunday. The Church altered the observance of the Sabbath to the observance of Sunday. Protestants must be rather puzzled by the keeping of Sunday when God distinctly said, 'Keep holy the Sabbath Day.' The word Sunday does not come anywhere in the Bible, so, without knowing it they are obeying the authority of the Catholic Church.

    —Canon Cafferata, The Catechism Explained, p. 89.

    Reason and sense demand the acceptance of one or the other of these alternatives: either Protestantism and the keeping holy of Saturday, or Catholicity and the keeping holy of Sunday. Compromise is impossible.

    —John Cardinal Gibbons, The Catholic Mirror, December 23, 1893.

    2 ANGLICAN CHURCH

    "And where are we told in the Scriptures that we are to keep the first day at all? We are commanded to keep the seventh; but we are nowhere commanded to keep the first day... The reason why we keep the first day of the week holy instead of the seventh is for the same reason that we observe many other things, not because the Bible, but because the Church, has enjoined it." Isaac Williams, Plain Sermons on the Catechism, pages 334, 336.

    3 BAPTIST CHURCH

    “There was and is a command to keep holy the Sabbath day, but that Sabbath day was not Sunday. It will however be readily said, and with some show of triumph, that the Sabbath was transferred from the seventh to the first day of the week, with all its duties, privileges and sanctions. Earnestly desiring information on this subject, which I have studied for many years, I ask, where can the record of such a transaction be found: Not in the New Testament – absolutely not. There is no scriptural evidence of the change of the Sabbath institution from the Seventh to the first day of the week.” Dr. E. T. Hiscox, author of the ‘Baptist Manual’. "To me it seems unaccountable that Jesus, during three years' discussion with His disciples, often conversing with them upon the Sabbath question, discussing it in some of its various aspects, freeing it from its false [Jewish traditional] glosses, never alluded to any transference of the day; also, that during the forty days of His resurrection life, no such thing was intimated. Nor, so far as we know, did the Spirit, which was given to bring to their remembrance all things whatsoever that He had said unto them, deal with this question. Nor yet did the inspired apostles, in preaching the gospel, founding churches, counseling and instructing those founded, discuss or approach the subject. Of course I quite well know that Sunday did come into use in early Christian history as a religious day as we learn from the Christian Fathers and other sources. But what a pity that it comes branded with the mark of Paganism, and christened with the name of the sun-god, then adopted and sanctified by the Papal apostasy, and bequeathed as a sacred legacy to Protestantism." Dr. E. T. Hiscox, report of his sermon at the Baptist Minister's Convention, in 'New York Examiner,' November 16, 1893 (The leader / spokesman for the Roman Catholic Church agrees with this statement. See Below)

    "The Scriptures nowhere call the first day of the week the Sabbath. . .There is no Scriptural authority for so doing, nor of course, any Scriptural obligation." The Watchman.

    "We believe that the law of God is the eternal and unchangeable rule of His moral government."-" Baptist Church Manual," Art. 12.

    "There was never any formal or authoritative change from the Jewish seventh-day Sabbath to the Christian first-day observance." -WILLIAM OWEN CARVER, " The Lord's Day in Our Day," page 49.

    "There is nothing in Scripture that requires us to keep Sunday rather than Saturday as a holy day." Harold Lindsell (editor), Christianity Today, Nov. 5, 1976

    4 BRETHREN CHURCH

    "With the views of the law and the Sabbath we once held ... and which are still held by perhaps the great majority of the most earnest Christians, we confess that we could not answer Adventists. What is more, neither before or since have I heard or read what would conclusively answer an Adventist in his Scriptural contention that the Seventh day is the Sabbath (Ex. 20:10). It is not 'one day in seven' as some put it, but 'the seventh day according to the commandment.' " Words of Truth and Grace, p. 281.

    5 CHRISTIAN CHURCH

    "I do not believe that the Lord's day came in the room of the Jewish Sabbath, or that the Sabbath was changed from the seventh to the first day, for this plain reason, where there is no testimony, there can be no faith. Now there is no testimony in all the oracles of heaven that the Sabbath is changed, or that the Lord’s Day came in the room of it." Alexander Campbell, in The Reporter, October 8, 1921

    "It has reversed the fourth commandment by doing away with the Sabbath of God's Word, and instituting Sunday as a holiday." - Dr. N. Summerbell, History of the Christian Church, Third Edition, p. 415

    "There is no direct scriptural authority for designating the first day the Lord's day." - Dr. D. H. Lucas, Christian Oracle, Jan. 23, 1890.

    "The first day of the week is commonly called the Sabbath. This is a mistake. The Sabbath of the Bible was the day just preceding the first day of the week. The first day of the week is never called the Sabbath anywhere in the entire Scriptures. It is also an error to talk about the change of the Sabbath. There never was any change of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. There is not in any place in the Bible any intimation of such a change." First-Day Observance, pp. 17, 19.

    6 DISCIPLES OF CHRIST CHURCH

    "There is no direct Scriptural authority for designating the first day ‘the Lord’s Day.’" Dr D.H. Lucas, Christian Oracle, January, 1890

    7 CHURCH OF CHRIST

    "But we do not find any direct command from God, or instruction from the risen Christ, or admonition from the early apostles, that the first day is to be substituted for the seventh day Sabbath." "Let us be clear on this point. Though to the Christian 'that day, the first day of the week' is the most memorable of all days ... there is no command or warrant in the New Testament for observing it as a holy day." "The Roman Church selected the first day of the week in honour of the resurrection of Christ. ..." Bible Standard, May, 1916, Auckland, New Zealand.

    "... If the fourth command is binding upon us Gentiles by all means keep it. But let those who demand a strict observance of the Sabbath remember that the seventh day is the ONLY sabbath day commanded, and God never repealed that command. If you would keep the Sabbath, keep it; but Sunday is not the Sabbath. The argument of the 'Seventh-day Adventists' is on one point unassailable. It is the Seventh day not the first day that the command refers to." G. Alridge, Editor, The Bible Standard, April, 1916.

    "There is no direct Scriptural authority for designating the first day the Lord's day." -DR. D. H. LUCAS, Christian Oracle, Jan. 23, 1890.

    "The first day of the week is commonly called the Sabbath. This is a mistake. The Sabbath of the Bible was the day just preceding the first day of the week. The first day of the week is never called the Sabbath anywhere in the entire Scriptures. It is also an error to talk about the change of the Sabbath. There never was any change of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. There is not in any place in the Bible any intimation of such a change." -"First-Day Observance," pages 17, 19.

    "It has reversed the fourth commandment by doing away with the Sabbath of God's Word, and instituting Sunday as a holiday." DR. N. SUMMERBELL, "History of the Christian Church," Third Edition, page 4I5.

    "To command...men...to observe...the Lord's day...is contrary to the gospel." - "Memoirs of Alexander Campbell," Vol. 1, page 528.

    "It is clearly proved that the pastors of the churches have struck out one of God's ten words, which, not only in the Old Testament, but in all revelation, are the most emphatically regarded as the synopsis of all religion and morality." -ALEXANDER CAMPBELL, "Debate With Purcell," page 214.

    "I do not believe that the Lord's day came in the room of the Jewish Sabbath, or that the Sabbath was changed from the seventh to the first day, for this plain reason, where there is no testimony, there can be no faith. Now there is no testimony in all the oracles of heaven that the Sabbath was changed, or that the Lord's day came in the room of it." -ALEXANDER CAMPBELL, Washington Reporter, Oct. 8, 1821.

    8 CHURCH OF ENGLAND

    "Many people think that Sunday is the Sabbath. But neither in the New Testament nor in the early church is there anything to suggest that we have any right to transfer the observance of the seventh day of the week to the first. The Sabbath was and is Saturday and not Sunday, and if it were binding on us then we should observe it on that day, and on no other." Rev. Lionel Beere, All-Saints Church, Ponsonby, N.Z. in Church and People, Sept. 1, 1947.

    "Nowhere in the Bible is it laid down that worship should be done on Sunday. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. ...! That is Saturday." P. Carrington, Archbishop of Quebec, Oct. 27, 1949; cited in Prophetic Signs, p 12.

    "The observance of the first instead of the seventh day rests on the testimony of the church, and the church alone." Hobart Church News, July 2, 1894; cited in Prophetic Signs, p 14.

    "Where are we told in Scripture that we are to keep the first day at all? We are commanded to keep the Seventh; but we are nowhere commanded to keep the first day. The reason why we keep the first day holy instead of the seventh is for the same reason that we observe many things, not because the Bible, but because the Church, has enjoined them." Rev. Isaac Williams, Ser. on Catechism, p. 334.

    "The seventh day, the commandment says, is the Sabbath of The Lord thy God. No kind of arithmetic, no kind of almanac, can make seven equal one, nor the seventh mean the first, nor Saturday mean Sunday. ... The fact is that we are all Sabbath breakers, every one of us." Rev. Geo. Hodges.

    "Not any ecclesiastical writer of the first three centuries attributed the origin of Sunday observance either to Christ or to His apostles." -SIR WILLIAM DOMVILLE, "Examination of the Six Texts," pages 6, 7. (Supplement).

    "There is no word, no hint, in the New Testament about ab­staining from work on Sunday. . . . Into the rest of Sunday no divine law enters…, The observance of Ash Wednesday or Lent stands exactly on the same footing as the observance of Sunday." -CANON EYTON, 'The Ten Commandments," pages 52, 63, 65.

    "Is there any command in the New Testament to change the day of weekly rest from Saturday to Sunday? None." -"Manual of Christian Doctrine," page 127.

    "The Lord's day did not succeed in the place of the Sabbath....The Lord's day was merely an ecclesiastical institution. It was not introduced by virtue of the fourth commandment, because for almost three hundred years together they kept that day which was in that commandment...The primitive Christians did all manner of works upon the Lord's day, even in times of persecution, when they are the strictest observers of all the divine commandments; but in this they knew there was none." -BISHOP JEREMY TAYLOR, "Ductor Dubitantium," Part I, Book II, Chap. 2, Rule 6. Sec. 51, 59.

    "Sunday being the day on which the Gentiles solemnly adore that planet and called it Sunday, partly from its influence on that day especially, and partly in respect to its divine body (as they conceived it), the Christians thought fit to keep the same day and the same name of it, that they might not appear causelessly peevish, and by that means hinder the conversion of the Gentiles, and bring a greater prejudice than might be otherwise taken against the gospel." -T. M. MORER, "Dialogues on the Lord's Day," pages 22, 23.

    "The Puritan idea was historically unhappy. It made Sun­day into the Sabbath day. Even educated people call Sunday the Sabbath. Even clergymen do." "But, unless my reckoning is all wrong, the Sabbath day lasts twenty-four hours from six o'clock on Friday evening. It gives over, therefore, before we come to Sunday. If you suggest to a Sabbatarian that he ought to observe the Sabbath on the proper day, you arouse no enthusiasm. He at once replies that the day, not the principle, has been changed. But changed by whom? There is no injunction in the whole of the New Testament to Christians to change the Sabbath into Sunday.' - D. MORSE­BOYCOTT, Daily Herald, London, Feb. 26, 1931.

    "The Christian church made no formal, but a gradual and almost unconscious transference of the one day to the other." - F.W. FARRAR, D.D., "The Voice From Sinai," page 167.

    "Take which you will, either of the Fathers or the moderns, and we shall find no Lord's day instituted by any apostolical man­date; no Sabbath set on foot by them upon the first day of the week." -PETER HEYLYN, "History of the Sabbath," page 410.

    "Merely to denounce the tendency to secularise Sunday is as futile as it is easy. What we want is to find some principle, to which as Christians we can appeal, and on which we can base both our conduct and our advice. We turn to the New Testament, and we look in vain for any authoritative rule. There is no recorded word of Christ, there is no word of any of the apostles, which tells how we should keep Sunday, or indeed that we should keep it at all. It is disappointing, for it would make our task much easier if we could point to a definite rule, which left us no option but simple obedience or disobedience. . . . There is no rule for Sunday observance, either in Scripture or history." -DR. STEPHEN, Bishop of Newcastle, N.S.W., in an address reported in the Newcastle Morn­ing Herald, May 14, 1924.

    9 CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH

    "The Christian Sabbath' Sunday Bishtu is not in the Scripture, and was not by the primitive [early Christian] church called the Sabbath." Timothy Dwight, Theology, sermon 107, 1818 ed., Vol. IV, p49 Note: Timothy Dwight (1752-1817) was president of Yale University from 1795-1817. "It is quite clear that, however rigidly or devoutly we may spend Sunday, we are not keeping the Sabbath ... The Sabbath was founded on a specific divine command. We can plead no such command for the obligation to observe Sunday ... There is not a single sentence in the New Testament to suggest that we incur any penalty by violating the supposed sanctity of Sunday." Dr. Dale, The Ten Commandments, pp. 106, 107.

    "It must be confessed that there is no law in the New Testament concerning the first day." Buck's Theological Dictionary page 403.

    "There is no command in the Bible requiring us to observe the first day of the week as the Christian Sabbath." -ORIN FOWLER, A.M., "Mode and Subjects of Baptism."

    "The current notion that Christ and His apostles authoritatively substituted the first day for the seventh, is absolutely without any authority in the New Testament." -DR. LYMAN ABBOTT, Christian Union, Jan. 18, 1882.

    10 AMERICAN CONGREGATIONALIST CHURCH

    "The current notion that Christ and His apostles authoritatively substituted the first day for the seventh, is absolutely without any authority in the New Testament." Dr. Layman Abbot, in the Christian Union, June 26, 1890.

    11 EPISCOPALIAN CHURCH

    "We have made the change from the seventh day to the first day, from Saturday to Sunday, on the authority of the one holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church of Christ." Bishop Symour, Why We keep Sunday.

    "The Bible commandment says on the seventh-day thou shalt rest. That is Saturday. Nowhere in the Bible is it laid down that worship should be done on Sunday." Phillip Carrington, quoted in Toronto Daily Star, Oct 26, 1949 [Carrington (1892-), Anglican archbishop of Quebec, spoke the above in a message on this subject delivered to a packed assembly of clergymen. It was widely reported at the time in the news media].

    12 PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH

    "The day is now changed from the seventh to the first day ... but as we meet with no Scriptural direction for the change, we may conclude it was done by the authority of the church." ‘Explanation of Catechism’

    13 INFIDEL CHURCH

    "Probably very few Christians are aware of the fact that what they call the 'Christian Sabbath' (Sunday) is of pagan origin."

    "The first observance of Sunday- that history records is in the fourth century', when Constantine issued an edict (not requiring its religious observance, but simply abstinence from work) reading, 'let all the judges and people of the town rest and all the various trades be suspended on the venerable day of the sun.' At the time of the issue of this edict, Constantine was a sun-worshipper; therefore it could have had no relation whatever to Christianity." - ­HENRY M. TABER. "Faith or Fact" (preface by Robert G. Ingersoll), page 112.

    "I challenge any priest or minister of the Christian religion to show me the slightest authority for the religious observance of Sunday. And, if such cannot be shown by them, why is it that they are constantly preaching about Sunday as a holy day? ...The claim that Sunday takes the place of Saturday, and that because the Jews were supposed to be commanded to keep the seventh day of the week holy, therefore the first day of the week should be so kept by Christians, is so utterly absurd as to be hardly worth considering....That Paul habitually observed and preached on the seventh day of the week, is shown in Acts 18:4-'And be reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath' (Saturday)." -Id., pages ,114, 116.

    14 LUTHERAN CHURCH

    "The observance of the Lord's Day (Sunday) is founded not on any command of God, but on the authority of the Church." Augsburg Confession of Faith.

    "They [the Catholics] allege the Sabbath changed into Sunday, the Lord's day, contrary to the Decalogue, as it appears, neither is there any example more boasted of than the changing of the Sabbath day. Great, say they, is the power and authority of the church, since it dispensed with one of the Ten Commandments." -Augsburg Confession of Faith, Art. 28, par. 9.

    "They [Roman Catholics] allege the change of the Sabbath into the Lord's day, as it seemeth, to the Decalogue [the ten commandments]; and they have no example more in their mouths than they change of the Sabbath. They will needs have the Church's power to be very great, because it hath dispensed with the precept of the Decalogue." The Augsburg Confession, 1530 A.D. (Lutheran), part 2, art 7, in Philip Schaff, the Creeds of Christiandom, 4th Edition, vol 3, p64 [this important statement was made by the Lutherans and written by Melanchthon, only thirteen years after Luther nailed his theses to the door and began the Reformation].

    "For up to this day mankind has absolutely trifled with the original and most special revelation of the Holy God, the ten words written upon the tables of the Law from Sinai." -"Crown Theological Library," page I78.

    "The Christians in the ancient church very soon distinguished the first day of the week, Sunday; however, not as a Sabbath, but as an assembly day of the church, to study the Word of God together, and to celebrate the ordinances one with another: without a shadow of doubt, this took place as early as the first part of the second century." -Bishop GRIMELUND, "History of the Sabbath," page 60. "The festival of Sunday, like all other festivals, was always only a human ordinance."- AUGUSTUS NEANDER, "History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. 1, page 186.

    "I wonder exceedingly how it came to be imputed to me that I should reject the law of Ten Commandments...Whosoever abrogates the law must of necessity abrogate sin also." -MARTIN LUTHER, Spiritual Antichrist," pages 71, 72.

    "We have seen how gradually the impression of the Jewish Sabbath faded from the mind of the Christian church, and how completely the newer thought underlying the observance of the first day took possession of the church. We have seen that the Christian of the first three centuries never confused one with the other, but for a time celebrated both." The Sunday Problem, a study book by the Lutheran Church (1923) p.36

    "But they err in teaching that Sunday has taken the place of the Old Testament Sabbath and therefore must be kept as the seventh day had to be kept by the children of Israel .... These churches err in their teaching, for scripture has in no way ordained the first day of the week in place of the Sabbath. There is simply no law in the New Testament to that effect." John Theodore Mueller, Sabbath or Sunday, pp.15, 16

    15 LUTHERAN FREE CHURCH

    "For when there could not be produced one solitary place in the Holy Scriptures which testified that either the Lord Himself or the apostles had ordered such a transfer of the Sabbath to Sunday, then it was not easy to answer the question: Who has transferred the Sabbath, and who has the right to do it?" George Sverdrup, ‘A New Day.’

    16 METHODIST CHURCH

    "This 'handwriting of ordinances' our Lord did blot out, take away, and nail to His cross. (Colossians 2: 14.) But the moral law contained in the Ten Commandments, and enforced by the prophets, He did not take away.... The moral law stands on an entirely different foundation from the ceremonial or ritual law. ...Every part of this law must remain in force upon all mankind and in all ages." -JOHN WESLEY, "Sermons on Several Occasions," 2-Vol. Edition, Vol. I, pages 221, 222.

    "No Christian whatsoever is free from the obedience of the commandments which are called moral." -"Methodist Church Discipline," (I904), page 23.

    "The Sabbath was made for MAN; not for the Hebrews, but for all men." -E.O. HAVEN, "Pillars of Truth," page 88.

    "The reason we observe the first day instead of the seventh is based on no positive command. One will search the Scriptures in vain for authority for changing from the seventh day to the first. The early Christians began to worship on the first day of the week because Jesus rose from the dead on that day. By and by, this day of worship was made also a day of rest, a legal holiday. This took place in the year 321.

    "The reason we observe the first day instead of the seventh is based on no positive command. One will search the Scriptures in vain for authority for changing from the seventh day to the first... Our Christian Sabbath, therefore, is not a matter of positive command. It is a gift of the church... "-CLOVIS G. CHAPPELL, "Ten Rules for Living," page 61.

    "Sabbath in the Hebrew language signifies rest, and is the seventh day of the week... and it must be confessed that there is no law in the New Testament concerning the first day." Charles Buck, A Theological Dictionary, "Sabbath"

    "In the days of very long ago the people of the world began to give names to everything, and they turned the sounds of the lips into words, so that the lips could speak a thought. In those days the people worshiped the sun because many words were made to tell of many thoughts about many things. The people became Christians and were ruled by an emperor whose name was Constantine. This emperor made Sunday the Christian Sabbath, because of the blessing of light and heat which came from the sun. So our Sunday is a sun-day, isn't it?" -Sunday School Advocate, Dec. 31, 1921.

    "The moral law contained in the Ten Commandments, and enforced by the prophets, He TASIE CHRIS CHIBUIKE did not take away. It was not the design of His coming to revoke any part of this. This is a law which never can be broken... Every part of this law must remain in force upon all mankind and in all ages; as not depending either on time or place, or any other circumstances liable to change, but on the nature of God and the nature of man, and their un­changeable relation to each other." -JOHN WESLEY, "Sermons on Several Occasions," Vol. I, Sermon XXV.

    "The Sabbath instituted in the beginning, and confirmed again and again by Moses and the prophets, has never been abrogated. A part of the moral law, not a jot or a tittle of its sanctity has been taken away." New York Herald 1874, on the Methodist Episcopal Bishops Pastoral 1874

    17 MISCELLANEOUS CHURCH

    "You will tell me that Saturday was the Jewish Sabbath, but that the Christian Sabbath has been changed to Sunday. Changed! But by whom? Who has authority to change an express commandment of Almighty God? When God has spoken and said, 'Thou shalt keep holy the seventh day,' who shall dare to say, 'Nay, thou mayest work and do all manner of business on the seventh day; but thou shalt keep holy the first day in its stead'? This is a most important question, which I know not how you can answer."

    "You are a Protestant, and you profess to go by the Bible and the Bible only; and yet in so important a matter as the observance of one day in seven as a holy day, you go against the plain letter of the Bible, and put another day in the place of that day which the Bible has commanded. The command to keep holy the seventh day is one of the Ten Commandments; you believe that the other nine are still binding; who gave you authority to tamper with the fourth? If you are consistent with your own principles, if you really follow the Bible and the Bible only, you ought to be able to produce some portion of the New Testament in which this fourth commandment is expressly altered." -"The Library of Christian Doctrine," pages 3, 4.

    "The first precept in the Bible is that of sanctifying the seventh day: 'God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it.' Genesis 2:3. This precept was confirmed by God in the Ten Commandments: 'Remember the Sabbath day to keep It holy. ...The seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God.' Exodus 20: 8, 10. On the other hand, Christ declares that He is not come to destroy the law, but to fulfil it. (Matthew 5: 17.) He Himself observed the Sabbath: 'And, as His custom was, He went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day.' Luke 4: r6. His disciples likewise observed it after His death: 'They . . . rested the Sabbath day, according to the commandment.' Luke 23: 56. Yet with all this weight of Scripture authority for keeping the Sabbath or seventh day holy, Protestants of all denominations make this a profane day and transfer the obligation of it to the first day of the week, or the Sunday. Now what authority have they for doing this? None at all but the unwritten word, or tradition of the Catholic Church, which declares that the apostle made the change in honour of Christ's resurrection, and the descent of the Holy Ghost on that day of the week." -JOHN MILNER, "The End of Religious Controversy," page 71.

    "Sabbath means, of course, Saturday, the seventh day of the week, but the early Christians changed the observance to Sunday, to honour the day on which Christ arose from the dead." -FULTON OURSLER. Cosmopolitan, Sept. 1951, pages 34, 35.

    "I do not pretend to be even an amateur scholar of the Scriptures. I read the Decalogue merely as an average man searching for guidance, and in the immortal 'Ten Words' I find a blueprint for the good life." -Id., page 33.

    "Most certainly the Commandments are needed today, perhaps more than ever before. Their divine message confronts us with a profound moral challenge in an epidemic of evil; a unifying message acceptable alike to Jew, Moslem, and Christian. Who, reading the Ten in the light of history and of current events, can doubt their identity with the eternal law of nature?" -Id., page 124.

    "The Sabbath is commanded to be kept on the seventh day. It could not be kept on any other day. To observe the first day of the week or the fourth is not to observe the Sabbath. . . . It was the last day of the week, after six days of work, that was to be kept holy. The observance of no other day would fulfil the law." -H. J. FLOWERS, B.A., B.D., "The Permanent Value of the Ten Commandments," page 13.

    "The evaluation of Sunday, the traditionally accepted day of the resurrection of Christ, has varied greatly throughout the centuries of the Christian Era. From time to time it has been confused with the seventh day of the week, the Sabbath. English ­speaking peoples have been the most consistent in perpetuating the erroneous assumption that the obligation of the fourth commandment has passed over to Sunday. In popular speech, Sunday is frequently, but erroneously, spoken of as the Sabbath." -F. M. SETZLER, Head Curator, Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institute, from a letter dated Sept. 1, 1949.

    "He that observes the Sabbath aright holds the history of that which it celebrates to be authentic, and therefore believes in the creation of the first man; in the creation of a fair abode for man in the space of six days; in the primeval and absolute creation of the heavens and the earth, and, as a necessary antecedent to all this, in the Creator, who at the close of His latest creative effort, rested on the seventh day. The Sabbath thus becomes a sign by which the believers in a historical revelation are distinguished from those who have allowed these great facts to fade from their remembrance.' - JAMES G. MURPHY, "Commentary on the Book of Exodus," comments on Exodus 20: 8-11.

    18 MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE

    "The Sabbath was binding in Eden, and it has been in force ever since. This fourth commandment begins with the word 'remember,' showing that the Sabbath already existed when God wrote the law on the tables of stone at Sinai. How can men claim that this one commandment has been done away with when they will admit that the other nine are still binding?" - D.L. MOODY, "Weighed and Wanting," page 47.

    "I honestly believe that this commandment [the fourth, or Sabbath commandment] is just as binding today as it ever was. I have talked with men who have said that it has been abrogated, but they have never been able to point to any place in the Bible where God repealed it. When Christ was on earth, He did nothing to set it aside; He freed it from the traces under which the scribes and Pharisees had put it, and gave it its true place. 'The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath.' It is just as practicable and as necessary for men today as it ever was-in fact, more than ever, because we live in such an intense age.' - Id., page 46.

    "This Fourth is not a commandment for one place, or one time, but for all places and times." D.L. Moody, at San Francisco, Jan. 1st, 1881.

    19 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH

    "The Christian Sabbath (Sunday) is not in the Scriptures, and was not by the primitive church called the Sabbath." Dwight's Theology, Vol. 14, p. 401.

    "A further argument for the perpetuity of the Sabbath we have in Matthew 24:20, Pray ye that your flight be not in the winter neither on the Sabbath day. But the final destruction of Jerusalem was after the Christian dispensation was fully set up (AD 70). Yet it is plainly implied in these words of the Lord that even then Christians were bound to strict observation of the Sabbath." Works of Jonathon Edwards, (Presby.) Vol. 4, p. 621.

    "We must not imagine that the coming of Christ has freed us from the authority of the law; for it is the eternal rule of a devout and holy life, and must therefore be as unchangeable as the justice of God, which it embraced, is constant and uniform." JOHN CALVIN, "Commentary on a Harmony of the Gospels," Vol. 1, page 277.

    "God instituted the Sabbath at the creation of man, setting apart the seventh day for the purpose, and imposed its observance as a universal and perpetual moral obligation upon the race." ­American Presbyterian Board of Publication, Tract No. 175.

    "The observance of the seventh-day Sabbath did not cease till it was abolished after the Christopher Crump empire became Christian," ­American Presbyterian Board of Publication, Tract No. 118.

    "The moral law doth for ever bind all, as well justified persons as others, to the obedience thereof; and that not only in regard to the matter contained in it, but also in respect of the authority of God the Creator who gave it. Neither doth Christ in the gospel in any way dissolve, but much strengthen this obligation." "Westminster Confession of Faith," Chap. 19, Art. 5.

    "The Sabbath is a part of the Decalogue-the Ten Commandments. This alone for ever settles the question as to the perpetuity of the institution ... Until, therefore, it can be shown that the whole moral law has been repealed, the Sabbath will stand...The teaching of Christ confirms the perpetuity of the Sabbath." - T.C. BLAKE, D.D., "Theology Condensed," pages 474, 475.

    "Sunday being the first day of which the Gentiles solemnly adored that planet and called it Sunday, partly from its influence on that day especially, and partly in respect to its divine body (as they conceived it) the Christians thought fit to keep the same day and the same name of it, that they might not appear carelessly peevish, and by that means hinder the conversion of the Gentiles, and bring a greater prejudice that might be otherwise taken against the gospel" T.M. Morer, Dialogues on the Lord's Day

    "There is no word, no hint in the New Testament about abstaining from work on Sunday. The observance of Ash Wednesday, or Lent, stands exactly on the same footing as the observance of Sunday. Into the rest of Sunday no Divine Law enters." Canon Eyton, in The Ten Commandments.

    "Some have tried to build the observance of Sunday upon Apostolic command, whereas the Apostles gave no command on the matter at all.... The truth is, so soon as we appeal to the litera scripta [literal writing] of the Bible, the Sabbatarians have the best of the argument." The Christian at Work, April 19, 1883, and Jan. 1884

    20 SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH

    "The sacred name of the Seventh day is Sabbath. This fact is too clear to require argument [Exodus 20:10 quoted]… on this point the plain teaching of the Word has been admitted in all ages… Not once did the disciples apply the Sabbath law to the first day of the week, -- that folly was left for a later age, nor did they pretend that the first day supplanted the seventh." Joseph Hudson Taylor, ‘The Sabbatic Question’, p. 14-17, 41.

    "The first four commandments set forth man's obligations directly toward God.... But when we keep the first four commandments, we are likely to keep the other six. . . . The fourth commandment sets forth God's claim on man's time and thought.... The six days of labour and the rest on the Sabbath are to be maintained as a witness to God's toil and rest in the creation. . . . No one of the ten words is of merely racial significance.... The Sabbath was established originally (long before Moses) in no spec
    The Sabbath Truth # 9 Sabbath History. Denominational Statements on the Sabbath. 1 CATHOLIC CHURCH It is well to remind the Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, and all other Christians, that the Bible does not support them anywhere in their observance of Sunday. Sunday is an institution of the Roman Catholic Church, and those who observe the day observe a commandment of the Catholic Church. —Priest Brady, in an address, reported in the Elizabeth, NJ ‘News’ on March 18, 1903. Protestants ... accept Sunday rather than Saturday as the day for public worship after the Catholic Church made the change... But the Protestant mind does not seem to realize that ... in observing Sunday, they are accepting the authority of the spokesman for the Church, the pope. —Our Sunday Visitor, February 5th, 1950. Of course these two old quotations are exactly correct. The Catholic Church designated Sunday as the day for corporate worship and gets full credit – or blame – for the change. —This Rock, The Magazine of Catholic Apologetics and Evangelization, p.8, June 1997 Q. Have you any other proofs that they(Protestants) are not guided by the Scripture? A. Yes; so many, that we cannot admit more than a mere specimen into this small work. They reject much that is clearly contained in Scripture, and profess more that is nowhere discoverable in that Divine Book. Q. Give some examples of both? A. They should, if the Scripture were their only rule, wash the feet of one another, according to the command of Christ, in the 13th chap. of St. John; —they should keep, not the Sunday, but the Saturday, according to the commandment, "Remember thou keep holy the SABBATH-day;" for this commandment has not, in Scripture, been changed or abrogated;... —Rev. Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism; New York in 1857, page 101 Imprimatuer Q. Have you any other way of proving that the Church has power to institute festivals of precept? A. Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her; —she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday the seventh day, a change for which there is no Scriptural authority. —Rev. Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism; New York in 1857, page 174 Q. In what manner can we show a Protestant, that he speaks unreasonably against fasts and abstinences? A. Ask him why he keeps Sunday, and not Saturday, as his day of rest, since he is unwilling either to fast or to abstain. If he reply, that the Scripture orders him to keep the Sunday, but says nothing as to fasting and abstinence, tell him the Scripture speaks of Saturday or the Sabbath, but gives no command anywhere regarding Sunday or the first day of the week. If, then he neglects Saturday as a day of rest and holiness, and substitutes Sunday in its place, and this merely because such was the usage of the ancient Church, should he not, if he wishes to act consistently, observe fasting and abstinence, because the ancient Church so ordained? —Rev. Stephen Keenan, A Doctrinal Catechism; New York in 1857, page 181 Question: Which is the Sabbath day? Answer: Saturday is the Sabbath day. Question: Why do we observe Sunday instead of Saturday? Answer: We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday. —Rev. Peter Geiermann C.SS.R., The Convert’s Catechism of Catholic Doctrine, p. 50 Q. Must not a sensible Protestant doubt seriously, when he finds that even the Bible is not followed as a rule by his co-religionists? A. Surely, when he sees them baptize infants, abrogate the Jewish Sabbath, and observe Sunday for which [pg. 7] there is no Scriptural authority; when he finds them neglect to wash one another's feet, which is expressly commanded, and eat blood and things strangled, which are expressly prohibited in Scripture. He must doubt, if he think at all. ... Q. Should not the Protestant doubt when he finds that he himself holds tradition as a guide? A. Yes, if he would but reflect that he has nothing but Catholic Tradition for keeping the Sunday holy; ... —Controversial Catechism by Stephen Keenan, New Edition, revised by Rev. George Cormack, published in London by Burns & Oates, Limited - New York, Cincinnati, Chicago: Benzinger Brothers, 1896, pages 6, 7. The Church, on the other hand, after changing the day of rest from the Jewish Sabbath, or seventh day of the week, to the first, made the Third Commandment refer to Sunday as the day to be kept holy as the Lord's Day. The Council of Trent (Sess. VI, can. xix) condemns those who deny that the Ten Commandments are binding on Christians. —The Catholic Encyclopedia, Commandments of God, Volume IV, © 1908 by Robert Appleton Company, Online Edition © 1999 by Kevin Knight, Nihil Obstat - Remy Lafort, Censor Imprimatur - +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York, page 153. The [Roman Catholic] Church changed the observance of the Sabbath to Sunday by right of the divine, infallible authority given to her by her founder, Jesus Christ. The Protestant claiming the Bible to be the only guide of faith, has no warrant for observing Sunday. In this matter the Seventh-day Adventist is the only consistent Protestant. —The Catholic Universe Bulletin, August 14, 1942, p. 4. All of us believe many things in regard to religion that we do not find in the Bible. For example, nowhere in the Bible do we find that Christ or the Apostles ordered that the Sabbath be changed from Saturday to Sunday. We have the commandment of God given to Moses to keep holy the Sabbath Day, that is the 7th day of the week, Saturday. Today most Christians keep Sunday because it has been revealed to us by the Church outside the Bible. —The Catholic Virginian, To Tell You The Truth,” Vol. 22, No. 49 (Oct. 3, 1947). ... you may read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation, and you will not find a single line authorizing the sanctification of Sunday. The Scriptures enforce the religious observance of Saturday, a day which we never sanctify. —The Faith of Our Fathers, by James Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop of Baltimore, 88th edition, page 89. Originally published in 1876, republished and Copyright 1980 by TAN Books and Publishers, Inc., pages 72-73. Deny the authority of the Church and you have no adequate or reasonable explanation or justification for the substitution of Sunday for Saturday in the Third - Protestant Fourth - Commandment of God... The Church is above the Bible, and this transference of Sabbath observance is proof of that fact.' —Catholic Record, September 1, 1923. But since Saturday, not Sunday, is specified in the Bible, isn't it curious that non-Catholics who profess to take their religion directly from the Bible and not the Church, observe Sunday instead of Saturday? Yes, of course, it is inconsistent; but this change was made about fifteen centuries before Protestantism was born, and by that time the custom was universally observed. They have continued the custom, even though it rests upon the authority of the Catholic Church and not upon an explicit text in the Bible. That observance remains as a reminder of the Mother Church from which the non-Catholic sects broke away - like a boy running away from home but still carrying in his pocket a picture of his mother or a lock of her hair. —The Faith of Millions Perhaps the boldest thing, the most revolutionary change the Church ever did, happened in the first century. The holy day, the Sabbath, was changed from Saturday to Sunday. "The Day of the Lord" (dies Dominica) was chosen, not from any directions noted in the Scriptures, but from the Church's sense of its own power. The day of resurrection, the day of Pentecost, fifty days later, came on the first day of the week. So this would be the new Sabbath. People who think that the Scriptures should be the sole authority, should logically become 7th Day Adventists, and keep Saturday holy. —Sentinel, Pastor's page, Saint Catherine Catholic Church, Algonac, Michigan, May 21, 1995 If Protestants would follow the Bible, they would worship God on the Sabbath Day. In keeping the Sunday they are following a law of the Catholic Church. —Albert Smith, Chancellor of the Archdiocese of Baltimore, replying for the Cardinal, in a letter dated February 10, 1920. The observance of Sunday by the Protestants is homage they pay, in spite of themselves, to the authority of the [Catholic] Church. —Monsignor Louis Segur, ‘Plain Talk about the Protestantism of Today’, p. 213. What Important Question Does the Papacy Ask Protestants? Protestants have repeatedly asked the papacy, "How could you dare to change God's law?" But the question posed to Protestants by the Catholic church is even more penetrating. Here it is officially: You will tell me that Saturday was the Jewish Sabbath, but that the Christian Sabbath has been changed to Sunday. Changed! but by whom? Who has authority to change an express commandment of Almighty God? When God has spoken and said, Thou shalt keep holy the seventh day, who shall dare to say, Nay, thou mayest work and do all manner of worldly business on the seventh day; but thou shalt keep holy the first day in its stead? This is a most important question, which I know not how you can answer. You are a Protestant, and you profess to go by the Bible and the Bible only; and yet in so important a matter as the observance of one day in seven as a holy day, you go against the plain letter of the Bible, and put another day in the place of that day which the Bible has commanded. The command to keep holy the seventh day is one of the ten commandments; you believe that the other nine are still binding; who gave you authority to tamper with the fourth? If you are consistent with your own principles, if you really follow the Bible and the Bible only, you ought to be able to produce some portion of the New Testament in which this fourth commandment is expressly altered. —Library of Christian Doctrine: Why Don't You Keep Holy the Sabbath-Day? (London: Burns and Oates, Ltd.), pp. 3, 4. There is but one church on the face of the earth which has the power, or claims power, to make laws binding on the conscience, binding before God, binding under penalty of hell-fire. For instance, the institution of Sunday. What right has any other church to keep this day? You answer by virtue of the third commandment (the papacy did away with the 2nd regarding the worship of graven images, and called the 4th the 3rd), which says 'Remember that thou keep holy the Sabbath day.' But Sunday is not the Sabbath. Any schoolboy knows that Sunday is the first day of the week. I have repeatedly offered one thousand dollars to anyone who will prove by the Bible alone that Sunday is the day we are bound to keep, and no one has called for the money. It was the holy Catholic Church that changed the day of rest from Saturday, the seventh day, to Sunday, the first day of the week. —T. Enright, C.S.S.R., in a lecture delivered in 1893. Of course the Catholic Church claims that the change was her act. And the act is a mark of her ecclesiastical power and authority in religious matters. —C. F. Thomas, Chancellor of Cardinal Gibbons, in answer to a letter regarding the change of the Sabbath, November 11, 1895. Tradition, not Scripture, is the rock on which the church of Jesus Christ is built. —Adrien Nampon, Catholic Doctrine as Defined by the Council of Trent, p. 157 The Pope is of so great authority and power that he can modify, explain, or interpret even divine law". The pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man, but of God, and he acts a vicegerent of God upon earth —Lucius Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca, art. Papa, II, Vol. VI, p. 29. The leader of the Catholic church is defined by the faith as the Vicar of Jesus Christ (and is accepted as such by believers). The Pope is considered the man on earth who "takes the place" of the Second Person of the omnipotent God of the Trinity. —John Paul II, Crossing the Threshold of Hope, p. 3, 1994 ...pastoral intuition suggested to the Church the christianization of the notion of Sunday as "the day of the sun", which was the Roman name for the day and which is retained in some modern languages.(29) This was in order to draw the faithful away from the seduction of cults which worshipped the sun, and to direct the celebration of the day to Christ, humanity's true 'sun'. —John Paul II, Dies Domini, 27. The day of Christ-Light, 1998 (Prominent protestant leaders agree with this statement - See here for a statement by Dr. E. T. Hiscox, author of the ‘Baptist Manual’) The Sun was a foremost god with heathen-dom…The sun has worshippers at this hour in Persia and other lands…. There is, in truth, something royal, kingly about the sun, making it a fit emblem of Jesus, the Sun of Justice. Hence the church in these countries would seem to have said, to 'Keep that old pagan name [Sunday]. It shall remain consecrated, sanctified.' And thus the pagan Sunday, dedicated to Balder, became the Christian Sunday, sacred to Jesus. —William Gildea, Doctor of Divinity, The Catholic World, March, 1894, p. 809 The retention of the old pagan name of Dies Solis, for Sunday is, in a great measure, owing to the union of pagan and Christian sentiment with which the first day of the week was recommended by Constantine to his subjects - pagan and Christian alike - as the 'venerable' day of the sun. —Arthur P. Stanley, History of the Eastern Church, p. 184 When St. Paul repudiated the works of the law, he was not thinking of the Ten Commandments, which are as unchangeable as God Himself is, which God could not change and still remain the infinitely holy God. —Our Sunday Visitor, Oct. 7, I951. Question: How prove you that the Church hath power to command feasts and holydays? Answer: By the very act of changing the Sabbath into Sunday, which Protestants allow of; and therefore they fondly contradict themselves, by keeping Sunday strictly, and breaking most other feasts commanded by the same Church. —Henry Tuberville, An Abridgment of the Christian Doctrine (1833 approbation), p.58 (Same statement in Manual of Christian Doctrine, ed. by Daniel Ferris [1916 ed.], p.67) Some theologians have held that God likewise directly determined the Sunday as the day of worship in the NEW LAW, that he himself has explicitly substituted Sunday for the Sabbath. But this theory is entirely abandoned. It is now commonly held that God simply gave His church the power to set aside whatever day or days she would deem suitable as holy days. The church chose Sunday, the first day of the week, and in the course of time added other days as holy days. —Vincent J. Kelly, Forbidden Sunday and Feast-Day Occupations, Washington, DC, Catholic University of America Press, Studies in Sacred Theology, No. 70.,1943, p. 2. If we consulted the Bible only, we should still have to keep holy the Sabbath Day, that is, Saturday, with the Jews, instead of Sunday; ... —A Course in Religion for Catholic High Schools and Academies, by Rev. John Laux M.A., Benzinger Brothers, 1936 edition, Part 1. Sunday is a Catholic institution, and... can be defended only on Catholic principles.... From beginning to end of Scripture there is not a single passage that warrants the transfer of weekly public worship from the last day of the week to the first. —Catholic Press, Aug. 25, 1900 The Sabbath was Saturday, not Sunday. The Church altered the observance of the Sabbath to the observance of Sunday. Protestants must be rather puzzled by the keeping of Sunday when God distinctly said, 'Keep holy the Sabbath Day.' The word Sunday does not come anywhere in the Bible, so, without knowing it they are obeying the authority of the Catholic Church. —Canon Cafferata, The Catechism Explained, p. 89. Reason and sense demand the acceptance of one or the other of these alternatives: either Protestantism and the keeping holy of Saturday, or Catholicity and the keeping holy of Sunday. Compromise is impossible. —John Cardinal Gibbons, The Catholic Mirror, December 23, 1893. 2 ANGLICAN CHURCH "And where are we told in the Scriptures that we are to keep the first day at all? We are commanded to keep the seventh; but we are nowhere commanded to keep the first day... The reason why we keep the first day of the week holy instead of the seventh is for the same reason that we observe many other things, not because the Bible, but because the Church, has enjoined it." Isaac Williams, Plain Sermons on the Catechism, pages 334, 336. 3 BAPTIST CHURCH “There was and is a command to keep holy the Sabbath day, but that Sabbath day was not Sunday. It will however be readily said, and with some show of triumph, that the Sabbath was transferred from the seventh to the first day of the week, with all its duties, privileges and sanctions. Earnestly desiring information on this subject, which I have studied for many years, I ask, where can the record of such a transaction be found: Not in the New Testament – absolutely not. There is no scriptural evidence of the change of the Sabbath institution from the Seventh to the first day of the week.” Dr. E. T. Hiscox, author of the ‘Baptist Manual’. "To me it seems unaccountable that Jesus, during three years' discussion with His disciples, often conversing with them upon the Sabbath question, discussing it in some of its various aspects, freeing it from its false [Jewish traditional] glosses, never alluded to any transference of the day; also, that during the forty days of His resurrection life, no such thing was intimated. Nor, so far as we know, did the Spirit, which was given to bring to their remembrance all things whatsoever that He had said unto them, deal with this question. Nor yet did the inspired apostles, in preaching the gospel, founding churches, counseling and instructing those founded, discuss or approach the subject. Of course I quite well know that Sunday did come into use in early Christian history as a religious day as we learn from the Christian Fathers and other sources. But what a pity that it comes branded with the mark of Paganism, and christened with the name of the sun-god, then adopted and sanctified by the Papal apostasy, and bequeathed as a sacred legacy to Protestantism." Dr. E. T. Hiscox, report of his sermon at the Baptist Minister's Convention, in 'New York Examiner,' November 16, 1893 (The leader / spokesman for the Roman Catholic Church agrees with this statement. See Below) "The Scriptures nowhere call the first day of the week the Sabbath. . .There is no Scriptural authority for so doing, nor of course, any Scriptural obligation." The Watchman. "We believe that the law of God is the eternal and unchangeable rule of His moral government."-" Baptist Church Manual," Art. 12. "There was never any formal or authoritative change from the Jewish seventh-day Sabbath to the Christian first-day observance." -WILLIAM OWEN CARVER, " The Lord's Day in Our Day," page 49. "There is nothing in Scripture that requires us to keep Sunday rather than Saturday as a holy day." Harold Lindsell (editor), Christianity Today, Nov. 5, 1976 4 BRETHREN CHURCH "With the views of the law and the Sabbath we once held ... and which are still held by perhaps the great majority of the most earnest Christians, we confess that we could not answer Adventists. What is more, neither before or since have I heard or read what would conclusively answer an Adventist in his Scriptural contention that the Seventh day is the Sabbath (Ex. 20:10). It is not 'one day in seven' as some put it, but 'the seventh day according to the commandment.' " Words of Truth and Grace, p. 281. 5 CHRISTIAN CHURCH "I do not believe that the Lord's day came in the room of the Jewish Sabbath, or that the Sabbath was changed from the seventh to the first day, for this plain reason, where there is no testimony, there can be no faith. Now there is no testimony in all the oracles of heaven that the Sabbath is changed, or that the Lord’s Day came in the room of it." Alexander Campbell, in The Reporter, October 8, 1921 "It has reversed the fourth commandment by doing away with the Sabbath of God's Word, and instituting Sunday as a holiday." - Dr. N. Summerbell, History of the Christian Church, Third Edition, p. 415 "There is no direct scriptural authority for designating the first day the Lord's day." - Dr. D. H. Lucas, Christian Oracle, Jan. 23, 1890. "The first day of the week is commonly called the Sabbath. This is a mistake. The Sabbath of the Bible was the day just preceding the first day of the week. The first day of the week is never called the Sabbath anywhere in the entire Scriptures. It is also an error to talk about the change of the Sabbath. There never was any change of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. There is not in any place in the Bible any intimation of such a change." First-Day Observance, pp. 17, 19. 6 DISCIPLES OF CHRIST CHURCH "There is no direct Scriptural authority for designating the first day ‘the Lord’s Day.’" Dr D.H. Lucas, Christian Oracle, January, 1890 7 CHURCH OF CHRIST "But we do not find any direct command from God, or instruction from the risen Christ, or admonition from the early apostles, that the first day is to be substituted for the seventh day Sabbath." "Let us be clear on this point. Though to the Christian 'that day, the first day of the week' is the most memorable of all days ... there is no command or warrant in the New Testament for observing it as a holy day." "The Roman Church selected the first day of the week in honour of the resurrection of Christ. ..." Bible Standard, May, 1916, Auckland, New Zealand. "... If the fourth command is binding upon us Gentiles by all means keep it. But let those who demand a strict observance of the Sabbath remember that the seventh day is the ONLY sabbath day commanded, and God never repealed that command. If you would keep the Sabbath, keep it; but Sunday is not the Sabbath. The argument of the 'Seventh-day Adventists' is on one point unassailable. It is the Seventh day not the first day that the command refers to." G. Alridge, Editor, The Bible Standard, April, 1916. "There is no direct Scriptural authority for designating the first day the Lord's day." -DR. D. H. LUCAS, Christian Oracle, Jan. 23, 1890. "The first day of the week is commonly called the Sabbath. This is a mistake. The Sabbath of the Bible was the day just preceding the first day of the week. The first day of the week is never called the Sabbath anywhere in the entire Scriptures. It is also an error to talk about the change of the Sabbath. There never was any change of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. There is not in any place in the Bible any intimation of such a change." -"First-Day Observance," pages 17, 19. "It has reversed the fourth commandment by doing away with the Sabbath of God's Word, and instituting Sunday as a holiday." DR. N. SUMMERBELL, "History of the Christian Church," Third Edition, page 4I5. "To command...men...to observe...the Lord's day...is contrary to the gospel." - "Memoirs of Alexander Campbell," Vol. 1, page 528. "It is clearly proved that the pastors of the churches have struck out one of God's ten words, which, not only in the Old Testament, but in all revelation, are the most emphatically regarded as the synopsis of all religion and morality." -ALEXANDER CAMPBELL, "Debate With Purcell," page 214. "I do not believe that the Lord's day came in the room of the Jewish Sabbath, or that the Sabbath was changed from the seventh to the first day, for this plain reason, where there is no testimony, there can be no faith. Now there is no testimony in all the oracles of heaven that the Sabbath was changed, or that the Lord's day came in the room of it." -ALEXANDER CAMPBELL, Washington Reporter, Oct. 8, 1821. 8 CHURCH OF ENGLAND "Many people think that Sunday is the Sabbath. But neither in the New Testament nor in the early church is there anything to suggest that we have any right to transfer the observance of the seventh day of the week to the first. The Sabbath was and is Saturday and not Sunday, and if it were binding on us then we should observe it on that day, and on no other." Rev. Lionel Beere, All-Saints Church, Ponsonby, N.Z. in Church and People, Sept. 1, 1947. "Nowhere in the Bible is it laid down that worship should be done on Sunday. Remember the Sabbath day to keep it holy. ...! That is Saturday." P. Carrington, Archbishop of Quebec, Oct. 27, 1949; cited in Prophetic Signs, p 12. "The observance of the first instead of the seventh day rests on the testimony of the church, and the church alone." Hobart Church News, July 2, 1894; cited in Prophetic Signs, p 14. "Where are we told in Scripture that we are to keep the first day at all? We are commanded to keep the Seventh; but we are nowhere commanded to keep the first day. The reason why we keep the first day holy instead of the seventh is for the same reason that we observe many things, not because the Bible, but because the Church, has enjoined them." Rev. Isaac Williams, Ser. on Catechism, p. 334. "The seventh day, the commandment says, is the Sabbath of The Lord thy God. No kind of arithmetic, no kind of almanac, can make seven equal one, nor the seventh mean the first, nor Saturday mean Sunday. ... The fact is that we are all Sabbath breakers, every one of us." Rev. Geo. Hodges. "Not any ecclesiastical writer of the first three centuries attributed the origin of Sunday observance either to Christ or to His apostles." -SIR WILLIAM DOMVILLE, "Examination of the Six Texts," pages 6, 7. (Supplement). "There is no word, no hint, in the New Testament about ab­staining from work on Sunday. . . . Into the rest of Sunday no divine law enters…, The observance of Ash Wednesday or Lent stands exactly on the same footing as the observance of Sunday." -CANON EYTON, 'The Ten Commandments," pages 52, 63, 65. "Is there any command in the New Testament to change the day of weekly rest from Saturday to Sunday? None." -"Manual of Christian Doctrine," page 127. "The Lord's day did not succeed in the place of the Sabbath....The Lord's day was merely an ecclesiastical institution. It was not introduced by virtue of the fourth commandment, because for almost three hundred years together they kept that day which was in that commandment...The primitive Christians did all manner of works upon the Lord's day, even in times of persecution, when they are the strictest observers of all the divine commandments; but in this they knew there was none." -BISHOP JEREMY TAYLOR, "Ductor Dubitantium," Part I, Book II, Chap. 2, Rule 6. Sec. 51, 59. "Sunday being the day on which the Gentiles solemnly adore that planet and called it Sunday, partly from its influence on that day especially, and partly in respect to its divine body (as they conceived it), the Christians thought fit to keep the same day and the same name of it, that they might not appear causelessly peevish, and by that means hinder the conversion of the Gentiles, and bring a greater prejudice than might be otherwise taken against the gospel." -T. M. MORER, "Dialogues on the Lord's Day," pages 22, 23. "The Puritan idea was historically unhappy. It made Sun­day into the Sabbath day. Even educated people call Sunday the Sabbath. Even clergymen do." "But, unless my reckoning is all wrong, the Sabbath day lasts twenty-four hours from six o'clock on Friday evening. It gives over, therefore, before we come to Sunday. If you suggest to a Sabbatarian that he ought to observe the Sabbath on the proper day, you arouse no enthusiasm. He at once replies that the day, not the principle, has been changed. But changed by whom? There is no injunction in the whole of the New Testament to Christians to change the Sabbath into Sunday.' - D. MORSE­BOYCOTT, Daily Herald, London, Feb. 26, 1931. "The Christian church made no formal, but a gradual and almost unconscious transference of the one day to the other." - F.W. FARRAR, D.D., "The Voice From Sinai," page 167. "Take which you will, either of the Fathers or the moderns, and we shall find no Lord's day instituted by any apostolical man­date; no Sabbath set on foot by them upon the first day of the week." -PETER HEYLYN, "History of the Sabbath," page 410. "Merely to denounce the tendency to secularise Sunday is as futile as it is easy. What we want is to find some principle, to which as Christians we can appeal, and on which we can base both our conduct and our advice. We turn to the New Testament, and we look in vain for any authoritative rule. There is no recorded word of Christ, there is no word of any of the apostles, which tells how we should keep Sunday, or indeed that we should keep it at all. It is disappointing, for it would make our task much easier if we could point to a definite rule, which left us no option but simple obedience or disobedience. . . . There is no rule for Sunday observance, either in Scripture or history." -DR. STEPHEN, Bishop of Newcastle, N.S.W., in an address reported in the Newcastle Morn­ing Herald, May 14, 1924. 9 CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH "The Christian Sabbath' [Sunday] is not in the Scripture, and was not by the primitive [early Christian] church called the Sabbath." Timothy Dwight, Theology, sermon 107, 1818 ed., Vol. IV, p49 Note: Timothy Dwight (1752-1817) was president of Yale University from 1795-1817. "It is quite clear that, however rigidly or devoutly we may spend Sunday, we are not keeping the Sabbath ... The Sabbath was founded on a specific divine command. We can plead no such command for the obligation to observe Sunday ... There is not a single sentence in the New Testament to suggest that we incur any penalty by violating the supposed sanctity of Sunday." Dr. Dale, The Ten Commandments, pp. 106, 107. "It must be confessed that there is no law in the New Testament concerning the first day." Buck's Theological Dictionary page 403. "There is no command in the Bible requiring us to observe the first day of the week as the Christian Sabbath." -ORIN FOWLER, A.M., "Mode and Subjects of Baptism." "The current notion that Christ and His apostles authoritatively substituted the first day for the seventh, is absolutely without any authority in the New Testament." -DR. LYMAN ABBOTT, Christian Union, Jan. 18, 1882. 10 AMERICAN CONGREGATIONALIST CHURCH "The current notion that Christ and His apostles authoritatively substituted the first day for the seventh, is absolutely without any authority in the New Testament." Dr. Layman Abbot, in the Christian Union, June 26, 1890. 11 EPISCOPALIAN CHURCH "We have made the change from the seventh day to the first day, from Saturday to Sunday, on the authority of the one holy, Catholic, Apostolic Church of Christ." Bishop Symour, Why We keep Sunday. "The Bible commandment says on the seventh-day thou shalt rest. That is Saturday. Nowhere in the Bible is it laid down that worship should be done on Sunday." Phillip Carrington, quoted in Toronto Daily Star, Oct 26, 1949 [Carrington (1892-), Anglican archbishop of Quebec, spoke the above in a message on this subject delivered to a packed assembly of clergymen. It was widely reported at the time in the news media]. 12 PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH "The day is now changed from the seventh to the first day ... but as we meet with no Scriptural direction for the change, we may conclude it was done by the authority of the church." ‘Explanation of Catechism’ 13 INFIDEL CHURCH "Probably very few Christians are aware of the fact that what they call the 'Christian Sabbath' (Sunday) is of pagan origin." "The first observance of Sunday- that history records is in the fourth century', when Constantine issued an edict (not requiring its religious observance, but simply abstinence from work) reading, 'let all the judges and people of the town rest and all the various trades be suspended on the venerable day of the sun.' At the time of the issue of this edict, Constantine was a sun-worshipper; therefore it could have had no relation whatever to Christianity." - ­HENRY M. TABER. "Faith or Fact" (preface by Robert G. Ingersoll), page 112. "I challenge any priest or minister of the Christian religion to show me the slightest authority for the religious observance of Sunday. And, if such cannot be shown by them, why is it that they are constantly preaching about Sunday as a holy day? ...The claim that Sunday takes the place of Saturday, and that because the Jews were supposed to be commanded to keep the seventh day of the week holy, therefore the first day of the week should be so kept by Christians, is so utterly absurd as to be hardly worth considering....That Paul habitually observed and preached on the seventh day of the week, is shown in Acts 18:4-'And be reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath' (Saturday)." -Id., pages ,114, 116. 14 LUTHERAN CHURCH "The observance of the Lord's Day (Sunday) is founded not on any command of God, but on the authority of the Church." Augsburg Confession of Faith. "They [the Catholics] allege the Sabbath changed into Sunday, the Lord's day, contrary to the Decalogue, as it appears, neither is there any example more boasted of than the changing of the Sabbath day. Great, say they, is the power and authority of the church, since it dispensed with one of the Ten Commandments." -Augsburg Confession of Faith, Art. 28, par. 9. "They [Roman Catholics] allege the change of the Sabbath into the Lord's day, as it seemeth, to the Decalogue [the ten commandments]; and they have no example more in their mouths than they change of the Sabbath. They will needs have the Church's power to be very great, because it hath dispensed with the precept of the Decalogue." The Augsburg Confession, 1530 A.D. (Lutheran), part 2, art 7, in Philip Schaff, the Creeds of Christiandom, 4th Edition, vol 3, p64 [this important statement was made by the Lutherans and written by Melanchthon, only thirteen years after Luther nailed his theses to the door and began the Reformation]. "For up to this day mankind has absolutely trifled with the original and most special revelation of the Holy God, the ten words written upon the tables of the Law from Sinai." -"Crown Theological Library," page I78. "The Christians in the ancient church very soon distinguished the first day of the week, Sunday; however, not as a Sabbath, but as an assembly day of the church, to study the Word of God together, and to celebrate the ordinances one with another: without a shadow of doubt, this took place as early as the first part of the second century." -Bishop GRIMELUND, "History of the Sabbath," page 60. "The festival of Sunday, like all other festivals, was always only a human ordinance."- AUGUSTUS NEANDER, "History of the Christian Religion and Church," Vol. 1, page 186. "I wonder exceedingly how it came to be imputed to me that I should reject the law of Ten Commandments...Whosoever abrogates the law must of necessity abrogate sin also." -MARTIN LUTHER, Spiritual Antichrist," pages 71, 72. "We have seen how gradually the impression of the Jewish Sabbath faded from the mind of the Christian church, and how completely the newer thought underlying the observance of the first day took possession of the church. We have seen that the Christian of the first three centuries never confused one with the other, but for a time celebrated both." The Sunday Problem, a study book by the Lutheran Church (1923) p.36 "But they err in teaching that Sunday has taken the place of the Old Testament Sabbath and therefore must be kept as the seventh day had to be kept by the children of Israel .... These churches err in their teaching, for scripture has in no way ordained the first day of the week in place of the Sabbath. There is simply no law in the New Testament to that effect." John Theodore Mueller, Sabbath or Sunday, pp.15, 16 15 LUTHERAN FREE CHURCH "For when there could not be produced one solitary place in the Holy Scriptures which testified that either the Lord Himself or the apostles had ordered such a transfer of the Sabbath to Sunday, then it was not easy to answer the question: Who has transferred the Sabbath, and who has the right to do it?" George Sverdrup, ‘A New Day.’ 16 METHODIST CHURCH "This 'handwriting of ordinances' our Lord did blot out, take away, and nail to His cross. (Colossians 2: 14.) But the moral law contained in the Ten Commandments, and enforced by the prophets, He did not take away.... The moral law stands on an entirely different foundation from the ceremonial or ritual law. ...Every part of this law must remain in force upon all mankind and in all ages." -JOHN WESLEY, "Sermons on Several Occasions," 2-Vol. Edition, Vol. I, pages 221, 222. "No Christian whatsoever is free from the obedience of the commandments which are called moral." -"Methodist Church Discipline," (I904), page 23. "The Sabbath was made for MAN; not for the Hebrews, but for all men." -E.O. HAVEN, "Pillars of Truth," page 88. "The reason we observe the first day instead of the seventh is based on no positive command. One will search the Scriptures in vain for authority for changing from the seventh day to the first. The early Christians began to worship on the first day of the week because Jesus rose from the dead on that day. By and by, this day of worship was made also a day of rest, a legal holiday. This took place in the year 321. "The reason we observe the first day instead of the seventh is based on no positive command. One will search the Scriptures in vain for authority for changing from the seventh day to the first... Our Christian Sabbath, therefore, is not a matter of positive command. It is a gift of the church... "-CLOVIS G. CHAPPELL, "Ten Rules for Living," page 61. "Sabbath in the Hebrew language signifies rest, and is the seventh day of the week... and it must be confessed that there is no law in the New Testament concerning the first day." Charles Buck, A Theological Dictionary, "Sabbath" "In the days of very long ago the people of the world began to give names to everything, and they turned the sounds of the lips into words, so that the lips could speak a thought. In those days the people worshiped the sun because many words were made to tell of many thoughts about many things. The people became Christians and were ruled by an emperor whose name was Constantine. This emperor made Sunday the Christian Sabbath, because of the blessing of light and heat which came from the sun. So our Sunday is a sun-day, isn't it?" -Sunday School Advocate, Dec. 31, 1921. "The moral law contained in the Ten Commandments, and enforced by the prophets, He [Christ] did not take away. It was not the design of His coming to revoke any part of this. This is a law which never can be broken... Every part of this law must remain in force upon all mankind and in all ages; as not depending either on time or place, or any other circumstances liable to change, but on the nature of God and the nature of man, and their un­changeable relation to each other." -JOHN WESLEY, "Sermons on Several Occasions," Vol. I, Sermon XXV. "The Sabbath instituted in the beginning, and confirmed again and again by Moses and the prophets, has never been abrogated. A part of the moral law, not a jot or a tittle of its sanctity has been taken away." New York Herald 1874, on the Methodist Episcopal Bishops Pastoral 1874 17 MISCELLANEOUS CHURCH "You will tell me that Saturday was the Jewish Sabbath, but that the Christian Sabbath has been changed to Sunday. Changed! But by whom? Who has authority to change an express commandment of Almighty God? When God has spoken and said, 'Thou shalt keep holy the seventh day,' who shall dare to say, 'Nay, thou mayest work and do all manner of business on the seventh day; but thou shalt keep holy the first day in its stead'? This is a most important question, which I know not how you can answer." "You are a Protestant, and you profess to go by the Bible and the Bible only; and yet in so important a matter as the observance of one day in seven as a holy day, you go against the plain letter of the Bible, and put another day in the place of that day which the Bible has commanded. The command to keep holy the seventh day is one of the Ten Commandments; you believe that the other nine are still binding; who gave you authority to tamper with the fourth? If you are consistent with your own principles, if you really follow the Bible and the Bible only, you ought to be able to produce some portion of the New Testament in which this fourth commandment is expressly altered." -"The Library of Christian Doctrine," pages 3, 4. "The first precept in the Bible is that of sanctifying the seventh day: 'God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it.' Genesis 2:3. This precept was confirmed by God in the Ten Commandments: 'Remember the Sabbath day to keep It holy. ...The seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God.' Exodus 20: 8, 10. On the other hand, Christ declares that He is not come to destroy the law, but to fulfil it. (Matthew 5: 17.) He Himself observed the Sabbath: 'And, as His custom was, He went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day.' Luke 4: r6. His disciples likewise observed it after His death: 'They . . . rested the Sabbath day, according to the commandment.' Luke 23: 56. Yet with all this weight of Scripture authority for keeping the Sabbath or seventh day holy, Protestants of all denominations make this a profane day and transfer the obligation of it to the first day of the week, or the Sunday. Now what authority have they for doing this? None at all but the unwritten word, or tradition of the Catholic Church, which declares that the apostle made the change in honour of Christ's resurrection, and the descent of the Holy Ghost on that day of the week." -JOHN MILNER, "The End of Religious Controversy," page 71. "Sabbath means, of course, Saturday, the seventh day of the week, but the early Christians changed the observance to Sunday, to honour the day on which Christ arose from the dead." -FULTON OURSLER. Cosmopolitan, Sept. 1951, pages 34, 35. "I do not pretend to be even an amateur scholar of the Scriptures. I read the Decalogue merely as an average man searching for guidance, and in the immortal 'Ten Words' I find a blueprint for the good life." -Id., page 33. "Most certainly the Commandments are needed today, perhaps more than ever before. Their divine message confronts us with a profound moral challenge in an epidemic of evil; a unifying message acceptable alike to Jew, Moslem, and Christian. Who, reading the Ten in the light of history and of current events, can doubt their identity with the eternal law of nature?" -Id., page 124. "The Sabbath is commanded to be kept on the seventh day. It could not be kept on any other day. To observe the first day of the week or the fourth is not to observe the Sabbath. . . . It was the last day of the week, after six days of work, that was to be kept holy. The observance of no other day would fulfil the law." -H. J. FLOWERS, B.A., B.D., "The Permanent Value of the Ten Commandments," page 13. "The evaluation of Sunday, the traditionally accepted day of the resurrection of Christ, has varied greatly throughout the centuries of the Christian Era. From time to time it has been confused with the seventh day of the week, the Sabbath. English ­speaking peoples have been the most consistent in perpetuating the erroneous assumption that the obligation of the fourth commandment has passed over to Sunday. In popular speech, Sunday is frequently, but erroneously, spoken of as the Sabbath." -F. M. SETZLER, Head Curator, Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institute, from a letter dated Sept. 1, 1949. "He that observes the Sabbath aright holds the history of that which it celebrates to be authentic, and therefore believes in the creation of the first man; in the creation of a fair abode for man in the space of six days; in the primeval and absolute creation of the heavens and the earth, and, as a necessary antecedent to all this, in the Creator, who at the close of His latest creative effort, rested on the seventh day. The Sabbath thus becomes a sign by which the believers in a historical revelation are distinguished from those who have allowed these great facts to fade from their remembrance.' - JAMES G. MURPHY, "Commentary on the Book of Exodus," comments on Exodus 20: 8-11. 18 MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE "The Sabbath was binding in Eden, and it has been in force ever since. This fourth commandment begins with the word 'remember,' showing that the Sabbath already existed when God wrote the law on the tables of stone at Sinai. How can men claim that this one commandment has been done away with when they will admit that the other nine are still binding?" - D.L. MOODY, "Weighed and Wanting," page 47. "I honestly believe that this commandment [the fourth, or Sabbath commandment] is just as binding today as it ever was. I have talked with men who have said that it has been abrogated, but they have never been able to point to any place in the Bible where God repealed it. When Christ was on earth, He did nothing to set it aside; He freed it from the traces under which the scribes and Pharisees had put it, and gave it its true place. 'The Sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath.' It is just as practicable and as necessary for men today as it ever was-in fact, more than ever, because we live in such an intense age.' - Id., page 46. "This Fourth is not a commandment for one place, or one time, but for all places and times." D.L. Moody, at San Francisco, Jan. 1st, 1881. 19 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH "The Christian Sabbath (Sunday) is not in the Scriptures, and was not by the primitive church called the Sabbath." Dwight's Theology, Vol. 14, p. 401. "A further argument for the perpetuity of the Sabbath we have in Matthew 24:20, Pray ye that your flight be not in the winter neither on the Sabbath day. But the final destruction of Jerusalem was after the Christian dispensation was fully set up (AD 70). Yet it is plainly implied in these words of the Lord that even then Christians were bound to strict observation of the Sabbath." Works of Jonathon Edwards, (Presby.) Vol. 4, p. 621. "We must not imagine that the coming of Christ has freed us from the authority of the law; for it is the eternal rule of a devout and holy life, and must therefore be as unchangeable as the justice of God, which it embraced, is constant and uniform." JOHN CALVIN, "Commentary on a Harmony of the Gospels," Vol. 1, page 277. "God instituted the Sabbath at the creation of man, setting apart the seventh day for the purpose, and imposed its observance as a universal and perpetual moral obligation upon the race." ­American Presbyterian Board of Publication, Tract No. 175. "The observance of the seventh-day Sabbath did not cease till it was abolished after the [Roman] empire became Christian," ­American Presbyterian Board of Publication, Tract No. 118. "The moral law doth for ever bind all, as well justified persons as others, to the obedience thereof; and that not only in regard to the matter contained in it, but also in respect of the authority of God the Creator who gave it. Neither doth Christ in the gospel in any way dissolve, but much strengthen this obligation." "Westminster Confession of Faith," Chap. 19, Art. 5. "The Sabbath is a part of the Decalogue-the Ten Commandments. This alone for ever settles the question as to the perpetuity of the institution ... Until, therefore, it can be shown that the whole moral law has been repealed, the Sabbath will stand...The teaching of Christ confirms the perpetuity of the Sabbath." - T.C. BLAKE, D.D., "Theology Condensed," pages 474, 475. "Sunday being the first day of which the Gentiles solemnly adored that planet and called it Sunday, partly from its influence on that day especially, and partly in respect to its divine body (as they conceived it) the Christians thought fit to keep the same day and the same name of it, that they might not appear carelessly peevish, and by that means hinder the conversion of the Gentiles, and bring a greater prejudice that might be otherwise taken against the gospel" T.M. Morer, Dialogues on the Lord's Day "There is no word, no hint in the New Testament about abstaining from work on Sunday. The observance of Ash Wednesday, or Lent, stands exactly on the same footing as the observance of Sunday. Into the rest of Sunday no Divine Law enters." Canon Eyton, in The Ten Commandments. "Some have tried to build the observance of Sunday upon Apostolic command, whereas the Apostles gave no command on the matter at all.... The truth is, so soon as we appeal to the litera scripta [literal writing] of the Bible, the Sabbatarians have the best of the argument." The Christian at Work, April 19, 1883, and Jan. 1884 20 SOUTHERN BAPTIST CHURCH "The sacred name of the Seventh day is Sabbath. This fact is too clear to require argument [Exodus 20:10 quoted]… on this point the plain teaching of the Word has been admitted in all ages… Not once did the disciples apply the Sabbath law to the first day of the week, -- that folly was left for a later age, nor did they pretend that the first day supplanted the seventh." Joseph Hudson Taylor, ‘The Sabbatic Question’, p. 14-17, 41. "The first four commandments set forth man's obligations directly toward God.... But when we keep the first four commandments, we are likely to keep the other six. . . . The fourth commandment sets forth God's claim on man's time and thought.... The six days of labour and the rest on the Sabbath are to be maintained as a witness to God's toil and rest in the creation. . . . No one of the ten words is of merely racial significance.... The Sabbath was established originally (long before Moses) in no spec
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 32 Views
  • How Are You Wired?
    By Charles Stambaugh

    A few years ago, my son purchased a house that was built in the early 1950’s. It was a one-owner home, and the owner did a
    number of electrical improvements, himself. Well, I would not call them improvements. Most of the house was wired backwards, with the hot and neutral switched. At many places, thin, two-wire extension cords were in the walls. There were exposed live wires. There was a switch to a big attic fan that was just hanging with a taped fuse and very brittle wire. There was an old panel box in which the breakers would not open the circuit. It took an electrician 80 hours, just to make it safe, and fifteen months later, he is still making corrections.

    Electric lighting came to Chicago in 1880, when the Palmer House Hotel installed electric lights in time for that year's Republican National Convention. Later that year, in Philadelphia, the first electric lights were strung along a ten-block stretch of Chestnut Street. By 1920, all of the nation's major cities had competing electric companies, each with its own sets of poles and wires. Up to the 1930s, the earliest standardized method of wiring in buildings was knob and tube wiring: single conductors with ceramic tubes, forming protective channels through joists and ceramic knobs. to provide support and air between the wire and the lumber. The first rubber-insulated cable for building wiring was introduced in 1922. Over time, rubber-insulated cables become brittle because of exposure to oxygen. About 1950, PVC insulation and jackets were introduced for residential wiring. New techniques and regulations are constantly improving, making electric power safer and more efficient in our homes.

    When a person is said to be wired, it often refers to them being hyperactive. Just like a live, broken power line, their actions are bouncing around with lots of noise and excitement, but with few positive results. You try to stay away from this type of person. Drugs, caffeine, and sugar can make a person wired. Being wired can also refer to a person’s normal personality and how they think and act. This is affected by their genes, how they were raised, their environment, what they were taught and their faith. Some may be wired better than others.

    This means that like my son’s house, all our wiring must be replaced.

    “But as it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” Rom 3:9, 23.

    “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Rom 2:23

    “And be not conformed to this world but be ye transformed..” Rom 12:2

    “Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.” John 3:7

    “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.” II Cor. 5:17

    *All verses are from the KJV.
    How Are You Wired? By Charles Stambaugh A few years ago, my son purchased a house that was built in the early 1950’s. It was a one-owner home, and the owner did a number of electrical improvements, himself. Well, I would not call them improvements. Most of the house was wired backwards, with the hot and neutral switched. At many places, thin, two-wire extension cords were in the walls. There were exposed live wires. There was a switch to a big attic fan that was just hanging with a taped fuse and very brittle wire. There was an old panel box in which the breakers would not open the circuit. It took an electrician 80 hours, just to make it safe, and fifteen months later, he is still making corrections. Electric lighting came to Chicago in 1880, when the Palmer House Hotel installed electric lights in time for that year's Republican National Convention. Later that year, in Philadelphia, the first electric lights were strung along a ten-block stretch of Chestnut Street. By 1920, all of the nation's major cities had competing electric companies, each with its own sets of poles and wires. Up to the 1930s, the earliest standardized method of wiring in buildings was knob and tube wiring: single conductors with ceramic tubes, forming protective channels through joists and ceramic knobs. to provide support and air between the wire and the lumber. The first rubber-insulated cable for building wiring was introduced in 1922. Over time, rubber-insulated cables become brittle because of exposure to oxygen. About 1950, PVC insulation and jackets were introduced for residential wiring. New techniques and regulations are constantly improving, making electric power safer and more efficient in our homes. When a person is said to be wired, it often refers to them being hyperactive. Just like a live, broken power line, their actions are bouncing around with lots of noise and excitement, but with few positive results. You try to stay away from this type of person. Drugs, caffeine, and sugar can make a person wired. Being wired can also refer to a person’s normal personality and how they think and act. This is affected by their genes, how they were raised, their environment, what they were taught and their faith. Some may be wired better than others. This means that like my son’s house, all our wiring must be replaced. “But as it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” Rom 3:9, 23. “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.” Rom 2:23 “And be not conformed to this world but be ye transformed..” Rom 12:2 “Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again.” John 3:7 “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.” II Cor. 5:17 *All verses are from the KJV.
    Like
    1
    0 Commenti 0 condivisioni 64 Views
  • A CALL TO GO DEEPER WITH GOD
    The Nature Of The Deeper Life.
    What exactly is meant by the Deeper Life in the Spirit? Astonishingly few Christians have the remotest idea, nor is the subject familiar to most of the believers who have received the experience of the baptism in the Holy Spirit. Thousands of believers today are discovering that there is a deeper experience with God after salvation; namely, the baptism in the Holy Spirit, as God in this present hour is pouring out His Spirit upon all flesh as foretold by the Prophet Joel (2:28f.). Countless thousands in all denominations are experiencing the reality of the promise in Acts 2:38-39. However, it comes as a surprise to most of these to learn, after they have received this experience, that they still have not attained God's highest purpose for them, but that the baptism in the Holy Spirit was, in reality, the "means" to a greater spiritual experience—the fullness of God Himself (Eph. 3:19). The deeper life in the Spirit is the Spirit-led life (Rom. 8; Gal. 5:16-25); it is the crucified life (Gal. 2:20); it is a life of total faith in and dependence upon God (Mt. 6:33); and it is the Spirit-filled believer's growth "unto a full-grown man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ" (Eph. 4:13).

    How is this deeper life in the Spirit to be attained?
    The message of the deeper life is basically the message of the cross. The way into the deeper life in the Spirit is the way of the cross. It means to take up the cross and follow Jesus. It is, in a word, the death of the self-life. God, in this hour, is calling a people to walk on a higher spiritual level than they have ever experienced before and He is offering them nothing less than the fulness of Himself! The deeper life is walking in the Spirit in total commitment as disciples—the future goal is the fullness of God.

    More and more disciples who have entered into the glorious experience of the baptism of the Holy Spirit are now being brought by the Spirit into a place of the crucifixion and death of "self" as the essential condition to receiving the fullness of God. To the extent one is filled with "self," he is, of necessity, to that extent not filled with the presence of God. The deeper life in the Spirit is not some mere doctrine to be studied with the intellect, discussed, and then forgotten; but it is a real experience with Christ, as the Holy Spirit brings us into conformity to the death of Christ, so that His resurrection life and power may be manifested fully in us. This is the message of the hour. God is at this very moment preparing a Body of believers which He intends to bring into the fulness of Himself. They will experience the fullness of Christ's resurrection life and power and be used to fulfill His glorious purposes in the restoration of all things now at the consummation of the age (Acts 3:21). For those who are unfamiliar with this great truth we suggest a reading at this point of some of the more significant passages dealing with the deeper life: Matthew 5-7; 20:25-28; Mark 11:22-24; Luke 9:57-62; 14:25f.; Romans 8; 12:1-2; Galatians 2:20; 5:16-25; 6:14; Ephesians 3:1-19; 4:7-16; Philippians 2:5-8; 3:10; Colossians 3: If.; I Peter 2:19-23; 4:1-16; Revelation 2-3.

    The Need For The Deeper Life.
    The present age is characterized by two evils affecting both the secular and religious areas of life. One concerns moral discernment; the other involves moral authority. The spiritual and moral character of the present age indicates that conditions have deteriorated to such a point that the only ultimate solution, as well as the greatest need of Christianity at this time, is the restoration of the power and presence of the Holy Spirit in the Church. This is not to be construed to mean some sort of mystical empowering of the present religious institution, whereby its current programs, organization and methods are made more effective, but the need is for a personal encounter with the Holy Spirit by individual Christians in an experience identical with that received by the disciples at Pentecost.

    To compensate for its lack of power and effectiveness against the present-day flood of wickedness and unbelief, the Church has turned to such substitutes as increased religious activity, new methods and dynamic programs, as well as the merger of denominations in order to multiply its membership and increase its outreach. However sincere the effort may be on the part of some, all such attempts are destined to fail, just as they have in the past; for man cannot restore life to the body by means of artificial respiration when the spirit has departed, "for . . . the body without the spirit is dead" (Jam. 2:26). Only an effusion of power from on high within the lives of Christians themselves can deliver the contemporary Laodicean Church from the moral and spiritual chaos affecting the whole of mankind in this hour. The imperative need of the restoration of the sovereign operation and ministry of the Holy Spirit once more in the Church will be seen, we believe, from the following discussion of the two moral and spiritual characteristics of the age in which we live.

    It is an age without moral and spiritual discernment.
    Although the present age has been described by some observers as an age of scientific progress, human achievement, and tremendous advancements into new frontiers of technology, it may, from a moral standpoint at least, be more accurately described as an age of moral and spiritual crisis, reflected in such things as the phenomenal increase in crime, war, and drug addiction, the almost universal preoccupation with sex, the general disregard for authority, the great social upheavals and racial strife, and the almost abysmal lack of moral understanding and concern on every hand. We find ourselves living in an age analogous to the dark ages of the Judges in which "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judg. 21:25). The great apostasy of our day and the perilous times in which we live were foretold by the Apostle Paul as characterizing the last days:

    This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, truce-breakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof (2 Tim 3:1-5).
    Truly it is an age when men and women, in many respects, seem to have lost the capacity for moral discernment, calling darkness light and evil good, as was true of Israel in Isaiah's time when he declared, "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter" (Isa. 5:20).

    As in the period of the Judges, young and old alike consider themselves adequate authorities in spiritual and moral matters, judging what is right and wrong, scorning all attempts at instruction or restraint as outmoded "authoritarianism." The carefree moral philosophy of today is conformity and compromise. It is a time when, even among professing Christians, being "accepted" by the group seems to be more important than being accepted by God. The distinction between the sacred and the secular is rapidly becoming more difficult to discern; there is a loss of a sense of reverence toward God and sacred things; the concept of holiness in the life and character of the Christian is for the most part a thing of the past; and a lack of respect for parents and authority by the younger generation is reflected in a lack of respect for and fear of God.

    Within Christendom itself the Church and family as the center of interest has been largely replaced with secular interests, and the once quiet Christian home is now monopolized by TV and rock music. Two global conflicts in this century, together with the constant turmoil, world-wide unrest, confusion, and uncertainty about the future have taken their toll, resulting in moral decay, increased drunkenness, divorce, juvenile delinquency and crime, as well as a loss in spiritual concern. Modern scientific achievements and technological improvements have, in spite of their beneficial results, only added to the problem by putting at our disposal hundreds of improvements to save time and make life easier, but providing thereby more time for development of the secular life, leisure, pleasure and sin.

    It is an age without moral and spiritual authority.
    The prevailing moral philosophy of this age can be characterized by three words: everything is relative. Morals are relative to time, place, and circumstance. Conduct is largely determined by the principle "when in Rome do as the Romans do." It is an age in which that which is popular and acceptable by the majority is right. The erroneous notion that "the end justifies the means" frequently prevails within, as well as without, the confines of Christendom. "Truth" and "right" are whatever produce results and work; failure is wrong and cannot be tolerated. Conscience is explained as merely the childhood memory of the "do" and "don't" of one's parents; so-called sins are, in reality, "mistakes" or "errors in judgment" in our evolution to a higher morality; and pleasure and happiness, as good ends in themselves, are to be pursued for their own sake.

    What is responsible for such moral and spiritual confusion? It is because, for the majority at least, there is no longer an objective moral authority to guide their lives and conduct... to teach them truth ... to indicate the difference between right and wrong ... or to establish a standard. In a word, it is because, in this age of materialism and skepticism, men have lost faith in the integrity of the Holy Scriptures, and there remains, therefore, no reliable, unchanging standard of right to measure conduct and character by. Moral conduct is largely determined by the principle of expediency. Without an infallible objective moral standard (the Word of God) the principle of expediency reigns. If it works, if it relieves pain or displeasure, and if it promotes one's welfare and happiness, then it is right.

    Too often the contemporary Church, denying the inerrancy of Scripture and influenced by the principle of expediency, asks but one question in conducting its affairs, in securing its funds, or in promoting its programs and institutions— "Will it work?" As a result, the Church has, more and more, come to resemble the secular community in which it exists, reflecting its customs, attitudes and mores, rather than being seen as the moral and spiritual influence upon the community. Moreover, it has become increasingly indifferent to the moral declension, decay, and spiritual shallowness within its own confines, and as a consequence, can speak with little moral and spiritual authority to the community at large.

    What is the solution in an age without spiritual discernment and authority for those who, possessing a measure of spiritual awareness and concern, desire to walk in the ways of truth and faithfulness? God Himself has provided the answer to the dilemma, enabling, thereby, the sincere Christian to rediscover the distinctiveness of his calling to be the "salt of the earth" and "light of the world." The present move of the Spirit of God today throughout the world, as God pours out His Spirit in fulfillment of Joel's prophecy, is Heaven's answer to man's spiritual need now at the end of the age.

    The significance of the present-day moving of the Holy Spirit upon believers in all denominations throughout the world may be summarized as (1) God's answer to Jesus' prayer in John 17 "that they may all be one." This is not an organizational oneness promoted by ecclesiastical leaders, but a oneness of love and purpose in the Spirit. Through the experience of the baptism in the Holy Spirit God is gathering the divided, scattered members of His Body, separated by doctrine, traditions, misunderstanding, fear and distrust, and uniting them once more in a bond of love. What the religious leaders are attempting to do by organizational mergers, God is doing by His Holy Spirit. When the Church lost the reality of the experience of the baptism in the Holy Spirit, it lost its one true unifying force, and the Body of Christ, as an inevitable consequence, became divided.

    It is the testimony of those who are receiving the baptism in the Holy Spirit that the immediate effect in their lives is the restoration of a spirit of love and true oneness with all saints everywhere. (2) The present outpouring of the Holy Spirit is also God's answer for the contemporary Laodicean state of the Church, a Church which has the "form of godliness, but denies the power thereof." Where the Holy Spirit has been invited to return, a charismatic revival is taking place—the gifts of the Spirit are being restored (1 Cor. 12), the signs are following the preaching of the Word once again (Mk. 16:17f.), and the supernatural character of the Gospel is once more being demonstrated. (3) The great moving of the Spirit of God over the world in this hour is also God's reply to the great demonic flood sweeping throughout the world in preparation for the reign of Antichrist. We are witnessing a fantastic increase in Satanic wickedness and influence in the form of crime, sexual perversions, suicide, wars, fear, anxiety, divorce, physical and mental illnesses, drug and alcohol addiction, racial strife, hate, deceit, skepticism, and moral decay, as well as the spread of spiritualism and a phenomenal increase in occultism of all forms.

    As the Apostle Paul has shown, the believer's warfare is not against flesh and blood, nor is he contending merely with the secular and materialistic philosophies of our day, but against the spirit of this world (Eph. 6:10f.). This is the precise reason men and their methods of reform have failed and will fail to promote world peace, check the increase in crime and moral decay, or stem the tide of social unrest. The need of the hour is for Christians to experience once more a personal encounter with the Holy Spirit, and to rediscover His blessed ministry in their lives. Only He can bring the believer into a place of total consecration and the deeper life, so that he may be able to overcome the spirit of this age, and withstand in the evil day and, having done all, to stand. Never before in history has the Church needed a baptism of power from on high more than at present, in an age without moral discernment or spiritual authority. Edited. Shared.

    May God grant you a full understanding of His plans and purposes in your life with a sincere desire to please Him in all things.

    Ephesians 5:27. That He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish.

    Lord willing, more will be posted soon. All glory to Jesus alone.
    ❤️A CALL TO GO DEEPER WITH GOD The Nature Of The Deeper Life. What exactly is meant by the Deeper Life in the Spirit? Astonishingly few Christians have the remotest idea, nor is the subject familiar to most of the believers who have received the experience of the baptism in the Holy Spirit. Thousands of believers today are discovering that there is a deeper experience with God after salvation; namely, the baptism in the Holy Spirit, as God in this present hour is pouring out His Spirit upon all flesh as foretold by the Prophet Joel (2:28f.). Countless thousands in all denominations are experiencing the reality of the promise in Acts 2:38-39. However, it comes as a surprise to most of these to learn, after they have received this experience, that they still have not attained God's highest purpose for them, but that the baptism in the Holy Spirit was, in reality, the "means" to a greater spiritual experience—the fullness of God Himself (Eph. 3:19). The deeper life in the Spirit is the Spirit-led life (Rom. 8; Gal. 5:16-25); it is the crucified life (Gal. 2:20); it is a life of total faith in and dependence upon God (Mt. 6:33); and it is the Spirit-filled believer's growth "unto a full-grown man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ" (Eph. 4:13). How is this deeper life in the Spirit to be attained? The message of the deeper life is basically the message of the cross. The way into the deeper life in the Spirit is the way of the cross. It means to take up the cross and follow Jesus. It is, in a word, the death of the self-life. God, in this hour, is calling a people to walk on a higher spiritual level than they have ever experienced before and He is offering them nothing less than the fulness of Himself! The deeper life is walking in the Spirit in total commitment as disciples—the future goal is the fullness of God. More and more disciples who have entered into the glorious experience of the baptism of the Holy Spirit are now being brought by the Spirit into a place of the crucifixion and death of "self" as the essential condition to receiving the fullness of God. To the extent one is filled with "self," he is, of necessity, to that extent not filled with the presence of God. The deeper life in the Spirit is not some mere doctrine to be studied with the intellect, discussed, and then forgotten; but it is a real experience with Christ, as the Holy Spirit brings us into conformity to the death of Christ, so that His resurrection life and power may be manifested fully in us. This is the message of the hour. God is at this very moment preparing a Body of believers which He intends to bring into the fulness of Himself. They will experience the fullness of Christ's resurrection life and power and be used to fulfill His glorious purposes in the restoration of all things now at the consummation of the age (Acts 3:21). For those who are unfamiliar with this great truth we suggest a reading at this point of some of the more significant passages dealing with the deeper life: Matthew 5-7; 20:25-28; Mark 11:22-24; Luke 9:57-62; 14:25f.; Romans 8; 12:1-2; Galatians 2:20; 5:16-25; 6:14; Ephesians 3:1-19; 4:7-16; Philippians 2:5-8; 3:10; Colossians 3: If.; I Peter 2:19-23; 4:1-16; Revelation 2-3. The Need For The Deeper Life. The present age is characterized by two evils affecting both the secular and religious areas of life. One concerns moral discernment; the other involves moral authority. The spiritual and moral character of the present age indicates that conditions have deteriorated to such a point that the only ultimate solution, as well as the greatest need of Christianity at this time, is the restoration of the power and presence of the Holy Spirit in the Church. This is not to be construed to mean some sort of mystical empowering of the present religious institution, whereby its current programs, organization and methods are made more effective, but the need is for a personal encounter with the Holy Spirit by individual Christians in an experience identical with that received by the disciples at Pentecost. To compensate for its lack of power and effectiveness against the present-day flood of wickedness and unbelief, the Church has turned to such substitutes as increased religious activity, new methods and dynamic programs, as well as the merger of denominations in order to multiply its membership and increase its outreach. However sincere the effort may be on the part of some, all such attempts are destined to fail, just as they have in the past; for man cannot restore life to the body by means of artificial respiration when the spirit has departed, "for . . . the body without the spirit is dead" (Jam. 2:26). Only an effusion of power from on high within the lives of Christians themselves can deliver the contemporary Laodicean Church from the moral and spiritual chaos affecting the whole of mankind in this hour. The imperative need of the restoration of the sovereign operation and ministry of the Holy Spirit once more in the Church will be seen, we believe, from the following discussion of the two moral and spiritual characteristics of the age in which we live. It is an age without moral and spiritual discernment. Although the present age has been described by some observers as an age of scientific progress, human achievement, and tremendous advancements into new frontiers of technology, it may, from a moral standpoint at least, be more accurately described as an age of moral and spiritual crisis, reflected in such things as the phenomenal increase in crime, war, and drug addiction, the almost universal preoccupation with sex, the general disregard for authority, the great social upheavals and racial strife, and the almost abysmal lack of moral understanding and concern on every hand. We find ourselves living in an age analogous to the dark ages of the Judges in which "every man did that which was right in his own eyes" (Judg. 21:25). The great apostasy of our day and the perilous times in which we live were foretold by the Apostle Paul as characterizing the last days: This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, truce-breakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof (2 Tim 3:1-5). Truly it is an age when men and women, in many respects, seem to have lost the capacity for moral discernment, calling darkness light and evil good, as was true of Israel in Isaiah's time when he declared, "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter" (Isa. 5:20). As in the period of the Judges, young and old alike consider themselves adequate authorities in spiritual and moral matters, judging what is right and wrong, scorning all attempts at instruction or restraint as outmoded "authoritarianism." The carefree moral philosophy of today is conformity and compromise. It is a time when, even among professing Christians, being "accepted" by the group seems to be more important than being accepted by God. The distinction between the sacred and the secular is rapidly becoming more difficult to discern; there is a loss of a sense of reverence toward God and sacred things; the concept of holiness in the life and character of the Christian is for the most part a thing of the past; and a lack of respect for parents and authority by the younger generation is reflected in a lack of respect for and fear of God. Within Christendom itself the Church and family as the center of interest has been largely replaced with secular interests, and the once quiet Christian home is now monopolized by TV and rock music. Two global conflicts in this century, together with the constant turmoil, world-wide unrest, confusion, and uncertainty about the future have taken their toll, resulting in moral decay, increased drunkenness, divorce, juvenile delinquency and crime, as well as a loss in spiritual concern. Modern scientific achievements and technological improvements have, in spite of their beneficial results, only added to the problem by putting at our disposal hundreds of improvements to save time and make life easier, but providing thereby more time for development of the secular life, leisure, pleasure and sin. It is an age without moral and spiritual authority. The prevailing moral philosophy of this age can be characterized by three words: everything is relative. Morals are relative to time, place, and circumstance. Conduct is largely determined by the principle "when in Rome do as the Romans do." It is an age in which that which is popular and acceptable by the majority is right. The erroneous notion that "the end justifies the means" frequently prevails within, as well as without, the confines of Christendom. "Truth" and "right" are whatever produce results and work; failure is wrong and cannot be tolerated. Conscience is explained as merely the childhood memory of the "do" and "don't" of one's parents; so-called sins are, in reality, "mistakes" or "errors in judgment" in our evolution to a higher morality; and pleasure and happiness, as good ends in themselves, are to be pursued for their own sake. What is responsible for such moral and spiritual confusion? It is because, for the majority at least, there is no longer an objective moral authority to guide their lives and conduct... to teach them truth ... to indicate the difference between right and wrong ... or to establish a standard. In a word, it is because, in this age of materialism and skepticism, men have lost faith in the integrity of the Holy Scriptures, and there remains, therefore, no reliable, unchanging standard of right to measure conduct and character by. Moral conduct is largely determined by the principle of expediency. Without an infallible objective moral standard (the Word of God) the principle of expediency reigns. If it works, if it relieves pain or displeasure, and if it promotes one's welfare and happiness, then it is right. Too often the contemporary Church, denying the inerrancy of Scripture and influenced by the principle of expediency, asks but one question in conducting its affairs, in securing its funds, or in promoting its programs and institutions— "Will it work?" As a result, the Church has, more and more, come to resemble the secular community in which it exists, reflecting its customs, attitudes and mores, rather than being seen as the moral and spiritual influence upon the community. Moreover, it has become increasingly indifferent to the moral declension, decay, and spiritual shallowness within its own confines, and as a consequence, can speak with little moral and spiritual authority to the community at large. What is the solution in an age without spiritual discernment and authority for those who, possessing a measure of spiritual awareness and concern, desire to walk in the ways of truth and faithfulness? God Himself has provided the answer to the dilemma, enabling, thereby, the sincere Christian to rediscover the distinctiveness of his calling to be the "salt of the earth" and "light of the world." The present move of the Spirit of God today throughout the world, as God pours out His Spirit in fulfillment of Joel's prophecy, is Heaven's answer to man's spiritual need now at the end of the age. The significance of the present-day moving of the Holy Spirit upon believers in all denominations throughout the world may be summarized as (1) God's answer to Jesus' prayer in John 17 "that they may all be one." This is not an organizational oneness promoted by ecclesiastical leaders, but a oneness of love and purpose in the Spirit. Through the experience of the baptism in the Holy Spirit God is gathering the divided, scattered members of His Body, separated by doctrine, traditions, misunderstanding, fear and distrust, and uniting them once more in a bond of love. What the religious leaders are attempting to do by organizational mergers, God is doing by His Holy Spirit. When the Church lost the reality of the experience of the baptism in the Holy Spirit, it lost its one true unifying force, and the Body of Christ, as an inevitable consequence, became divided. It is the testimony of those who are receiving the baptism in the Holy Spirit that the immediate effect in their lives is the restoration of a spirit of love and true oneness with all saints everywhere. (2) The present outpouring of the Holy Spirit is also God's answer for the contemporary Laodicean state of the Church, a Church which has the "form of godliness, but denies the power thereof." Where the Holy Spirit has been invited to return, a charismatic revival is taking place—the gifts of the Spirit are being restored (1 Cor. 12), the signs are following the preaching of the Word once again (Mk. 16:17f.), and the supernatural character of the Gospel is once more being demonstrated. (3) The great moving of the Spirit of God over the world in this hour is also God's reply to the great demonic flood sweeping throughout the world in preparation for the reign of Antichrist. We are witnessing a fantastic increase in Satanic wickedness and influence in the form of crime, sexual perversions, suicide, wars, fear, anxiety, divorce, physical and mental illnesses, drug and alcohol addiction, racial strife, hate, deceit, skepticism, and moral decay, as well as the spread of spiritualism and a phenomenal increase in occultism of all forms. As the Apostle Paul has shown, the believer's warfare is not against flesh and blood, nor is he contending merely with the secular and materialistic philosophies of our day, but against the spirit of this world (Eph. 6:10f.). This is the precise reason men and their methods of reform have failed and will fail to promote world peace, check the increase in crime and moral decay, or stem the tide of social unrest. The need of the hour is for Christians to experience once more a personal encounter with the Holy Spirit, and to rediscover His blessed ministry in their lives. Only He can bring the believer into a place of total consecration and the deeper life, so that he may be able to overcome the spirit of this age, and withstand in the evil day and, having done all, to stand. Never before in history has the Church needed a baptism of power from on high more than at present, in an age without moral discernment or spiritual authority. Edited. Shared. May God grant you a full understanding of His plans and purposes in your life with a sincere desire to please Him in all things. Ephesians 5:27. That He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish. ❤️ Lord willing, more will be posted soon. All glory to Jesus alone.
    Like
    Love
    11
    1 Commenti 1 condivisioni 1146 Views
Pagine in Evidenza