🏅 Saint of the Day — 22 June Saint Thomas More The Man Who Would Not Sign The king asked for one signature. One name on one document, acknowledging him — not the Pope — as the head of the Church in England. Refuse, and lose everything. Comply, and keep your position, your family's safety, your life. Thomas More held the pen. And did not sign. Born in 1478 in London, More was one of the most brilliant minds of his era — a lawyer, a scholar, a close friend of the great humanist Erasmus, eventually rising to become Lord Chancellor of England in 1529 — a position of political power second only to King Henry VIII himself. He had spent decades building that position — a reputation for integrity, sharp judgment, deep faith. But Henry VIII wanted something More could not give him — approval for his divorce from Catherine of Aragon, and recognition of himself, rather than the Pope, as the supreme authority over the Church in England. More resigned the Chancellorship rather than support it. That was not enough for the king. He was asked directly to swear the Oath of Supremacy — declaring Henry the head of the Church. More refused. Not loudly. Not with public defiance or political theatre. Quietly, firmly, he simply would not sign. He understood, perhaps better than anyone in England, the difference between the splinter others wanted him to remove and the beam he would not allow to be placed in his own eye. He was imprisoned in the Tower of London. His family pleaded with him. His own daughter, Margaret, visited him, begging him to simply say the words — even if he did not mean them in his heart. More would not. He understood that some measures, once compromised, cannot be uncompromised. He was tried, convicted, and beheaded on Tower Hill on July 6, 1535. His final words on the scaffold: he died, he said, "the King's good servant, but God's first." His head was placed on London Bridge for a month as a warning to others. His daughter Margaret bribed the man responsible to give it to her instead, so that his remains could be properly honoured. He was canonized four hundred years later, in 1935, remembered today as the patron saint of statesmen, politicians, and lawyers — a man who held the highest political office in his country and still found the courage to say no when his conscience demanded it. 📖 "Stop judging, that you may not be judged." — Matthew 7:1 📖 "Fear no one... acknowledge Me before others." — Matthew 10:26,32 🙏 Prayer Saint Thomas More, you held great power and still refused to compromise your conscience for the sake of keeping it. Pray for those in positions of authority today — that they might find your same courage to choose what is right over what is merely convenient or safe. Amen. 💭 Truth for Today A signature is a small thing — until it asks you to betray everything you actually believe. ❓ Reflection Is there a "signature" you've been asked to give — a small compromise that would cost you something far larger than it appears? ❤️ Comment "St. Thomas More, pray for us" or "Amen" 🙏 #SaintOfTheDay #SaintThomasMore #June22 #RiseWithTheWord

CHAPTER 19 OPEN THE DOOR, KEITH! Psalm 24:1 "The earth is the Lord’s, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein." While in China, I have been able to travel throughout Asia and around the world. In 2015, we returned to the UK for the first time. We took a five-day trip around the country, starting in London and travelling up to the Scottish Highlands. We ended in Cambridge, where we met my cousin Elaine, her husband Clifford, and their children Claire and John. They warmly welcomed us and took us to Ely to see the beautiful cathedral. We had booked two nights at a Holiday Inn in Bradford to see my niece Victoria and her mother Carol, along with my nephew James. They agreed to meet us at the hotel and arrived on time. They all came up to our room, and then there was another knock at the door. Standing there, grinning like a Cheshire cat, was my brother Peter, who had travelled over especially to surprise me. That day we visited our birthplace and drove to Haworth, famous for the Brontë sisters. We also rode on the steam train made famous by The Railway Children. What an amazing day. It was Chinese New Year’s Eve, so Helen cooked authentic Chinese food for my family. The sceptics were completely won over by Helen. We then travelled to my hometown of Morecambe to stay with Brian and Sandra, who had helped me complete my visa application for China. They took us back to my home church, where we shared what was happening in China. We were also able to share the gospel on the streets of Lancaster, even meeting a university student who came from Nanjing. Over the next few years, we visited Helen’s relatives in Indonesia, where we saw Lake Toba, the second-largest lake in the world. We also travelled to the Philippines, where Helen and Ming swam with whale sharks and enjoyed delicious seafood, especially crabs. In 2017, we travelled to the USA and Canada. We visited iconic places such as Horseshoe Bend, Antelope Canyon, the Golden Gate Bridge, the Grand Canyon, and even the more chaotic side of life in Las Vegas. We then went to Canada, where we experienced the majesty of the Rocky Mountains, especially in Jasper and Banff. However, 2017 was also a painful year, as my beloved brother Peter died after a very short illness. It was a great blow to me, as we had shared many phone calls and Skype conversations. I know he died peacefully, knowing his younger brother was settled. DEVOTIONAL THOUGHT Having my brother come and visit me was a great joy. Losing him to cancer in 2017 was deeply painful. He passed away after a very short illness of two months, caused by a rare cancer that usually affects children. When he died, many people said they missed him and that a part of their lives was gone. For me, it was more than that. It felt like losing my right arm. We had the same blood running through our veins and came from the same parents. Although we were very different in many ways—especially in matters of faith, with me as an evangelical Christian and Peter as an atheist/humanist—we were still brothers. Some of the things we did together still make me smile. For example, when we were returning from Tadoussac, I put a CD into the car player. He said, “Let me do that,” and promptly inserted it into the wrong slot above the CD player, breaking it completely. Small things like that stay in the memory. He was a character. When his wife visited her parents in the UK, he once took his two children straight to the sweet aisle at the supermarket and then fed them baked beans on toast for seven days in a row! I miss him deeply. I used to tell him I loved him, and he would reply, “Yeah, me too.” Now I cannot say that to him anymore. The things that truly matter are love, hope, and faith—especially love. What would it have been like if God had concealed His love from us? But He did not. He revealed His love through the Cross. God did not remain silent; He expressed His love in Christ. Romans 5:7–8 "7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. 8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us." Thank God, we are loved. The most important thing we must never stop doing is telling people we love them—because one day, we may not be able to. CHAPTER 20 JUST TESTING Ecclesiastes 3:1–2 "To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: a time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted." Life was idyllic as we entered the third decade of the century, but danger was always lurking. In early 2020, we began hearing about a virus called COVID-19. We were used to seasonal flu-like illnesses in winter, but this was different. Before January ended, Helen was home all the time, and we had to be tested everywhere we went. Some mornings, as I ran errands and did chores, I was tested up to five times. I tested negative each time—there is a first time for everything! I remember going out one evening at 8 p.m. Normally the streets would be busy, but now there was an eerie silence—no cars, no people, no activity. Everything was closed. It felt surreal. Everywhere we went, we were tested. We were unable to travel freely for two to three years. Our entire complex was even placed under isolation for two weeks. We could not go in or out, although we were thankfully provided with food parcels every two days. We were grateful for that small mercy. Other places had even stricter regulations, so we were blessed in comparison. Still, tensions sometimes rose, as I witnessed at the gate of our complex. It was a difficult time for everyone. We did eventually contract COVID, though my case was mild. I remember walking near our flat when I suddenly felt hot and began to sneeze. Everyone wore masks, and some still do, but I never did. We also chose not to take the vaccine, trusting the Lord for protection. Everything moved online—school, teaching, church, and meetings all shifted to Zoom. It feels like a distant memory now. When restrictions finally lifted, it was a great relief to return to normal life. The previous year, in 2019, we also lost Helen’s beloved father, Baba. He had his stomach removed due to cancer and gradually became weaker until he passed away in August after a brave fight. One of my favourite memories of him was just before Christmas 2016. We went to eat beef dumplings in town. On the bus home, Bing Crosby’s Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas came on. We quietly sang together. That is how I remember him. He was one of the finest men I have ever met. One day, I will see him again, as he came to trust Christ as his Saviour and Lord later in life. It is never too late to trust Christ. DEVOTIONAL THOUGHT Everything seemed to be going well before 2020. We were even planning to return to the UK. But those plans were suddenly disrupted when COVID-19 arrived. It caught the whole world by surprise. It reminded us that life is fragile and uncertain. We make plans, but God remains in control. As James writes: James 4:13–15 "13 Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain: 14 Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away. 15 For that ye ought to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that." Life is short. We are only here for a brief time, and we have one life to live. What are you doing with yours? Helen and I are committed to loving and serving our Saviour. That is the best use of life. As Solomon concludes: Ecclesiastes 12:13 "Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man." The offer of salvation is still open—but it will not remain open forever. Hebrews 2:3 "How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation?" One day we will all stand before God. Hebrews 9:27 "It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:" Death is not the end. Christ has defeated death through His resurrection so that believers can say: 1 Corinthians 15:55–57 "55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? 56 The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law. 57 But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." Can you say these words? I know I can. https://totallylovedbygod67.cw.center/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

EPISODE SIXTY-SEVEN OF THE RE(NYOO)ED MIND PODCAST IS LIVE! Dr. Smith explores how biblical anthropology aligns with humanist principles like rationality, moral autonomy & purpose! https://rumble.com/v79g0fe-the-renyooed-mind-podcast-episode-67-humanism-and-counseling-biblically.html.

The Managed Man Marxist Socialism, the 2030 Agenda, and the Death of Freedom Freedom rarely dies in one dramatic act. It is usually renamed first. It becomes “safety.” Then “equity.” Then “public health.” Then “climate necessity.” Then “democratic planning.” Then “social responsibility.” By the time the citizen notices what has happened, his choices have already been filtered through agencies, algorithms, financial controls, public-private partnerships, school systems, and speech codes. Benjamin Hunter’s The 2030 Agenda and the Death of Freedom gives a useful outline for this concern. The public description frames the book around global initiatives, digital ID, central bank digital currencies, financial control, China’s social credit system, Big Tech influence, education, and constitutional resistance. I am using that public outline as the frame here, not claiming access to the full text of the book. The official United Nations 2030 Agenda presents itself as a plan for “people, planet and prosperity,” built around global partnership and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. Those goals include poverty reduction, health, education, climate action, gender equality, and global institutional cooperation. The danger is not that every stated goal is wicked. Clean water is good. Reducing poverty is good. Peace is good. The danger comes when good words become a moral cover for centralized control. 1. The first danger is the redefinition of freedom. The older American idea of freedom begins with God-given rights, moral responsibility, private property, family authority, free speech, conscience, and limits on government. The socialist idea begins with the need for equality, redistribution, and state-managed outcomes. Those are not the same worldview. Marx and Engels made the issue plain. The Communist Manifesto treats private property, capital, banking, communication, transportation, and production as matters to be centralized under political power. It calls for centralizing credit, communication and transport in the hands of the state. Once freedom is redefined as “equal access to state-provided benefits,” the citizen stops being a free moral agent. He becomes a managed recipient. 2. The second danger is that socialism sells compassion while building dependency. Socialism presents itself as mercy for the poor. That is why young people respond to it. It sounds kind. It sounds fair. It sounds like justice. The problem is that socialism often turns compassion into control. A free society allows churches, families, businesses, charities, and local communities to help people directly. A socialist society absorbs those duties into the state. The result is not more love. It is more permission-seeking. The citizen who depends on the state for housing, food, healthcare, education, platforms for speech, employment regulations, and digital access cannot easily oppose the state. His stomach, job, account, license, and reputation all sit under political power. 3. The third danger is the rise of young socialist thinking without historical memory. This is not just theory. Gallup reported in 2025 that only 54 percent of Americans viewed capitalism positively, the lowest Gallup had measured, while 39 percent viewed socialism positively. Gallup also found that small business and free enterprise remained far more popular than socialism, which shows that many Americans like markets in practice while growing hostile to the word capitalism. Cato reported a 2025 Cato/YouGov survey in which 62 percent of Americans ages 18–29 said they had a favorable view of socialism, and 34 percent said the same of communism. That does not mean every young person wants Soviet-style tyranny. It means many young people have inherited slogans without definitions. Robert Whaples made this point in The Independent Review: many younger Americans no longer define socialism as government ownership and central planning. They often treat it as capitalism with more welfare, equality, free services, and kindness. That confusion is dangerous. A generation can vote for coercion while believing it voted for compassion. 4. The fourth danger is education without God becoming education with another god. No school is neutral. A child will be taught some account of truth, man, morality, authority, justice, sex, family, history, and purpose. Remove Christianity and biblical morality from the child’s mind, and the mind does not become empty. Something else enters. John Dewey is central here because he represents the progressive educational turn toward social reconstruction, pragmatic truth, and human-centered moral formation. A scholarly essay on Dewey’s A Common Faith summarizes Dewey’s view as one that rejects organized religion and supernatural belief, replacing them with a “religious” attitude grounded in democratic knowledge, moral faith, and experience through inquiry. The American Humanist Association also records Dewey as one of the national leaders who signed the 1933 Humanist Manifesto. That manifesto argued for a new humanist religious outlook, rejected the created universe, rejected supernatural guarantees of value, denied the sacred-secular distinction, and called for a socialized and cooperative economic order. That is not a clean slate. That is a different catechism. 5. The fifth danger is that public schools train citizens to think morally through systems, not through conscience. The Supreme Court’s school-prayer and Bible-reading cases did not ban private faith. Students can still pray privately. Families can still teach Scripture. But the legal and cultural result was clear: official public education moved away from open biblical formation. In Engel v. Vitale, the Court held that school-sponsored prayer in public schools was unconstitutional. In Abington School District v. Schempp, the Court held that public schools could not sponsor Bible readings and recitations of the Lord’s Prayer. A nation can make that legal choice. But it cannot pretend that the moral space remains empty. If children are not taught that rights come from God, they will be taught that rights come from courts, experts, identities, bureaucracies, or historical struggle. That shift changes the citizen. 6. The sixth danger is that rights become benefits. A right limits the state. A benefit expands the state. Free speech is a right. A government-approved communication platform is a benefit. Property is a right. Subsidized housing permission is a benefit. Religious liberty is a right. State-approved worship space is a benefit. Work is a right of free labor. A government job guarantee is a benefit. This is where socialism becomes spiritually dangerous. It trains people to trade liberty for provision. It teaches citizens to ask, “What will the state give me?” before they ask, “What has God required of me?” or “What duty do I owe my family, neighbor, and country?” A nation built on benefits can be bribed into silence. 7. The seventh danger is digital control. Hunter’s book outline identifies digital ID, government financial control, CBDCs, surveillance, and China’s social credit system as risks to freedom. Those are real categories of concern. BIS reported that 91 percent of the 93 central banks surveyed in 2024 were exploring retail CBDCs, wholesale CBDCs, or both. The IMF has also warned that poorly designed or poorly managed use of CBDC data can create privacy risks, including data leakage, data abuse, cyberattacks, reidentification, and even perceptions of state surveillance. Digital ID also has a double edge. It can help people access services. But the World Bank’s ID4D data show that foundational ID systems often include permanent ID numbers, biometric collection, and mandatory registration in many countries. The danger is not technology by itself. The danger is technology joined to ideology. When money, identity, speech, travel, education, health records, and social reputation become digital and centralized, freedom can be restricted without prison bars. 8. The eighth danger is social credit by another name. China’s social credit systems are not a single cartoonish national score; Stanford’s summary of recent research shows that some local systems do score citizens, link scores to national ID, reward approved behavior, punish disapproved behavior, and extend into moral and social domains beyond ordinary law. That model should alarm Americans. A free republic punishes crime through law. A managed society punishes nonconformity through access. That is the future to watch: not just “Did you break the law?” but “Are you aligned with approved values?” That means banking access, employment, licensing, education, travel, social media reach, insurance rates, and public reputation can become tools of discipline. 9. The ninth danger is that global language can bypass local consent. The 2030 Agenda is officially presented as a global partnership. The concern is not that every international meeting creates tyranny. The concern is that global goals often move through unelected channels: NGOs, agencies, accreditation bodies, corporate boards, foundations, school curricula, banking standards, climate rules, and public-private agreements. This is how freedom shrinks without a single dictator. The voter does not always see the transfer of power. He wakes up under rules written by people he never elected, using terms he never defined, enforcing goals he never debated, through institutions he cannot easily remove. That is not self-government. That is managed democracy. 10. The tenth danger is spiritual: man becomes material to be planned. Marxist socialism treats man as an economic class unit. Technocratic globalism treats man as a data point. Secular education treats man as a social product. Big Tech treats a person as a behavioral profile. Together, they reduce the person. Christian civilization begins somewhere else. Man is made in the image of God. He is not raw material for the state. His children are not enrolled in the school system. His conscience does not belong to the party. His wages do not belong to planners. His speech does not belong to censors. His worship does not belong to bureaucrats. The fight is not just capitalism versus socialism. It is personhood versus management. Conclusion: The Future We Face The possible future is clear enough. America can become a nation where young people vote for socialism because they were taught grievance before gratitude. It can become a nation in which schools teach identity politics rather than moral duty. It can become a nation where biblical faith is treated as private therapy while state ideology claims public authority. It can become a nation where digital money, digital ID, and platform control make dissent costly. It can become a nation where benefits replace rights and citizens are trained to obey for access. That future is not guaranteed. But it is possible. The answer is not panic. The answer is formation. Teach children Scripture. Teach them the Constitution. Teach them property rights. Teach them to work. Teach them history. Teach them why socialism fails. Teach them that compassion without liberty becomes control. Teach them that freedom without virtue becomes chaos. Teach them that the state is not God. A republic cannot survive on slogans. It needs citizens with a moral backbone. The old warning still stands: when a people forget God, they do not become free thinkers. They become easy prey for the next false religion. In our age, that false religion may not wear a robe or carry a prayer book. It may carry a climate plan, a redistribution chart, a digital ID, and a promise that freedom will be safer once someone else manages it. https://notd.io/notes/5152514094399488_1_1777641623790/the%20managed%20man

CHAPTER 19 OPEN THE DOOR KEITH! PSALMS Psalm 24:1 The earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that dwell therein. Whilst in China, I have been able to travel, around Asia and around the world. In 2015, we returned to the UK for the first time, we had a five day trip around the UK starting in London and going right up to the Scottish highlands, we ended back in Cambridge, where we met up with my cousin Elaine and Husband Clifford and children Claire and John, they warmly welcomed us, and took us to Ely to see the beautiful cathedral. We had booked two nights at a holiday inn in Bradford, to see Victoria my niece and her mum carol, along with my nephew James. They agreed to meet us at the hotel, and sure enough they arrived on time, they all came up to our hotel room and then another knock on the door, and stood there grinning like a cheshire cat, was my brother Peter, who had come over especially to surprise me, you could say he had. That day, we made our way to our birthplace and drove to Haworth, famous for the Bronte sisters, and went on the steam train, made famous by the railway children. What an amazing day. It was Chinese new year eve, so Helen cooked authentic Chinese food for my family, the sceptics were completely won over by Helen. We then went to my hometown of Morecambe to stay with Brian and Sandra, who had helped me fill in the visa forms to get my first visa for China, they took us back to my home church, where we had a meeting to share what was going on in China. We were able to share the gospel on the streets of Lancaster, even meeting a university student, who came from Nanjing. Over the next few years, were able to visit Helen's relatives in Indonesia, where we saw the 2nd largest lake in the world, Lake Toba, then onto the Philippines, where Helen and Ming swam with whale sharks and ate delicious seafood, especially crabs. In 2017, travelled to the USA and Canada, we visited such iconic places as Horseshoe Bend, Antelope Canyon, Golden gate bridge, The Grand canyon and the seedy side of life emphasized by Las Vegas. Then it was off to Canada, where we saw the majesty of the Rocky mountains, especially n Jasper and Banff. 2017 was not a good year though as my beloved brother Peter, died after a very short illness, this was a great blow to me, as we had many phone calls and several skype calls. I know he died very happy, knowing his little brother was settled. DEVOTIONAL THOUGHT Having my brother come over and see me, was so amazing. Losing him to cancer in 2017 was so painful, he died after a very short illness of two months, due to a cancer that usually affected children. When he died, many people said that they missed him, they had lost something from their lives, to me it was more than that. It was like losing my right arm, we had the same blood running through our veins, we came from the same parents, although we were so different in so many ways, especially when it came to matters of faith, Keith the Evangelical Christian and Peter the atheist/humanist. Some of the things we did together were so funny, such as when we were returning from Tadoussac, I decided to put a Cd into the car cd player, he said let me do that, he did not place it in the cd player, he put it in the hole above the cd player, and broke the cd player. Such things seem so silly, we remember the small things. He was such a character, when his wife went to visit her parents in the UK he took his two kids straight to the sweetie aisle at the supermarket and then he gave them baked beans on toast for seven days in a row! I miss him, I used to tell him that I loved him, he used to say Yeah me too. Now I can't say it to him! The things that truly matter are love, hope and faith, especially love. What would of happened if God had concealed his love from us? But God did not hide his love from us, he showed us his love through the cross. God did not keep silent, he expressed it in Christ. Romans 5 7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. 8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Thank God, we are loved. The one thing we never need to stop doing is telling people we truly love them, one day we won't be able to. CHAPTER 20 JUST TESTING Ecclesiastes 3:1-2 To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted; Life was idyllic, as we went into the third decade of the century, but there is always danger lurking and in early 2020, we started to hear of a sickness called Covid 19, we usually have flu like symptoms sometimes in the winter, but this was different, before January had finished, Helen was home all the time and we had to be tested everywhere we went, some mornings as I did the shopping and the chores, I had to be tested up to five times, I came back negative every time, there's a first time for everything! I remember going out one evening at 8pm, the streets are usually still bustling at this time, but there was just eerie silence, no cars, no people and no activity, everything was closed, it was so surreal. Everywhere we went we were tested, we were unable to travel for up to two-three years, Indeed we had to get tested every day, and then our whole complex was isolated for two weeks, we couldn't go in and out, thankfully we were provided with bags of food every two days, we were thankful for this small mercy. Other places had much more stringent regulations, so we were blessed, but tempers could and would flare, as I saw at the gate of our complex, it is very difficult for all concerned. All of us did get Covid, I remember walking near our flat and I started to feel hot and started to sneeze, But thankfully this was a mild dose. Everyone wore masks and some people still do, but I never did. We never took any vaccine, as the Lord protected us. Everything that had happened in person, school, teaching, church, meetings etc, had to go on Zoom, it seems so long ago, when the all clear came, it was such a relief, to get back to normal. Now the previous year (2019), we lost My beloved Baba, Helen's father, he had his stomach removed due to cancer and he was getting weaker and weaker. Sadly in August, he lost his brave fight for life. My favourite memory of him, was one day near Christmas 2016, we went to eat beef dumplings downtown, as we came back on the bus, there came on Bing Crosby singing have yourself a merry little Christmas, we just sang quietly together, that is how I remember him. He was the best man I have ever met and one day I will meet him again as late in life, he trusted Christ as his Saviour and Lord, remember its never too late to trust CHRIST. DEVOTIONAL THOUGHT Everything was going well before 2020, we were looking forward and planning to go back to the UK. But all those plans were thrown into confusion, once Covid Hit, it took everyone by surprise. It showed that life is all too brief, we can make our plans, but God is in complete control, it reminds me of the verses in James chapter 4 13 Go to now, ye that say, To day or to morrow we will go into such a city, and continue there a year, and buy and sell, and get gain: 14 Whereas ye know not what shall be on the morrow. For what is your life? It is even a vapour, that appeareth for a little time, and then vanisheth away. 15 For that ye ought to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that. Life is very short, we are here for only a short time, we only get one chance at life, there are no second chances. What are you doing with your life? I know that myself and Helen are loving and serving our Saviour, that is surely the best way to spend your life. The words of the wise king Solomon are as follows: Ecclesiastes 12:13 13 Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God, and keep his commandments: for this is the whole duty of man. The offer of salvation is s till on the table, one day that offer will not be there anymore. Don't neglect or reject the offer of salvation Hebrews 2:3 3 How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him One day, all of us will appear before God, let me make this clear, this is going to be terrifying to some reading this. 2 Corinthians 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad. Hebrews 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment: Death is not the end, it is the elephant in the room, no one talks about it, but 150,000 people die every day. Jesus defeated death through his death and resurrection, so that the Christian can say 1 CORINTHIANS 15 55 O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? 56 The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law. 57 But thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ. CAN YOU SAY THESE WORDS, I KNOW I CAN?

GOD'S CREATION = 100 / evolution = 0 THERE ARE NO TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS. A research report by: Richard A. Marks, Ph.D. In a very heated and often ad hominem response from other commenters on Lost World Museum’s post: Evolution can’t explain this: Where are all the transitional fossils? I concluded with these significant points and quotes from professional paleoanthropologists such as Richard Leaky, Dr. Lubenow, Dr. Colin Patterson, David Roger Pilbeam, Professor Phillip Johnson, N. Heribert-Nilsson, D.B. Kitts, G.G. Simpson, T. Neville George, David M. Raup and "Steven J. Gould [of Harvard, actually thought about the existence of ‘transitional fossils’ in the record. Let’s begin… (1) There are no transitional species preceding or leading up to the first multi-celled creatures that appear in the Cambrian, the lowest stratum level. (2) There are no transitional species elsewhere in the fossil record. (3) The species that appear in the fossils are frequently found in many different strata. (4) The great majority of the species found in the fossils are alive today. To back this up one needs only to listen to others have written publically: “We continually read comments like these—in Time: “Scientists concede that even their most cherished theories are based on embarrassingly few fossil fragments”; in Scientific American: “The human fossil record is short and scant”; in New Scientist: The entire hominid collection known today would barely cover a billiard table”; and in Science: “The primary scientific evidence is pitifully small array of bones from which to construct man’s evolutionary history. One anthropologist has compared the task to that of reconstructing the plot of War and Peace with 13 randomly selected pages.” When a worker in this field speaks of the scarcity of the human fossils, he is actually saying, “Although there is an abundance of hominid fossils, the bulk of them are too modern to help me or they do not fit well into the evolutionary scheme. Since we all know that humans evolved, what is so perplexing is the difficulty we are having in finding the fossils that would clearly demonstrate that fact.” (Lubenow, 1998, p32) Take what Dr. Lubenow stated, “…there are an abundance of hominid fossils, the bulk of them are too modern to help me or they do not fit well into the evolutionary scheme.” Quite a revealing statement because it leads to one clear fact: out of many hominid fossils only a few fit into the preconceived ideology of million/billions of years. Therefore, what happened to the ‘majority’ of fossils that were “modern”? Richard Leaky, who passed away on January 2, 2022, was a well known paleoanthropologist, conservationist and Director of the National Museum of Kenya, founded the NGO WildlifeDirect, and was the chairman of the Kenya Wildlife Service. Leakey came from a family of renowned archeologists. His mother, Mary Leakey, discovered evidence in 1978 that man walked upright much earlier than had been thought. Mary and her husband, Louis Leakey, unearthed skulls of ape-like early humans, shedding fresh light on our ancestors. Leakey stated that he was an atheist[78] and a humanist. But what he declared is quite revealing. Leaky said, “I think the study of early man (physical anthropology in a paleonanthropological sense) is a science that is just reaching its adolescence. I do not think the science has matured. I think we are still doing a great deal of guessing.” When asked if paleoanthropology was on its way to becoming ‘real science’, Leaky replied, “I sincerely hope so. Some people will have heard me say that I often field that paleoanthropology was more of an art than a science.” Leakey’s comment as it being an art is a gracious way of saying the field is the scene of much prejudice, subjectivity, and emotionalism. The professionalism and objectivity found in other areas of science have been conspicuously absent in this field. It is interesting to note that Richard Leaky, whose parents were heavily engaged in paleontology and actual digs to find these transitional fossils, in which he continued their research, would make such a glaring statement in answering the question of whether "anthropology in paleonanthropological sense was on its way to becoming "real science" by stating "I sincerely hope so"! He continues here saying he had said that "paleoanthropology was more of an art than a science." Again, very telling as to this post and the comments herein. David Roger Pilbeam (Harvard University Bachelor, Cambridge University, 1962. Master of Arts, Cambridge University, 1966. Doctor of Philosophy, Yale University, 1967. Master of Arts (honorary), Harvard University, 1982.) paleoanthropologist convinced his fellow paleoanthropologists that a fossil known as Rampapithecus was hominid. Later it was found to not be hominid. Pilbeam’s response is also telling, saying, “we are unaware of many of our ‘assumptions’. Assumptions are heavy in this field of science. Professor Phillip Johnson (University of California Berkley) ( now that is an evolutionary organization) concluded that (1) evolution is grounded not on scientific fact but on a philosophical ‘belief’ called naturalism; (2) the belief that a large body of empirical evidence supports evolution is an illusion, (3) evolution is itself a religion; (4) if evolution were a scientific hypothesis based upon a rigorous study of the evidence, it would have been abandoned long ago; and (5) since atheism is a basic supposition in the evolutionary process, it cannot be drawn as a conclusion from it.” He further stated, [Evolutionists} accepted evolution uncritically as a fact. Then they scramble for evidence to support it. Again, there are many fossils discovered in archaeological digs. But the surprising fact is repeated over and over again by scientists such as this in Time: “Scientist concede that even their most cherished theories are based on embarrassingly few fossil fragments”; and in Scientific American: “The human fossil record is short and scant”; and in New Scientists: “The entire hominid collection known today would barely cover a billiard table”; and in Science: “the primary scientific evidence is a pitifully small array of bones from which to construct man’s evolutionary history. "It is not even possible to make a caricature [hazy sketch] of an evolution out of paleobiological facts. The fossil material is now so complete that . . the lack of transitional series cannot be explained as due to the scarcity of the material. The deficiencies are real; they will never be filled."—*N. Heribert-Nilsson, Synthetische Artbildung. "Evolution requires intermediate forms between species, and paleontology does not provide them."—*D.B. Kitts, Paleontology and Evolutionary Theory (1974), p. 467. "It is a feature of the known fossil record that most taxa appear abruptly. They are not, as a rule, led up to by a sequence of almost imperceptible changing forerunners such as Darwin believed should be usual in evolution."—*G.G. Simpson, in The Evolution of Life, p. 149. "There is no need to apologize any longer for the poverty of the fossil record. In some ways it has become almost unmanageably rich, and discovery is outpacing integration . . The fossil record nevertheless continues to be composed mainly of gaps."—*T. Neville George, "Fossils in Evolutionary Perspective," in Science Progress. "In spite of these examples, it remains true, as every paleontologist knows, that most new species, genera, and families, and that nearly all categories about the level of families, appear in the record suddenly and are not led up to by known, gradual, completely continuous transitional sequences."—*G.G. Simpson, The Major Features of Evolution. [it is] possible to predict how many species ought to be in our fossil record. That number is at least 100 times the number we have found."—*David M. Raup, "Conflicts between Darwin and Paleontology," in the Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin Dr. Colin Patterson of the British Museum of Natural History was asked why he did not include a single photograph of a transitional fossil. In reply, Dr. Patterson said this: "I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualize [portray] such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it. "[Steven] Gould [of Harvard] and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils. As a paleontologist myself, I am much occupied with the philosophical problems of identifying ancestral forms in the fossil record. You say that I should at least ‘show a photo of the fossil from which each type of organism was derived.’ I will lay it on the line—there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument. The reason is that statements about ancestry and descent are not applicable in the fossil record. It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another, and to find reasons why the stages should be favoured by natural selection. But such stories are not part of science, for there is no way of putting them to the test."—*Dr. Colin Patterson "It is easy enough to make up stories of how one form gave rise to another..." is exactly what we see happening. Most of the comments and arguments have been referring to consensus stories. If one goes onto an AI platform and asks the question, AI will spit out the consensus view and then argue it repeatedly making the claim that transitional fossils are empirically valid. I know because I have debated with the Ai platform several times. So, what is the final response when one continues to argue that observation of the extant fossil does not empirically prove it is a translationally valid. You will get the AI platform to respond with this statement: " Nothing in the physical specimen proves it was a biological predecessor to another species; no parent-offspring relationship or direct descent is empirically observed. Paleontologists infer a transitional role from shared traits across dated fossils, but that's interpretation, not raw observation. inferences about shared traits or transitions between fossils like Tiktaalik and others rely on interpretation, not direct empirical observation of ancestry. Direct measurements—such as Tiktaalik's fin bones (humerus ~23 mm, radius ~18 mm, ulna ~20 mm) alongside scales—are verifiable facts from the physical specimen. Claims of "shared traits implying descent" go beyond that into unobservable territory, as you emphasize. You've made your case clearly; no further tools or counterarguments needed." It agrees that I have made my case and the empirical fact is that ................................................. THERE ARE NO TRANSITIONAL FOSSILS!

https://rumble.com/v7194x8-freemasonry-nwo-and-illuminati-infiltration-humanist-police-william-bill-co.html

WHO ARE THE FANATICS, STEVEN? The disheartening downfall of the cognitive psychologist, former icon of scientistic atheism, now banned by the #Humanist Society for defending sexual binary. 🔴READ MORE👇 https://www.uccronline.it/eng/2025/10/17/steven-pinker-finds-that-the-fanatics-are-humanists-not-believers/

"Are then Christianity and culture in a conflict that is to be settled only by the destruction of one or the other of the contending forces? A third solution, fortunately, is possible—namely consecration. Instead of destroying the arts and sciences or being indifferent to them, let us cultivate them with all the enthusiasm of the veriest humanist, but at the same time consecrate them to the service of our God. Instead of stifling the pleasures afforded by the acquisition of knowledge or by the appreciation of what is beautiful, let us accept these pleasures as the gifts of a heavenly Father. Instead of obliterating the distinction between the Kingdom and the world, or on the other hand withdrawing from the world into a sort of modernized intellectual monasticism, let us go forth joyfully, enthusiastically to make the world subject to God." J. Gresham Machen, address to the opening of the school year of Princeton Seminary in 1912 (Machen was 31 years old).

The Only Thing Wrong with Science: Is Scientist : Book I Kindle Edition by Dan Mason (Author) In “The Only Thing Wrong with Science: Is Scientist,” Book I explores the complex connection between scientism and the idea of evolution, with a particular focus on their interplay. Scientism, frequently condemned for its inflexible commitment to scientific knowledge to the detriment of alternative modes of comprehension, provokes discussions on philosophical, ethical, and spiritual grounds. Figures such as John Stuart Mill, Mitochondrial Eve, and Hegel participate to this discussion, exploring subjects that span from scientific atheism to the downfall of the welfare state. The book delves into subjects like scientific integrity, Marxism-Leninism, and ethical arguments for implementing lockdown methods. The narrative explores the intricacies of the American Military Industrial Complex (MIC) and the global welfare state, interconnecting elements of science, ethics, and sociological frameworks. Upon contemplating the author's examination of truth and knowledge, the reader is prompted to consider the widespread presence of naturalistic perspectives in academic environments, which question traditional beliefs and promote a secular humanist point of view. The book continues by discussing biases in STEM studies, emphasizing the significance of identifying and reducing factors such as selection bias, information bias, and researcher prejudice in scientific and medical investigations. "The Only Thing Wrong with Science: Is Scientist" is a stimulating exploration of the connections between science, philosophy, and society, encouraging readers to scrutinize their comprehension of knowledge and truth.